Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Clinton won before any votes were cast? Nonsense.How many more votes has Clinton gotten than Sanders has gotten?
It cracks me up when Democrats talk about Republicans when your nomination was over long ago because of super delegates. No Democrats votes mattered unless someone won a complete landslide
Doesn't matter, which is my point. The Democrat process makes the Republican process look completely free and open. Hillary won before votes were cast as the super delegates went like 95% to her
And yet still no evidence that anything was rigged. Cruz has an amazing organization and his hard work paid off. Trump showed up at the lady second, did crappy work, and thus won nothing.
But somehow that's the party's fault.
No wonder this country is going to hell. You all want to blame others for why you didn't get what you want when you didn't put any effort into getting it.
Gee how did this happen? Cruz delegate. 378 x2.
379 removed. Trump delegate.
Home - The Gateway Pundit
Campaigns desperately need money for those efforts, and if for-profit corporations are allowed to donate,then they own those politicians. The advantages are too big to expect people to just refrain voluntarily.That stuff buys votes? You want to ban money for advertising and get out the vote efforts?
I don't think the House will flip either, but I'd give it a 30%-40% chance if Trump is the nominee.
The reason is simple math. The notion that there are few competitive districts is premised upon a "normal" election, i.e. if the vote is fairly close, like 53/47. But the math changes if it's a blowout, like 59/41.
That's because of the way the districts have been gerrymandered. Most Republican districts have smaller majorities than most Democrat districts. That's why here in Florida, Obama can win the state but the Republicans can win most of the districts. If there is a Democrat tidal wave, many of those "safe" Republican districts aren't going to be safe anymore because there is less of a buffer in the GOP districts than in Democrat districts.
If Trump wins, the Republicans will control everything.
That the number for delegate 379 is missing.And yet still no evidence that anything was rigged. Cruz has an amazing organization and his hard work paid off. Trump showed up at the lady second, did crappy work, and thus won nothing.
But somehow that's the party's fault.
No wonder this country is going to hell. You all want to blame others for why you didn't get what you want when you didn't put any effort into getting it.
Gee how did this happen? Cruz delegate. 378 x2.
379 removed. Trump delegate.
Home - The Gateway Pundit
And what exactly do you think you are showing here?
That the number for delegate 379 is missing.And yet still no evidence that anything was rigged. Cruz has an amazing organization and his hard work paid off. Trump showed up at the lady second, did crappy work, and thus won nothing.
But somehow that's the party's fault.
No wonder this country is going to hell. You all want to blame others for why you didn't get what you want when you didn't put any effort into getting it.
Gee how did this happen? Cruz delegate. 378 x2.
379 removed. Trump delegate.
Home - The Gateway Pundit
And what exactly do you think you are showing here?
That the name of the delegates are not shown alongside the number as is mandated by Colorado election laws.
What do you think he is trying to show, Einstein?
Campaigns desperately need money for those efforts, and if for-profit corporations are allowed to donate,then they own those politicians. The advantages are too big to expect people to just refrain voluntarily.That stuff buys votes? You want to ban money for advertising and get out the vote efforts?
So yes, we need to ban all contributions from for-profit corporations for OBVIOUS reasons.
Your crayon melted a long time ago. You are saying about Clinton that "super delegates went like 95% to her." Like ya know, I didn't know super delegates voted yet.Clinton won before any votes were cast? Nonsense.How many more votes has Clinton gotten than Sanders has gotten?
It cracks me up when Democrats talk about Republicans when your nomination was over long ago because of super delegates. No Democrats votes mattered unless someone won a complete landslide
Doesn't matter, which is my point. The Democrat process makes the Republican process look completely free and open. Hillary won before votes were cast as the super delegates went like 95% to her
If you read the discussion you quoted, you'd know that's not what I said. I put it in blue for you. Do you want me to write it in crayon?
Your crayon melted a long time ago. You are saying about Clinton that "super delegates went like 95% to her." Like ya know, I didn't know super delegates voted yet.Clinton won before any votes were cast? Nonsense.How many more votes has Clinton gotten than Sanders has gotten?It cracks me up when Democrats talk about Republicans when your nomination was over long ago because of super delegates. No Democrats votes mattered unless someone won a complete landslide
Doesn't matter, which is my point. The Democrat process makes the Republican process look completely free and open. Hillary won before votes were cast as the super delegates went like 95% to her
If you read the discussion you quoted, you'd know that's not what I said. I put it in blue for you. Do you want me to write it in crayon?
Do you read polls and then claim people voted for somebody because polls said people favored somebody?
Do you know the GOP has a process where at state conventions Cruz has won delegates that Trump thought he had won? How is that more democratic than Super delegates? Your poor attempt to make the Republican process look more democratic than the Democrat process, falls flat with people who actually know something. People who believe as you do need to stop writing on their desks with crayons, and need to focus more on the instructions being offered during classes. (blue pencil as opposed to blue crayons)
Trump took down the opponents or the opponents self-imploded?Oh, it will be a blowout....in favor of Trump if he is the nominee, unless his opponent is Sanders.
