AIPAC to push for war!

[Roudy]

For the record I am against a strike. I think it's useless and counterproductive, and America is being set up for a half assed strike and humiliation just to satisfy Obama's ego and vanity. Two weeks ago would have been the right time for Obama to get on TV and tell the American people that Assad stepped over the one and he got whacked and hard by missiles and American jet fighters.

He has already humiliated America and caused a big risk to American national security. The Iranians are watching and taking notes, so are the N Koreans and those like them.

 

[Hoffstra]

Something that cannot be verified is not a hoax, especially if its in line with the rest of MLKs views, Hamas agent.

yes, folks have been trying to verify this for years.

no one can.

that's why CAMERA calls it a "hoax".

 

[Hoffstra]

AIPAC must be furious that the Congressional vote is now on hold, and Syria might avoid a US attack.

they are surely going crazy!!

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Is AIPAC still waiting for the air strike ? I'd hate to see all those gas masks go to waste.

Chomsky says the Israelis are at the beach. Do they take the gas masks to the beach with them?

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

What am I lying about, IRA agent. You said that Roudy's claim was a lie, and I just showed you a link to make a fool out of yourself AGAIN
What did I lie about ??

the "letter to an anti-zionist friend", is a hoax.

just like you.

How did the IRA get involved with this?

 

[Roudy]

Something that cannot be verified is not a hoax, especially if its in line with the rest of MLKs views, Hamas agent.

yes, folks have been trying to verify this for years.

no one can.

that's why CAMERA calls it a "hoax".

And Camera's assessment is a hoax. Since MLK's other comments were in line with the letter then logically the letter wouldn't be a stretch from the kind of things he's said before.

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=kvr2Cxuh2Wk]Martin Luther King Jr: "Israel... is one of the great outpost of democracy in the world" - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Hoffstra]

And Camera's assessment is a hoax...

wow..

you consider a pro-Israel media watchdog to be lying.

funny how you're soo suspicious of the Joooooos.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

"AIPAC is looking out for us" " Israel, obviously, is not an internal political player. We are merely spectators, alongside the U.S.'s second-largest oil supplier (after Canada), Saudi Arabia; NATO-member Turkey; and Jordan, the traditional Middle East ally. All these countries are awaiting an American assault to rein in Syrian President Bashar Assad's appetite for blood, and, more importantly, his conventional and unconventional capabilities. If the U.S. doesn't attack, it would grant de facto legitimization to the use of weapons of mass destruction, and unlimited permission for Assad to carry out any murderous action he desires without fear of being punished. The interests of the U.S.'s close allies are well represented in Washington, not least by the pro-Israel American Israel Public Affairs Committee.Since Israel does not intervene in internal U.S. matters, AIPAC has now taken it upon itself to wage a political and public campaign to help Obama drum up the support he needs for a short, effective action against Assad... What better way to bring peace and serenity to our conflicted world and to advance the Middle Eastern peace process than to prevent genocide and the use of forbidden weapons while positing yourself on the just, peace-seeking side in this current conflict?AIPAC has always had the best interest of the U.S. at heart. After all, AIPAC is made up of American citizens. The lobby only takes action for the benefit of Israel when the existential interests of Israel and the U.S. coincide. The citizens of Israel owe this organization a debt of gratitude for working to advance peace and security in our region for many years, including in this current conflict." Israel Hayom | AIPAC is looking out for us

 

[MHunterB]

What am I lying about, IRA agent. You said that Roudy's claim was a lie, and I just showed you a link to make a fool out of yourself AGAIN
What did I lie about ??

the "letter to an anti-zionist friend", is a hoax.

just like you.

claims the fraud.......

 

[MHunterB]

What am I lying about, IRA agent. You said that Roudy's claim was a lie, and I just showed you a link to make a fool out of yourself AGAIN
What did I lie about ??

the "letter to an anti-zionist friend", is a hoax.

just like you.

How did the IRA get involved with this?

It makes as much sense as anything that Hoffy scumbag has posted.......

 

[GHook93]

AIPAC to deploy hundreds of lobbyists to push for Syria action - Diplomacy and Defense Israel News Broadcast | Haaretz

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee will send hundreds of activists to push Congress to go to war with Syria.

Forgive them Lord, for they know not what they do.

Hey fucko antisemite FAGGOTS, looks like AIPAC doesn't yield any of the power that you claim they have!!! First, there will not be a war. Second, there will not be a military strike. Third, there won't even be a VOTE in Congress. Fourth, AAAAASSSad will remain in power (which AIPAC for some brain dead reason wanted removed). Fifth, even if there was a vote, the House controlled by the very pro-Israel Republicans would have fortunately bucked AIPAC and voted against the strike, along with many Democrats (most who are pro-Israel also). Not to mention it's very suspect that it would have passed in the senate (hence why Reid delayed the vote). Lastly, I guarantee that AASSSad will keep his chemical weapons in the end!

