All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Roudy]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

They must have a quota for ugly, Muslim terrorist supporters.

 

[P F Tinmore]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

 

[Hollie]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Your juvenile name-calling is a rather poor excuse for your inability to offer a refutation.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Isn't helping a terrorist organization a federal crime?

I like the way they fuzz out the identity of the dog.

 

[P F Tinmore]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Your juvenile name-calling is a rather poor excuse for your inability to offer a refutation.

Refute what? Watch the video.

 

[Hollie]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Your juvenile name-calling is a rather poor excuse for your inability to offer a refutation.

Refute what? Watch the video.

Your usual Islamo-tap dancing.

 

[Shusha]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

 

[P F Tinmore]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

 

[Shusha]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

Nice deflection. The question in the table is the vile and toxic values presented by the questioner.

Do you have thoughts on that?

 

[P F Tinmore]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

Nice deflection. The question in the table is the vile and toxic values presented by the questioner.

Do you have thoughts on that?

Poor naive girl led around by the nose by a professional bullshitter.

 

[Shusha]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

Nice deflection. The question in the table is the vile and toxic values presented by the questioner.

Do you have thoughts on that?

Poor naive girl led around by the nose by a professional bullshitter.

So. No. You have no capacity or interest in discussing her vile and toxic values.

Why is that? Is it because you agree with her values, but don't want to admit that. (In contrast to her honesty, you would rather remain hidden?).

 

[Shusha]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

Nice deflection. The question in the table is the vile and toxic values presented by the questioner.

Do you have thoughts on that?

Poor naive girl led around by the nose by a professional bullshitter.

And she doesn't appear the slightest bit naive to me. She actually seems pretty darn sure of herself.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

Nice deflection. The question in the table is the vile and toxic values presented by the questioner.

Do you have thoughts on that?

Poor naive girl led around by the nose by a professional bullshitter.

So. No. You have no capacity or interest in discussing her vile and toxic values.

Why is that? Is it because you agree with her values, but don't want to admit that. (In contrast to her honesty, you would rather remain hidden?).

I don't, but that was not my point. I was just pointing out that he ducked and deflected like some people always do here.

 

[Indeependent]

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

Nice deflection. The question in the table is the vile and toxic values presented by the questioner.

Do you have thoughts on that?

Poor naive girl led around by the nose by a professional bullshitter.

So. No. You have no capacity or interest in discussing her vile and toxic values.

Why is that? Is it because you agree with her values, but don't want to admit that. (In contrast to her honesty, you would rather remain hidden?).

I don't, but that was not my point. I was just pointing out that he ducked and deflected like some people always do here.

You have had your ass handed to you about 20 times in the last 2 weeks and you simply go back to your revised history Arab sites.

 

[Shusha]

Actually, YOU are the one deflecting from Roudy's post. Roudy wondered why people who hold toxic and vile values, such as that expressed by the woman in the video, are permitted into the US. YOU deflected by commenting about the deflection of the speaker, rather than addressing Roudy's point.

de·flect
dəˈflekt/
verb

1. cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course
2. cause (someone) to deviate from an intended purpose.

To re-iterate, the question posed on the video was: "The head of Hezbollah has said he hopes we (the Jewish people) will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or against?"

Her unabashed, clear, proud response was: "FOR."


The question posed by Roudy was: Why do we permit people with vile and toxic values such as this into the US? Did you care to address that?

The question was about funding. Whorowitz ducked the question and started rattling on about Hamas.

Nice deflection. The question in the table is the vile and toxic values presented by the questioner.

Do you have thoughts on that?

Poor naive girl led around by the nose by a professional bullshitter.

So. No. You have no capacity or interest in discussing her vile and toxic values.

Why is that? Is it because you agree with her values, but don't want to admit that. (In contrast to her honesty, you would rather remain hidden?).

I don't, but that was not my point. I was just pointing out that he ducked and deflected like some people always do here.

So. If you don't have anything to say about the topic brought up in a post, perhaps it would be prudent not to comment on that post.

 

[Roudy]

And why are animals like this ever allowed inside to the US?

Whorowitz is a professional shoveler of shit. He gets asked a question and the first thing he does is deflect.

Just like here.

He exposed the Muslim Brotherhood whore for the scum that she was?

 

[Challenger]

Talking of "whores"....

WORLD WIDE WHITE SLAVE TRADE CENTRED IN ISRAEL

 

[Roudy]

Talking of "whores"....

WORLD WIDE WHITE SLAVE TRADE CENTRED IN ISRAEL

Fake news created by Polish antisemites.

 

[Challenger]

Talking of "whores"....

WORLD WIDE WHITE SLAVE TRADE CENTRED IN ISRAEL

Fake news created by Polish antisemites.

Zionists lie, period; as demonstrated elswehere.