Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sure it pleases you to think this.This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.
What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.
30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.
I'm sure it pleases you to think this.This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.
What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.
30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.
They will be settled out of court. The media companies won't risk this to a jury trial and establish case law precedent.
Who knew that the FBI can’t do more than one thing at a time!Because they’re busy investigating trump.There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murdererCite examples.Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky wins
If there was “ample evidence” why has no one ever found it?
Are you not aware of Comey’s FBI decision to not investigate Hillary because the election was near and they didn’t want to interfere?
I'm sure it pleases you to think this.This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.
What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.
30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.
They will be settled out of court. The media companies won't risk this to a jury trial and establish case law precedent.
No one investigated her email issue.Because they’re busy investigating trump.There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murdererCite examples.
If there was “ample evidence” why has no one ever found it?
Are you not aware of Comey’s FBI decision to not investigate Hillary because the election was near and they didn’t want to interfere?
17 investigations have been completed with no evidence of criminal activity found. 6 years of investigation by a Soecial Prosecutor found nothing. Lots of immunity offered but no charges resulted. No witnesses. No evidence. And no crimes were committed.
Because she hasn’t been investigated for her crimes — yet.If Hillary is a criminal, why has she NEVER been convicted of anything, even after many con investigations or accusations?There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murdererCite examples.Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky winsLibel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.
Yes I did. Go back and read.No you did not.I just explained that.If Hillary is a criminal, why has she NEVER been convicted of anything, even after many con investigations or accusations?There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murdererCite examples.
AFTER Trump’s election, he & many cons (in Congress too?) wanted her in jail ...
Well ???
Comet made a conscious decision to not investigate.Who knew that the FBI can’t do more than one thing at a time!Because they’re busy investigating trump.There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murdererCite examples.
If there was “ample evidence” why has no one ever found it?
Are you not aware of Comey’s FBI decision to not investigate Hillary because the election was near and they didn’t want to interfere?
And Comey’s Halloween day announcement damaged Minton more than anything
There was a lot of baggage with Hill and Bill.Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murdererCite examples.Then Trump is in deep shit if butthurt little Nicky winsLibel and slander aren’t free speech. You have to pay for it.Snowflakery at its ugliest.
There can be no criticism of an Authoritarian. Free speech be thou a damned thing in Trumpland!
I'm sure it pleases you to think this.This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.
What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.
30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.
They will be settled out of court. The media companies won't risk this to a jury trial and establish case law precedent.
No they won’t be settled out of court. News outlets NEVER settle out of court. This is a civil case which you’re right, will never go to trial because the family will lose.
They have to prove that the slander was malicious and done with intent.
Each of these entities has the resources and the will to fight this on 1st Amendment grounds, and they’ll win.
As long as it makes you happy to think so.No they won’t be settled out of court. News outlets NEVER settle out of court. This is a civil case which you’re right, will never go to trial because the family will lose.
They have to prove that the slander was malicious and done with intent.
Each of these entities has the resources and the will to fight this on 1st Amendment grounds, and they’ll win.
Comet made a conscious decision to not investigate.Who knew that the FBI can’t do more than one thing at a time!Because they’re busy investigating trump.There is ample evidence of Hillary being criminal. What’s more, she’s a public figure so the libel and slander laws are different.Everybody he’s ever slandered on twitter, in speeaches, etc. For example, slandering Hillary by spending years calling her a criminal and murderer
If there was “ample evidence” why has no one ever found it?
Are you not aware of Comey’s FBI decision to not investigate Hillary because the election was near and they didn’t want to interfere?
And Comey’s Halloween day announcement damaged Minton more than anything
I'm sure it pleases you to think this.This lawsuit, like the others, will go in the round filer.
What WILL happen is the family will be billed for every one of these cases filed.
30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.
They will be settled out of court. The media companies won't risk this to a jury trial and establish case law precedent.
No they won’t be settled out of court. News outlets NEVER settle out of court. This is a civil case which you’re right, will never go to trial because the family will lose.
They have to prove that the slander was malicious and done with intent.
Each of these entities has the resources and the will to fight this on 1st Amendment grounds, and they’ll win.
All true, but at the same time I would appreciate it if you would say what they did was wrong, and damaging to our country.
Someone manufactured a story...actually worse, they took video that showed one thing, that they don't like, and carefully edited it to make the opposite appear true. And then the gleeful media bought that shit like chicken dinner on a Sunday and served right up without hesitation. And then they spent an entire day hashing it out 100 ways getting everyone to get their jib in. And then....oops. Damn...it's not true. But then what did they do? Did they retract the story and apologize and say we all screwed up?? Nope. They then continued to attack the kid for a "smirk" on his face.