See faggots like you are either clueless or like to use the so-called let's be friends approach (but only want Israel to disarm and die and don't apply any scrutiny on the Palestinian terrorists and their genocidal dreams of a Jew free world)! See Arabs like you claim in English you want peace, but preach lines from the Protocol of Elders of Zion, the blood libel and death to all Jews in Arabic! You are a dishonest coward!

 

[Roudy]

AIPAC to deploy hundreds of lobbyists to push for Syria action - Diplomacy and Defense Israel News Broadcast | Haaretz

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee will send hundreds of activists to push Congress to go to war with Syria.

Forgive them Lord, for they know not what they do.

Hey fucko antisemite FAGGOTS, looks like AIPAC doesn't yield any of the power that you claim they have!!! First, there will not be a war. Second, there will not be a military strike. Third, there won't even be a VOTE in Congress. Fourth, AAAAASSSad will remain in power (which AIPAC for some brain dead reason wanted removed). Fifth, even if there was a vote, the House controlled by the very pro-Israel Republicans would have fortunately bucked AIPAC and voted against the strike, along with many Democrats (most who are pro-Israel also). Not to mention it's very suspect that it would have passed in the senate (hence why Reid delayed the vote). Lastly, I guarantee that AASSSad will keep his chemical weapons in the end!

See faggots like you are either clueless or like to use the so-called let's be friends approach (but only want Israel to disarm and die and don't apply any scrutiny on the Palestinian terrorists and their genocidal dreams of a Jew free world)! See Arabs like you claim in English you want peace, but preach lines from the Protocol of Elders of Zion, the blood libel and death to all Jews in Arabic! You are a dishonest coward!

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

SOME of the posters are so angry the American people are winning this battle against AIPAC and have stopped US military strikes on Syria from happening. I would recommend to them, if they are Americans, they try loyalty to America over loyalty to Israel. Then, they would find nothing to be so angry about right now.

 

[Roudy]

SOME of the posters are so angry the American people are winning this battle against AIPAC and have stopped US military strikes on Syria from happening. I would recommend to them, if they are Americans, they try loyalty to America over loyalty to Israel. Then, they would find nothing to be so angry about right now.

Cuckoo Munnerlyn:

...if they are Americans, they try loyalty to America over loyalty to Israel.

Antisemitic canard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Antisemitic canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being thoroughly disproved, antisemitic canards are often part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies. According to defense attorney Kenneth S. Stern.

Dual loyalty
A canard found in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, but dating to before that document, is that Jews are more loyal to world Jewry than to their own country. Since the establishment of the state of Israel, this canard has taken the form of accusations that Jewish citizens of countries such as the United States are more loyal to Israel than to their home country.

 

[georgephillip]

A Defeat for All-Powerful Aipac? - Bloomberg

"The Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald recently asked on Twitter: 'Would a House vote against a Syria strike be AIPAC's biggest defeat in Congress in at least a decade?'
Greenwald has, for many years, advertised his profound distaste for Israel, so it's reasonable to assume that he's rooting for the weakening of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the main pro-Israel lobbying organization in Washington.
But his loaded question is a good one, and worth answering. The answer is yes, with one large caveat..."

How would Tel Aviv react to AIPAC's defeat in Syria?
USS Liberty: Contact Page

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013

Israel's support for Obama in the Syrian context focuses on two issues. One is the need for the international community to deter Syrian use of chemical warfare, lest at some point in the future the Assad regime or its successor feel free to deploy chemical weapons against Israel. The second issue is the credibility of Obama's "red lines": Israelis want Obama to be free and motivated to act on his Syria red line because they believe that failure to act will reduce the credibility of his Iran red line, which at the regional strategic level is more important.Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013 - Americans for Peace Now. An explanation for the support of Israel.for military strikes against Syria.

 

[georgephillip]

Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013

Israel's support for Obama in the Syrian context focuses on two issues. One is the need for the international community to deter Syrian use of chemical warfare, lest at some point in the future the Assad regime or its successor feel free to deploy chemical weapons against Israel. The second issue is the credibility of Obama's "red lines": Israelis want Obama to be free and motivated to act on his Syria red line because they believe that failure to act will reduce the credibility of his Iran red line, which at the regional strategic level is more important.Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013 - Americans for Peace Now. An explanation for the support of Israel.for military strikes against Syria.

Your link:

"There are sectors in Congress where Netanyahu and AIPAC probably have more influence than Obama.

