- Banned
- #361
Jim Acosta identifies as a whiny bitch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jim Acosta no longer has access to the White House.
CNN's Jim Acosta has press pass suspended by White House, Sarah Sanders announces
Was he rude enough to deserve this? Share.
Acosta was rude, very rude. Acosta is not the boss.......he needs to learn his placeWell, gee, I missed that one. I've been here all morning, and every time I post too many words, 3 pages appear, and I didn't get a chance to answer all of them, much less read the daily news after 6 am earlier. Never thought I'd see so many opinions, and to make matters worse, some of the videos almost shows the shove, most of them don't. I think Mr. Acosta may have known how to ensure that most of the cameras wouldn't pick up his little malicious act so they could show that "nothing" happened. What can I say, was it luck or planning that only a couple of cameras would pick up the truth of the matter? Or was this another Christine Blasey Ford-style ploy to throw dirt successfully on somebody she can't abide politically?Yep, now he can play the victim.Acosta has been begging to get his credentials revoked since day one. I bet he considers it a political victory.
The White House has already played the Victim Card on behalf of the intern.
Surely George Soros was blocking the best camera angle.
There wasn't a shove. That's ridiculous.
SERIOUSLY?Was he rude enough to deserve this? Share.
The entire Press conference was a circus, but Acosta was the head CLOWN.
Acosta acted like an entitled, spoiled, arrogant prick, having his question answered but demanding he be allowed ask a follow-up question, refusing to give up the microphone being shared by all the reporters, continuing to disrupt the Press conference, ignoring the President telling him 'That's Enough' at least 4 - 5 times, physically blocking a female intern's attempt to do her job - retrieving the microphone from Acosta....?
Acosta had the gall later to declare HE thought he had acted 'extremely professionally'.
No reporter would have treated Obama so shamelessly and never DID do so!
It was more than enough to ban his ass. He should not be the only one, though -
PBS 'reporter' Alcindor, when given the opportunity to ask a question really didn't ASK the President a question as much as actually calling the President a 'Racist' / 'White Supremacist Supporter'.
She acknowledged the President had called himself a 'Nationalist' and then continued by saying 'SOME SAY' that he is more of a racist / is emboldening white supremacists, despite the fact that he has denounced white supremacists numerous times. (The snowflakes / liberals claimed each time, however, that the President had not denounced them 'ENOUGH' or not in the way they demanded him do so.
The President was right to call her out for her racist and insulting question, which amounted to little more than a disrespectful racist attack on him during the Press Conference.
Other reporters stood up at times and shouted out remarks and questions, causing the President to call them out for their behavior, to sit down, wait for their turn, etc....
Trump is in over his head.
Trump is in over his head.
Doing the right thing often places one over one's head. It takes a very determined man these days to be President of the United States. And he did the right thing for sincere people who honestly want to know what the President feels is appropriate to tell them.
Protocols for the press do not include aggressive speech meant to tear up the Executive Branch. And a reporter who uses the Bully Pulpit for selfish purposes has no business being there. I'm glad the little egomaniac Mr. Acosta will not be intimidating anyone at the White House again.
this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
California Mass Shooter Identified As Ian Long, 29, Former Marine VetDon't you get it yet, we just had 11 more people mostly young students gunned down in a night club. & not one op about it. focus on arm pushing.
If they had any integrity? I get it! funny! speaking of integrity tommy, have you honored your commitment to send the caravan money?If they had any integrity his fellow reporters would boycott these sessions until he is reinstated.
the first article is from FOX on it, don't you believe it?this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
both sides are looking for about anything at this point except reality.
i edit videos for a hobby. a good friend does it for a living. the videos are not edited - at least any i've seen in these articles yet.the first article is from FOX on it, don't you believe it?this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
both sides are looking for about anything at this point except reality.
and Marketwatch.com is not a partisan site.
besides, just watch the 2 different videos, one real, one doctored.... no other way to describe it... honestly...
Sanders may not have created the doctored video herself, but she did use a doctored video.
She used an INFOWARS video that was Doctored.i edit videos for a hobby. a good friend does it for a living. the videos are not edited - at least any i've seen in these articles yet.the first article is from FOX on it, don't you believe it?this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
both sides are looking for about anything at this point except reality.
and Marketwatch.com is not a partisan site.
besides, just watch the 2 different videos, one real, one doctored.... no other way to describe it... honestly...
