TheGreatGatsby
Gold Member
Even the initial libtard media propaganda piece had plenty of clues about this not merely being a "clock." But of course, we were supposed to buy that he was a victim of discrimination; that he was ever so innocent.
And what 'clues' are you referring to? Or are you just going to allude to your entire argument and all of your evidence?
I'm gonna tell you; even though I know you're going to come back with utter retardedness.
1. The first teacher thought it was not just "a clock" and advised the student to not showcase it further.
2. The reporting teacher thought it was not just "a clock."
3. The principal thought it was not just "a clock."
4. Multiple police thought it was not just "a clock."
5. The police department then backed the actions of the officers.
6. The police officer noted that this kid is a serial trouble maker according to the kid's own testimony.
More abstract:
7. The kid then played the I'm picked on cos I'm brown card. Yet, he doesn't want to face certain realities about who is trying to bomb us in the first place? Sorry, but that's bull sh**.