After Suing CNN, Sandmann’s legal team now targeting Bill Maher, Kathy Griffin, HBO, NBC and AP

They're always horrible. But that's not a 'story'. Nor is it related to the Smirk

SMILE

Today's vocabulary lesson:

smile
/smīl/
verb
  1. 1.
    form one's features into a pleased, kind, or amused expression, typically with the corners of the mouth turned up and the front teeth exposed.
    "she was smiling"
    synonyms: grin, beam, grin like a Cheshire cat, grin from ear to ear, twinkle;
    informalbe all smiles
    "Joseph looked up at her and smiled"



noun
  1. 1.
    a pleased, kind, or amused facial expression, typically with the corners of the mouth turned up and the front teeth exposed.
    "he flashed his most winning smile"
    synonyms: grin, beam; More
===========================================================​
smirk
/smərk/
verb
  1. 1.
    smile in an irritatingly smug, conceited, or silly way.
    "he smirked in triumph"
    synonyms: smile smugly, simper, snigger; More
noun
  1. 1.
    a smug, conceited, or silly smile.
    "Gloria pursed her mouth in a self-satisfied smirk"
 
What really got me about all this is how nobody gave a shit about the ACTUAL racists in the video. Those black guys were horrible!

They're always horrible. But that's not a 'story'. Nor is it related to the Smirk.
They were the only racists and nobody gave a shit.
Drop the smirk shtick. You are ignorant on this.

Who brought up "racists"?

What shits were supposed to be given? The Hebrew Israelites or whatever they call themselves have a known history. There's no story in a wackball group doing what it always does.
 
What really got me about all this is how nobody gave a shit about the ACTUAL racists in the video. Those black guys were horrible!

They're always horrible. But that's not a 'story'. Nor is it related to the Smirk.
They were the only racists and nobody gave a shit.
Drop the smirk shtick. You are ignorant on this.

Who brought up "racists"?

What shits were supposed to be given? The Hebrew Israelites or whatever they call themselves have a known history. There's no story in a wackball group doing what it always does.
The white kid was being publically crucified for being racist even after the full video came out.
Some of the rhetoric didnt even stop.
Nobody said a word about the actual racists.
 
Snowflakery at its ugliest.

There can be no criticism of an Authoritarian. Free speech be thou a damned thing in Trumpland!
Libel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
Cite examples.
Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.
 
Snowflakery at its ugliest.

There can be no criticism of an Authoritarian. Free speech be thou a damned thing in Trumpland!
Libel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
Cite examples.
Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.

If there was “ample evidence” why has no one ever found it?
 
What really got me about all this is how nobody gave a shit about the ACTUAL racists in the video. Those black guys were horrible!

They're always horrible. But that's not a 'story'. Nor is it related to the Smirk.
They were the only racists and nobody gave a shit.
Drop the smirk shtick. You are ignorant on this.

Who brought up "racists"?

What shits were supposed to be given? The Hebrew Israelites or whatever they call themselves have a known history. There's no story in a wackball group doing what it always does.
The white kid was being publically crucified for being racist even after the full video came out.

By CNN? By any media outlet?

See, this is why I put the challenge out TWO MONTHS AGO for anyone, anywhere to find me any example of media libel. To date, after two months, I still have literally ZERO.

Some of the rhetoric didnt even stop.
Nobody said a word about the actual racists.

The issue here isn't "racism". Never was. The issue is Smirk. You can't read "racism" out of a smirk. And you can't sue "public opinion" for libel.
 
Snowflakery at its ugliest.

There can be no criticism of an Authoritarian. Free speech be thou a damned thing in Trumpland!
Libel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
Cite examples.
Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.
If Hillary is a criminal, why has she NEVER been convicted of anything, even after many con investigations or accusations?
 
Libel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
Cite examples.
Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.

If there was “ample evidence” why has no one ever found it?
Because they’re busy investigating trump.
Are you not aware of Comey’s FBI decision to not investigate Hillary because the election was near and they didn’t want to interfere?
 
Libel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
Cite examples.
Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.
If Hillary is a criminal, why has she NEVER been convicted of anything, even after many con investigations or accusations?
I just explained that.
 
Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
Cite examples.
Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.

If there was “ample evidence” why has no one ever found it?
Because they’re busy investigating trump.
Are you not aware of Comey’s FBI decision to not investigate Hillary because the election was near and they didn’t want to interfere?

17 investigations have been completed with no evidence of criminal activity found. 6 years of investigation by a Soecial Prosecutor found nothing. Lots of immunity offered but no charges resulted. No witnesses. No evidence. And no crimes were committed.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: PK1
Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
Cite examples.
Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.
If Hillary is a criminal, why has she NEVER been convicted of anything, even after many con investigations or accusations?
I just explained that.
No you did not.
AFTER Trump’s election, he & many cons (in Congress too?) wanted her in jail ...
Well ???
 
Snowflakery at its ugliest.

There can be no criticism of an Authoritarian. Free speech be thou a damned thing in Trumpland!
Libel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Satire and commentary do not rise to the threshold of slander and libel
They sure do in this case. Let’s see where the lawsuit goes.

This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.

What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.
 
Snowflakery at its ugliest.

There can be no criticism of an Authoritarian. Free speech be thou a damned thing in Trumpland!
Libel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Satire and commentary do not rise to the threshold of slander and libel
They sure do in this case. Let’s see where the lawsuit goes.

This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.

What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.

Interestingly the PR firm behind all this traces straight back to Mitch McConnell.
 
This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.

What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.
I'm sure it pleases you to think this.

30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.

They will be settled out of court. The media companies won't risk this to a jury trial and establish case law precedent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top