Sanders may not have created the doctored video herself, but she did use a doctored video.
if you speed up the frame rate and that is all you do, EVERYTHING moves faster, which is not happening in any video i've seen yet. if you speed up his arm you get a ghosting / predator / halo effect on video like this - and again, not there.
people need to quit making shit up to be mad at all around. for all the mocking you do of the right when they say something outlandish you turn around and do the same thing by diving into things like this.
I love google searches as proof.She used an INFOWARS video that was Doctored.i edit videos for a hobby. a good friend does it for a living. the videos are not edited - at least any i've seen in these articles yet.the first article is from FOX on it, don't you believe it?this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
both sides are looking for about anything at this point except reality.
and Marketwatch.com is not a partisan site.
besides, just watch the 2 different videos, one real, one doctored.... no other way to describe it... honestly...
Sanders may not have created the doctored video herself, but she did use a doctored video.
if you speed up the frame rate and that is all you do, EVERYTHING moves faster, which is not happening in any video i've seen yet. if you speed up his arm you get a ghosting / predator / halo effect on video like this - and again, not there.
people need to quit making shit up to be mad at all around. for all the mocking you do of the right when they say something outlandish you turn around and do the same thing by diving into things like this.
your choice, pick your own site as a source!
was video of acosta doctored - Google Search
I don't know if the Fox supposition is correct or the one on marketwatch which claims frames were added...
Cory Lewendowski grabbing and bruising reporter Michelle Fields' arm.... Trump's flock took the opposite position back then...
Why?
Is it because they will lose in the game of ''Simon Says'', only now it is called ''Donald Says'', if they do not mock him perfectly, they will lose the game?
Honestly, is this really what you all want to be known as, through your own actions of monkey see, monkey do or Donald Says??
REALLY?
Come on you guys! You are better than this!!! No need to make up some assault claim.... Acosta was rude, that's it.... Maybe a short week's timeout...
The president believes it is ok to be rude.... being rude is what you love about him....
NOT being PC is what you LOVE about Trump, isn't it???
By all means, start a thread yourself.Don't you get it yet, we just had 11 more people mostly young students gunned down in a night club. & not one op about it. focus on arm pushing.
i'm picking no site at all. i've seen the videos and i know for a fact you can't simply speed up the frame rate to get what you think you're getting.She used an INFOWARS video that was Doctored.i edit videos for a hobby. a good friend does it for a living. the videos are not edited - at least any i've seen in these articles yet.the first article is from FOX on it, don't you believe it?this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
both sides are looking for about anything at this point except reality.
and Marketwatch.com is not a partisan site.
besides, just watch the 2 different videos, one real, one doctored.... no other way to describe it... honestly...
Sanders may not have created the doctored video herself, but she did use a doctored video.
if you speed up the frame rate and that is all you do, EVERYTHING moves faster, which is not happening in any video i've seen yet. if you speed up his arm you get a ghosting / predator / halo effect on video like this - and again, not there.
people need to quit making shit up to be mad at all around. for all the mocking you do of the right when they say something outlandish you turn around and do the same thing by diving into things like this.
your choice, pick your own site as a source!
was video of acosta doctored - Google Search
I don't know if the Fox supposition is correct or the one on marketwatch which claims frames were added...
adding frames now? i guess when the first technical explanation goes splat on the wall you change it to keep the conspiracy alive.She used an INFOWARS video that was Doctored.i edit videos for a hobby. a good friend does it for a living. the videos are not edited - at least any i've seen in these articles yet.the first article is from FOX on it, don't you believe it?this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
both sides are looking for about anything at this point except reality.
and Marketwatch.com is not a partisan site.
besides, just watch the 2 different videos, one real, one doctored.... no other way to describe it... honestly...
Sanders may not have created the doctored video herself, but she did use a doctored video.
if you speed up the frame rate and that is all you do, EVERYTHING moves faster, which is not happening in any video i've seen yet. if you speed up his arm you get a ghosting / predator / halo effect on video like this - and again, not there.
people need to quit making shit up to be mad at all around. for all the mocking you do of the right when they say something outlandish you turn around and do the same thing by diving into things like this.
your choice, pick your own site as a source!
was video of acosta doctored - Google Search
I don't know if the Fox supposition is correct or the one on marketwatch which claims frames were added...
