Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct.The National Socialist Party was as socialist as the People's Republic of China is a republic.
In Germany National Socialism was a fascist movement – rightist, reactionary, fearful of change, diversity, and dissent.
National Socialists sought to return Germany to an idealized past of Teutonic imperial glory.
When the NSDAP gained control of the German government in 1933, it established an authoritarian regime dedicated to the destruction of diversity and dissent, fighting to resist change.
Indeed, after Hitler consolidated his power by murdering Ernst Roehm and destroying the SA, among the first victims of the Nazi regime were liberals, democrats, and others who opposed fascism and Hitler’s rise to power.
Today we see that same rightist reactionaryism fearful of, and hostile toward, change, diversity, and dissent.
Wrong....nazism is a type of socialism, therefore left wing, not Right wing...as far As American conservatism goes... the party of hate, violence and racism is the democrat party, a left wing, socialist party that uses race and hate to gain power....that you can't see that shows you are not very observant of truth and realilty.
Wong, the Nazi's were not socialist. They used the term "Socialist" to attract the working class, but in the end,,,,,:
"Hitler crushed the Nazi Party’s left, or socialist-oriented, wing in 1934, executing Ernst Röhm and other rebellious SA leaders on what would become known as the “Night of the Long Knives.”
Nazi Party | Definition, Meaning, History, & Facts
And again, 2aguy shows his ignorance.
Yes...they were socialists.....lying about it won't change that truth....
Nazism is Socialism -- F A Hayek, et al
By Friedrich August von Hayek Spring 1933
Hoover Institution, F. A. Hayek Papers, Box/Folder 105 : 10.
The persecution of the Marxists, and of democrats in general, tends to obscure the fundamental fact that National “Socialism” is a genuine socialist movement, whose leading ideas are the final fruit of the anti-liberal tendencies which have been steadily gaining ground in Germany since the later part of the Bismarckian era, and which led the majority of the German intelligentsia first to “socialism of the chair” and later to Marxism in its social-democratic or communist form.
One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too -as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment -have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because -and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany – many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience. But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a move movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt.
A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capitali
To you read what you post?
"A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capital"
And then there's this:
The Coining of “Privatization” and Germany’s National Socialist Party
An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie
Hitler, Nazis, Socialism, and Rightwing Propaganda
NazismSocialism
Correct.The National Socialist Party was as socialist as the People's Republic of China is a republic.Leftists are not liberals in the classical sense of the word.
The National SOCIALIST Party killed millions of jews.
And take a look at the anti-semitism on the left in the U.S. these days, bub.
In Germany National Socialism was a fascist movement – rightist, reactionary, fearful of change, diversity, and dissent.
National Socialists sought to return Germany to an idealized past of Teutonic imperial glory.
When the NSDAP gained control of the German government in 1933, it established an authoritarian regime dedicated to the destruction of diversity and dissent, fighting to resist change.
Indeed, after Hitler consolidated his power by murdering Ernst Roehm and destroying the SA, among the first victims of the Nazi regime were liberals, democrats, and others who opposed fascism and Hitler’s rise to power.
Today we see that same rightist reactionaryism fearful of, and hostile toward, change, diversity, and dissent.
Wrong....nazism is a type of socialism, therefore left wing, not Right wing...as far As American conservatism goes... the party of hate, violence and racism is the democrat party, a left wing, socialist party that uses race and hate to gain power....that you can't see that shows you are not very observant of truth and realilty.
Wong, the Nazi's were not socialist. They used the term "Socialist" to attract the working class, but in the end,,,,,:
"Hitler crushed the Nazi Party’s left, or socialist-oriented, wing in 1934, executing Ernst Röhm and other rebellious SA leaders on what would become known as the “Night of the Long Knives.”
Nazi Party | Definition, Meaning, History, & Facts
And again, 2aguy shows his ignorance.
That's exactly the spin the Progs and Leftists put on Nazism in order to distance themselves in the eyes of gullible people. In realityland, Nazism is a direct relation to the Prog-Socialism the Left promotes today.
---------------------------------------------- i remember on a trip as a 9 or 10 year old hearing on the car radio that there were some killings , murders , shootouts in Detroit or Chicago . This was in the mid 60s and i just asked DAD Why don't we just get rid of Guns . He explained the REAL Meaning of the Second Amendment and also explained that if all the Guns were removed that that action would only hurt the good normal people as it would limit their FREEDOM . He said that there is always a Cost to having FREEDOM and that cost is sometimes random shootings .I would posit that the framers understood that the world always has been, and always will be marked with violence in various forms. As such, they determined that it was ones inherent right to defend themselves against all comers...Wrong.----------------------------------------------- so what , they don't have the Freedom to defend themselves either and most foreign states are pretty fecked up Brian .It sure does a good job in countries where there are strong gun laws. They have homicide rates a fraction of ours, and don't have constant mass shootings.Yes we have way too many guns and weak gun laws.
Gun laws will never keep guns out of the hands of criminals...
Theirs is a society not predisposed to violence where the issue of gun ownership is moot.
In fact, that Americans have the right to possess firearms pursuant to the right of lawful self-defense is an acknowledgement by the Framers that America is indeed an inherently violent society.
Just as much as a full blown exaggeration as saying govetnment nade this shooring worse.
Not so much.
Soviets were producing far more tanks & aircraft.
They had much more forces.
The Nazi issue was they depended on Soviet resources for their war effort.
Therefor Operation Barbarossa was a terrible idiocy & terrible tragedy.
