Bush92
GHBush1992
- May 23, 2014
- 34,808
- 10,714
- 1,400
Is that what President Xi told you to say?Anonymous sources. Fake news.It's a spin job, nothing more or less. Fact 1: Without forensics to see what kind of code was used ( and it is very provable of a hack because firewalls show data of penetration attempts) coupled with the fact that no I.T complained of hacking or warned of a hack until the Wikileaks drop. You are a joke clinging to lies because the truth is too painful and embarrassing.Yet you can’t provide any actual critique of it. What did the link do wrong?Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
![]()
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.Your provided link is a fucking joke. It is easily the worst spin job ever attempted. Keep believing tbat the ROOOSKIES denied the leftard clown posse of the pedo Hildebeast, ya creepy pussbag.Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
![]()
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.
More if you want:
Why that "file-copy" forensics of DNC hack is wrong
People keep asking me about this story about how forensics "experts" have found proof the DNC hack was an inside job, because files were co...blog.erratasec.com
Hey Dale, as always, you're lying and I can prove it:
Here's an article from June 14th, 2016 saying the Russians hacked the DNC.
And here's another article dated July 25th, 2016 about the first dump of DNC Emails by WikiLeaks:
![]()
What was in the DNC email leak?
Debbie Wasserman Schultz's stewardship of the Democratic National Committee has been under fire through most of the presidential primary process.www.cnn.com
So to say that "no one complained about the hacking until after the first email dump is UTTERLY FALSE.
You are just so fucking stupid. Dale's claim was that nobody even mentioned the Russian hacking until the first dump of WikiLeaks emails. The WAPO article talks about the DNC hacking in mid-June, and the WikiLeaks first dump was in late July.
When you have two public articles which establish the time line of the charges of Russian hacking and the first dump of emails, IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER WHERE THEY COME FROM OR WHETHER THEY'RE ACCURATE OR NOT, DALE SMITH LIED ABOUT THE TIME LINE FINGER BOI.
It's hard to believe you've managed survived this long.