It is amazing how m any people still dont understand how Trump has been so effective at taking down his opponents.
Hillary is a walking 'target rich environment' all by herself.
There you go again, claiming the process for selecting a party nominee is more democratic in the Republican primaries and caucuses, than in the Democrat primaries and caucuses. That is simply not true. Perception is not realitySwish, missed it again. You keep dancing, Fred Astaire. The point is that Super delegates dominate the Democrat nomination process. The discussion is about voting versus the party. Republicans as poor as the process is are way more dominated by voting than you are. Your dancing isn't changing that
Well, Trump is doing better than the other two so the votes went ...where?Trump picked up almost no extra support after each of 14 or so opponents dropped out. He still averaged around 35% before NY. In New York, his home state, he finally won big. wow.
Sanders will have his Socialist Workers Party past thrown at him in a general election. Sanders has not been attacked yet. Hillary has been attacked since the 1980s and even in NY where she was accused of carpetbagging, she won a US Senate seat twice.
540 superdelegates, 502 to her, democracy in action!There you go again, claiming the process for selecting a party nominee is more democratic in the Republican primaries and caucuses, than in the Democrat primaries and caucuses. That is simply not true. Perception is not realitySwish, missed it again. You keep dancing, Fred Astaire. The point is that Super delegates dominate the Democrat nomination process. The discussion is about voting versus the party. Republicans as poor as the process is are way more dominated by voting than you are. Your dancing isn't changing that
540 superdelegates, 502 to her, democracy in action!There you go again, claiming the process for selecting a party nominee is more democratic in the Republican primaries and caucuses, than in the Democrat primaries and caucuses. That is simply not true. Perception is not realitySwish, missed it again. You keep dancing, Fred Astaire. The point is that Super delegates dominate the Democrat nomination process. The discussion is about voting versus the party. Republicans as poor as the process is are way more dominated by voting than you are. Your dancing isn't changing that
540 superdelegates, 502 to her, democracy in action!There you go again, claiming the process for selecting a party nominee is more democratic in the Republican primaries and caucuses, than in the Democrat primaries and caucuses. That is simply not true. Perception is not realitySwish, missed it again. You keep dancing, Fred Astaire. The point is that Super delegates dominate the Democrat nomination process. The discussion is about voting versus the party. Republicans as poor as the process is are way more dominated by voting than you are. Your dancing isn't changing that
right, the whole thing is designed to allow the elites to control the selection regardless of the votes of the people.
The good thing is that it is being disclosed during this election cycle. Thank you Donald Trump.
Would it have mattered?IT would come off better if Cryin Donald would criticize all the States before the primaries/caucuses that do that rather than just the ones he lost in afterward
540 superdelegates, 502 to her, democracy in action!There you go again, claiming the process for selecting a party nominee is more democratic in the Republican primaries and caucuses, than in the Democrat primaries and caucuses. That is simply not true. Perception is not realitySwish, missed it again. You keep dancing, Fred Astaire. The point is that Super delegates dominate the Democrat nomination process. The discussion is about voting versus the party. Republicans as poor as the process is are way more dominated by voting than you are. Your dancing isn't changing that
right, the whole thing is designed to allow the elites to control the selection regardless of the votes of the people.
The good thing is that it is being disclosed during this election cycle. Thank you Donald Trump.
IT would come off better if Cryin Donald would criticize all the States before the primaries/caucuses that do that rather than just the ones he lost in afterward
That the number for delegate 379 is missing.And yet still no evidence that anything was rigged. Cruz has an amazing organization and his hard work paid off. Trump showed up at the lady second, did crappy work, and thus won nothing.
But somehow that's the party's fault.
No wonder this country is going to hell. You all want to blame others for why you didn't get what you want when you didn't put any effort into getting it.
Gee how did this happen? Cruz delegate. 378 x2.
379 removed. Trump delegate.
Home - The Gateway Pundit
And what exactly do you think you are showing here?
That the name of the delegates are not shown alongside the number as is mandated by Colorado election laws.
What do you think he is trying to show, Einstein?
So, a typo.
Trump took down the opponents or the opponents self-imploded?
Trump picked up almost no extra support after each of 14 or so opponents dropped out. He still averaged around 35% before NY. In New York, his home state, he finally won big. wow.
Sanders will have his Socialist Workers Party past thrown at him in a general election. Sanders has not been attacked yet. Hillary has been attacked since the 1980s and even in NY where she was accused of carpetbagging, she won a US Senate seat twice.
Trump criticized the rigged nature of the New York primaries both before and after he won the primary, genius.IT would come off better if Cryin Donald would criticize all the States before the primaries/caucuses that do that rather than just the ones he lost in afterward