Nevermind the crowd of black people yelling honky and whitey, and calling them "products of incest"...that's not important. Nevermind the star player in their story was a farce who lied about his military service and was the agressor...nope...he had a smirk on his face so he is still guilty.
That is what is wrong.
And that, I hop, you will condemn.
As long as it makes you happy to think so.No they won’t be settled out of court. News outlets NEVER settle out of court. This is a civil case which you’re right, will never go to trial because the family will lose.
They have to prove that the slander was malicious and done with intent.
Each of these entities has the resources and the will to fight this on 1st Amendment grounds, and they’ll win.
The Sandmann family has hired one of the premiere lawyers in the nation in these types of cases, L. Lin Wood.
He already took on all the big media giants when he represented Richard Jewell when he was unfairly targeted by the FBI during the Atlanta Olympics and won over them all.
This man does not waste his time with cases he doesn't think can be won. L. Lin Wood - Wikipedia
Good luck with your hopeful wishes.
I'm sure it pleases you to think this.
30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.
They will be settled out of court. The media companies won't risk this to a jury trial and establish case law precedent.
No they won’t be settled out of court. News outlets NEVER settle out of court. This is a civil case which you’re right, will never go to trial because the family will lose.
They have to prove that the slander was malicious and done with intent.
Each of these entities has the resources and the will to fight this on 1st Amendment grounds, and they’ll win.
All true, but at the same time I would appreciate it if you would say what they did was wrong, and damaging to our country.
Someone manufactured a story...actually worse, they took video that showed one thing, that they don't like, and carefully edited it to make the opposite appear true. And then the gleeful media bought that shit like chicken dinner on a Sunday and served right up without hesitation. And then they spent an entire day hashing it out 100 ways getting everyone to get their jib in. And then....oops. Damn...it's not true. But then what did they do? Did they retract the story and apologize and say we all screwed up?? Nope. They then continued to attack the kid for a "smirk" on his face.
Nevermind the crowd of black people yelling honky and whitey, and calling them "products of incest"...that's not important. Nevermind the star player in their story was a farce who lied about his military service and was the agressor...nope...he had a smirk on his face so he is still guilty.
That is what is wrong.
And that, I hop, you will condemn.
WHERE exactly is this contrived "story"? What exactly is it?
I put that question out two months ago, when it was current "news", and no one has yet come up with anything.
The story, far as I know, is that some kid parked himself in front of a chanting Indian and smirked for several minutes.
That's it. And it's on video. What else is there?
30 years of working for the legal trades. This family is dumb enough to think they can win.
They will be settled out of court. The media companies won't risk this to a jury trial and establish case law precedent.
No they won’t be settled out of court. News outlets NEVER settle out of court. This is a civil case which you’re right, will never go to trial because the family will lose.
They have to prove that the slander was malicious and done with intent.
Each of these entities has the resources and the will to fight this on 1st Amendment grounds, and they’ll win.
All true, but at the same time I would appreciate it if you would say what they did was wrong, and damaging to our country.
Someone manufactured a story...actually worse, they took video that showed one thing, that they don't like, and carefully edited it to make the opposite appear true. And then the gleeful media bought that shit like chicken dinner on a Sunday and served right up without hesitation. And then they spent an entire day hashing it out 100 ways getting everyone to get their jib in. And then....oops. Damn...it's not true. But then what did they do? Did they retract the story and apologize and say we all screwed up?? Nope. They then continued to attack the kid for a "smirk" on his face.
Nevermind the crowd of black people yelling honky and whitey, and calling them "products of incest"...that's not important. Nevermind the star player in their story was a farce who lied about his military service and was the agressor...nope...he had a smirk on his face so he is still guilty.
That is what is wrong.
And that, I hop, you will condemn.
WHERE exactly is this contrived "story"? What exactly is it?
I put that question out two months ago, when it was current "news", and no one has yet come up with anything.
The story, far as I know, is that some kid parked himself in front of a chanting Indian and smirked for several minutes.
That's it. And it's on video. What else is there?
Really Pogo?
So as these kids were trying to get to their bus, there was a group of black men yelling all manner of racist comments at them, and then when they were waiting in comes this Indian moron who thought it would be a good idea to confront a group of teenagers, beat drums in their face and accuse them of all kinds of stuff.
And the REAL story is that one of those kids refused to go hide somewhere.
Really? That's the story?
Right there. The common take in TardomHow exactly has Smirk-Boi been defamed in the public mind
Right there. The common take in TardomHow exactly has Smirk-Boi been defamed in the public mind
