Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,437
- 9,181
- 1,340
No.yeah i guess, can you explain
I guessed that you would understand.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.yeah i guess, can you explain
No.
I guessed that you would understand.
He also knows who will talk it down. Loudly.
I'm for getting money out of politics yes.So you’re for this then?
He didn't have to, Mueller did.He's always been a drama queen.
Did he ever reveal his proof that Russian collusion was real?
Nor should they be won based on how much corporate interest, leading to dark money contributions, a candidate can attract.Elections shouldn’t be won on who can saturate the most markets with negative advertising.
My donation to a political campaign is absolutely an expression.No they're not.
They're monetary donations.
The same as the Democrats. The Democrats are counting on the Republicans to vote this down. That's why they proposed the amendment, now, instead of when they were in the majority.Uh huh.
What will be the politics of the Republicans?
Elections shouldn’t be won on who can saturate the most markets with negative advertising.
Citizens United was designed specifically to allow Political donations to Be exempt from any requirements that they be disclosed.
For example if you have a politician taking multimillion dollar donations from a company which they In charge of overseeing On a congressional committee, It might The American people left likely to vote for that person If they knew that he was taking those donations. In many cases Large corporate donations are basically Legalized bribery. Citizens United allow those Donations to be Clip done in secret and shielded from public scrutiny.
I am all four companies and people being allowed to make political donations but all donations should be disclosed so that the American people know whose pocket their leaders are in.
That's the thing about free speech you're free to say whatever you want, And if you want to consider spending money for an issue to be speech that's fine. But if I see someone wearing a mask while they're talking I'm going to assume that they're trying to hide their identity to protect themselves from being scrutinized for what they're saying because they know it's wrong. In the lack of disclosure requirements under citizens United is exactly the same thing.
NeverWhen do you suppose someone will propose enacting regulations to stop the political parties from doing that?
He didn't have to, Mueller did.
![]()
Putting an end to an ubiquitous meme from Trump loyalists
It has been asserted hundreds of times by occupants of Trumpworld........the collusion hoax. It comes up in all manner of contexts. Most recently as a way to dismiss the 1/6 committee's work. Let's see what the facts say. Manafort conspired with Kilimnik to give the Kremlin internal polling...www.usmessageboard.com
Next you'll want to do away anonymous ballots.Citizens United was designed specifically to allow Political donations to Be exempt from any requirements that they be disclosed.
For example if you have a politician taking multimillion dollar donations from a company which they In charge of overseeing On a congressional committee, It might The American people left likely to vote for that person If they knew that he was taking those donations. In many cases Large corporate donations are basically Legalized bribery. Citizens United allow those Donations to be Clip done in secret and shielded from public scrutiny.
I am all four companies and people being allowed to make political donations but all donations should be disclosed so that the American people know whose pocket their leaders are in.
That's the thing about free speech you're free to say whatever you want, And if you want to consider spending money for an issue to be speech that's fine. But if I see someone wearing a mask while they're talking I'm going to assume that they're trying to hide their identity to protect themselves from being scrutinized for what they're saying because they know it's wrong. In the lack of disclosure requirements under citizens United is exactly the same thing.
Later in the decade? He is elected by his district and I doubt this issue will motivate his district, as showing he will initiate bills with absolutely no hope of passage, just to draw attention to himself? Attention whores, pretty big and that district? I doubt it.Ok?
Perhaps he already knows how it will go and is using the result for a later purpose?
Of course they do. Do you remember a major push to overturn the ruling when Nancy ran the place? Me neither.Because the Democratic party doesn't get donations from corporations.
This would truly return power to the American people
Yes. I said that already.well you guessed wrong i have no idea what you are even trying to ask
No shit. The Republicans will happily oblige as well.The same as the Democrats. The Democrats are counting on the Republicans to vote this down. That's why they proposed the amendment, now, instead of when they were in the majority.
When do you suppose someone will propose enacting regulations to stop the political parties from doing that?
It’s a good idea.Later in the decade? He is elected by his district and I doubt this issue will motivate his district, as showing he will initiate bills with absolutely no hope of passage, just to draw attention to himself? Attention whores, pretty big and that district? I doubt it.