I refer to President Twitter in a less than deferential fashion because overall I don't approve of his behavior and given the fact that he works for me and not the other way around, I as a citizen am well within my rights to do so (well at least until he and his cohorts get around to working to intimidate private citizens for expressing views he doesn't like I suppose), he'll get more respect and less ridicule when he begins behaving in a fashion that merits it. On the other hand, unlike him I don't go about attempting to use State Power to intimidate anyone into silence.Not really. Jim Acosta's unconscionable speech, and subsequent pushing back White House personnel supporting the President's admonishment of Mr. Acosta amounted to the trouble this fella got himself into all by himself with nobody else's assistance.Jim Acosta no longer has access to the White House.
CNN's Jim Acosta has press pass suspended by White House, Sarah Sanders announces
Was he rude enough to deserve this? Share.
Asking questions the President doesn't want to answer, how rude.
We've had almost two years of Donny in the White House, these reporters should know by now that questions must be confined to the weather and President Twitters golf game.
You'll notice that if you examine your own response objectively it's filled with subjective conclusions. The fact of the matter is that "rude" is a matter of opinion and regarding the subject of freedom of the press it sets an unfortunate precedent when a reporter is not only tossed (perhaps permanently) from the White House but also horribly slandered in public by the POTUS afterwards for attempting to do his job, even if the President doesn't like said reporters "style". Acosta could have acted more professionally but he didn't do anything that was extreme and the press needs to be given the leeway in such situations, else the Freedom of the Press is supposed to enjoy is confounded and eroded.
This is just a continuation of Donny's attempt to intimidate those segments of the press that report things he doesn't like and his comments afterwards (regarding the reporter and the company he works for) resemble something one might have expected to find during the mid 1920's in Italy.
You'll notice that if you examine your own response objectively it's filled with subjective conclusions. The fact of the matter is that "rude" is a matter of opinion and regarding the subject of freedom of the press it sets an unfortunate precedent when a reporter is not only tossed (perhaps permanently) from the White House but also horribly slandered in public by the POTUS afterwards for attempting to do his job, even if the President doesn't like said reporters "style". Acosta could have acted more professionally but he didn't do anything that was extreme and the press needs to be given the leeway in such situations, else the Freedom of the Press is supposed to enjoy is confounded and eroded.Did you notice me shoving somebody in the tit region, dear? You're the one pointing the finger at me for subjectivity when you refer to the President of the United States as "Donny".
This is just a continuation of Donny's attempt to intimidate those segments of the press that report things he doesn't like and his comments afterwards (regarding the reporter and the company he works for) resemble something one might have expected to find during the mid 1920's in Italy.
Don't you love politics. Things get bent quickly if they don't suit the offender! The only change made on the film was to zoom in in the part where touching is concerned.It showed what really happened, and Acosta doesn't want anybody else to know what he did. The loyal opposition is pleased to support hiding the truth of what happened.i'm picking no site at all. i've seen the videos and i know for a fact you can't simply speed up the frame rate to get what you think you're getting.She used an INFOWARS video that was Doctored.i edit videos for a hobby. a good friend does it for a living. the videos are not edited - at least any i've seen in these articles yet.the first article is from FOX on it, don't you believe it?this sounds just as bad as saying acosta backhanded her.ahhhh, sarah and whitehouse DOCTORED THE VIDEO or used a doctored video... explains why you all believed the whiehouse crap
Sarah Sanders accused of circulating 'doctored' video of Jim Acosta’s interaction with White House intern
Video of Acosta incident posted by White House press secretary contains extra frames
A video shared by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.
both sides are looking for about anything at this point except reality.
and Marketwatch.com is not a partisan site.
besides, just watch the 2 different videos, one real, one doctored.... no other way to describe it... honestly...
Sanders may not have created the doctored video herself, but she did use a doctored video.
if you speed up the frame rate and that is all you do, EVERYTHING moves faster, which is not happening in any video i've seen yet. if you speed up his arm you get a ghosting / predator / halo effect on video like this - and again, not there.
people need to quit making shit up to be mad at all around. for all the mocking you do of the right when they say something outlandish you turn around and do the same thing by diving into things like this.
your choice, pick your own site as a source!
was video of acosta doctored - Google Search
I don't know if the Fox supposition is correct or the one on marketwatch which claims frames were added...
you laugh at others for falling for a conspiracy theory then you run out and do it yourself. the video editing has already been debunked several times. but if you are hellbent on believing it, you will. much like those who think acosta "backhanded" her, you're going to die believing the video was edited.
you tell me - if you speed up the frame rate, how come the people in the background are not going "keystone cop" on us also?