"Since Netanyahu and most Israelis support the idea of a punitive US military strike against Syria, there is a certain logic to Israel's involvement in lobbying Congress.

"On the other hand, depending on the outcome of both the congressional vote and, if it happens, the American attack, the high-profile Israeli role poses the risk that Israel will be blamed in the US for whatever goes wrong, somewhat similarly to allegations that it was Israel that dragged the George W. Bush administration into Iraq in 2003."

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, and Iran were all slated for regime change within weeks of 911; maybe how that happened is the Hard Question we should take up first?

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013

Israel's support for Obama in the Syrian context focuses on two issues. One is the need for the international community to deter Syrian use of chemical warfare, lest at some point in the future the Assad regime or its successor feel free to deploy chemical weapons against Israel. The second issue is the credibility of Obama's "red lines": Israelis want Obama to be free and motivated to act on his Syria red line because they believe that failure to act will reduce the credibility of his Iran red line, which at the regional strategic level is more important.Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013 - Americans for Peace Now. An explanation for the support of Israel.for military strikes against Syria.

Your link:

"There are sectors in Congress where Netanyahu and AIPAC probably have more influence than Obama.

"Since Netanyahu and most Israelis support the idea of a punitive US military strike against Syria, there is a certain logic to Israel's involvement in lobbying Congress.

"On the other hand, depending on the outcome of both the congressional vote and, if it happens, the American attack, the high-profile Israeli role poses the risk that Israel will be blamed in the US for whatever goes wrong, somewhat similarly to allegations that it was Israel that dragged the George W. Bush administration into Iraq in 2003."

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, and Iran were all slated for regime change within weeks of 911; maybe how that happened is the Hard Question we should take up first?

That takes me to this question, was 911 also a false flag operation?

 

[Bloodrock44]

Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013

Israel's support for Obama in the Syrian context focuses on two issues. One is the need for the international community to deter Syrian use of chemical warfare, lest at some point in the future the Assad regime or its successor feel free to deploy chemical weapons against Israel. The second issue is the credibility of Obama's "red lines": Israelis want Obama to be free and motivated to act on his Syria red line because they believe that failure to act will reduce the credibility of his Iran red line, which at the regional strategic level is more important.Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013 - Americans for Peace Now. An explanation for the support of Israel.for military strikes against Syria.

Your link:

"There are sectors in Congress where Netanyahu and AIPAC probably have more influence than Obama.

"Since Netanyahu and most Israelis support the idea of a punitive US military strike against Syria, there is a certain logic to Israel's involvement in lobbying Congress.

"On the other hand, depending on the outcome of both the congressional vote and, if it happens, the American attack, the high-profile Israeli role poses the risk that Israel will be blamed in the US for whatever goes wrong, somewhat similarly to allegations that it was Israel that dragged the George W. Bush administration into Iraq in 2003."

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, and Iran were all slated for regime change within weeks of 911; maybe how that happened is the Hard Question we should take up first?

That takes me to this question, was 911 also a false flag operation?

Yes of course, Shia Sherri. Where have you been? Bush and Cheney flew the planes into the towers (wearing yarmulkes and Star of David shoulder patches of course) and parachuted just before impact. The 5 dancing Israelis picked them up in the white van right after they set the charges that imploded the buildings. Are you daft? Never mind.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013

Israel's support for Obama in the Syrian context focuses on two issues. One is the need for the international community to deter Syrian use of chemical warfare, lest at some point in the future the Assad regime or its successor feel free to deploy chemical weapons against Israel. The second issue is the credibility of Obama's "red lines": Israelis want Obama to be free and motivated to act on his Syria red line because they believe that failure to act will reduce the credibility of his Iran red line, which at the regional strategic level is more important.Hard Questions, Tough Answers with Yossi Alpher: September 9, 2013 - Americans for Peace Now. An explanation for the support of Israel.for military strikes against Syria.

Your link:

"There are sectors in Congress where Netanyahu and AIPAC probably have more influence than Obama.

"Since Netanyahu and most Israelis support the idea of a punitive US military strike against Syria, there is a certain logic to Israel's involvement in lobbying Congress.

"On the other hand, depending on the outcome of both the congressional vote and, if it happens, the American attack, the high-profile Israeli role poses the risk that Israel will be blamed in the US for whatever goes wrong, somewhat similarly to allegations that it was Israel that dragged the George W. Bush administration into Iraq in 2003."

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, and Iran were all slated for regime change within weeks of 911; maybe how that happened is the Hard Question we should take up first?

That takes me to this question, was 911 also a false flag operation?

False Flag 911: How Bush, Cheney and the Saudis Created the Post-911 World

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/cr/1439202648/s=sd/ref=mw_dp_cr]Amazon[/ame]. The author of this book was killed for writing this book, along with his family.