Wrong...the Soviets lost most of their stockpiles to the initial German invasion..having based much of their equipment close to their border for their invasion of Germany.... the Soviets also had initial mass defections to the Germans...before the people realized the socialist Germans were as murderous as the Soviet Socialists.....
If not for the U.S. the Germans would have conquered Russia...
Go make a Operation Barbarossa thread & I'll respond.
I am personally tired of getting banned for others off topic BS.
The bottomline is government stopped this massacre & government stopped the Holocaust.
What government? By that stage, the Germans had run out of Jews to kill, and had turned on their own.
The government police stopped this massacre.
The Soviet government actions liberated Auschwitz.
Government is necessary.
No one says government isn't necessary...
As to say the Soviets liberated Auschwitz as they murdered 25 million innocent people is sorta funny.....considering the slaughter they also engaged in as they moved into Germany and Poland...it was the Soviets who also murdered Polish citizens....
Wrong...the Soviets lost most of their stockpiles to the initial German invasion..having based much of their equipment close to their border for their invasion of Germany.... the Soviets also had initial mass defections to the Germans...before the people realized the socialist Germans were as murderous as the Soviet Socialists.....
If not for the U.S. the Germans would have conquered Russia...
Go make a Operation Barbarossa thread & I'll respond.
I am personally tired of getting banned for others off topic BS.
The bottomline is government stopped this massacre & government stopped the Holocaust.
What government? By that stage, the Germans had run out of Jews to kill, and had turned on their own.
The government police stopped this massacre.
The Soviet government actions liberated Auschwitz.
Government is necessary.
No one says government isn't necessary...
As to say the Soviets liberated Auschwitz as they murdered 25 million innocent people is sorta funny.....considering the slaughter they also engaged in as they moved into Germany and Poland...it was the Soviets who also murdered Polish citizens....
Total BS blaming Soviets for soldiers & civilians Nazis killed.
Now why do these massacres like the OP, happen?????
I don't think it's guns or lack of guns.
More along the lines of genetic trash who are mentally ill & or violent killing in these shootings.
Keep in mind about 8 - 9% of the USA is Ulster Irish with Ulster Irish having a very long & deep history of massacres.
Wrong...the Soviets lost most of their stockpiles to the initial German invasion..having based much of their equipment close to their border for their invasion of Germany.... the Soviets also had initial mass defections to the Germans...before the people realized the socialist Germans were as murderous as the Soviet Socialists.....
If not for the U.S. the Germans would have conquered Russia...
Go make a Operation Barbarossa thread & I'll respond.
I am personally tired of getting banned for others off topic BS.
The bottomline is government stopped this massacre & government stopped the Holocaust.
What government? By that stage, the Germans had run out of Jews to kill, and had turned on their own.
The government police stopped this massacre.
The Soviet government actions liberated Auschwitz.
Government is necessary.
No one says government isn't necessary...
As to say the Soviets liberated Auschwitz as they murdered 25 million innocent people is sorta funny.....considering the slaughter they also engaged in as they moved into Germany and Poland...it was the Soviets who also murdered Polish citizens....
Total BS blaming Soviets for soldiers & civilians Nazis killed.
Now why do these massacres like the OP, happen?????
I don't think it's guns or lack of guns.
More along the lines of genetic trash who are mentally ill & or violent killing in these shootings.
Keep in mind about 8 - 9% of the USA is Ulster Irish with Ulster Irish having a very long & deep history of massacres.
This was a baby naming ceremony ....... The guy in this pic is wait for it............... wait for it.................. RUSSIAN/JEW he feared his dad was in the synagog but he wasn't.
(PIC won't load oh well )
View attachment 225184
Synagogue Shooter Disliked Trump, Posted “I Did Not Vote For Him”
The LEFTIST FKS are going to use this as another GUN BS TAKE down watch,..
And it appears that this guy hated not just Jews...but Trump.....
So....will this story now disappear since the shooter hated President Trump? I know the anti gunners can't wait because the guy used an AR-15.....but if they guy hates Trump then that might mean they have to bury the story.....
Go make a Operation Barbarossa thread & I'll respond.
I am personally tired of getting banned for others off topic BS.
The bottomline is government stopped this massacre & government stopped the Holocaust.
What government? By that stage, the Germans had run out of Jews to kill, and had turned on their own.
The government police stopped this massacre.
The Soviet government actions liberated Auschwitz.
Government is necessary.
No one says government isn't necessary...
As to say the Soviets liberated Auschwitz as they murdered 25 million innocent people is sorta funny.....considering the slaughter they also engaged in as they moved into Germany and Poland...it was the Soviets who also murdered Polish citizens....
Total BS blaming Soviets for soldiers & civilians Nazis killed.
Now why do these massacres like the OP, happen?????
I don't think it's guns or lack of guns.
More along the lines of genetic trash who are mentally ill & or violent killing in these shootings.
Keep in mind about 8 - 9% of the USA is Ulster Irish with Ulster Irish having a very long & deep history of massacres.
Yes, only the White Europeans clustered around Poland have the perfect human genes.
.......you realize that crap is insane, right?
And makes you sound batcrap insane.
And it appears that this guy hated not just Jews...but Trump.....
So....will this story now disappear since the shooter hated President Trump? I know the anti gunners can't wait because the guy used an AR-15.....but if they guy hates Trump then that might mean they have to bury the story.....
Some valiant NPC warrior are still trying on Twitter, believe it! The perp said "invaders" and so did Trump therefore....Trump Did It!!
How awful!. I used to live blocks from this Temple. Squirrel Hill is a peaceful and lovely neighborhood known for its large Jewish population, tree-lined streets, and hellish parking.
What??? No squirrels?
You're lucky, squirrels eat nuts and you'd be a risk.
