All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

You must really love Genocide Joe. He hates Palis too.
View attachment 905784

1708487357591.png
 

NYPD HARASS Ceasefire Protesters & Journalists, Fly Surveillance Helicopter Above Protests​


 

LIVE: ICJ opens historic hearings into Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories​




LIVE: ICJ hears from Algeria, Saudi Arabia and others on Israeli occupation of Palestine​


 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Palestinian Self-Determination
※→
et al,

Israel did not deny or otherwise refuse to recognize the Arab Palestinian Right to Self-Determination.

Israel did not assume any control over the formerly under Jordanian Sovereign Territorial control and certainly there was no territory anywhere within the former jurisdiction of the Palestinian Order in Council in which an Arab Palestinian Government was in sovereign control.


Just where did the Arab Palestinians find under International Law that Israel must surrender territory to an undefined sovereign control of the Arab Palestinians? When the Jordanians cut all ties in July 1988 with the territory they annexed in 1950, west of the Jordan River, there was no Arab Palestinian Government. That left the territory in the sole hands of the Israelis.

I would remind the Arab Palestinians that it was the Jordanians who seized the West Bank and Jerusalem in 1949. And in the 1967 Conflict (Six-Day War) the Israel Occupied territory that was under Jordanian Sovereignty (not any Arab Palestinian Government).


Prior to the adoption of resolution 67/19, Palestine was treated as an entity for United Nations purposes. Palestine was not identified as a State or a country nor could its authorities be identified as a government. Pursuant to resolution 43/177 of 15 December 1998, the designation "Palestine" was used in place of the designation "Palestinian Liberation

Excerpt • DEC 2012 Legal Affairs Memo said:
1. Prior to the adoption of resolution 67/19, Palestine was treated as an entity for United Nations purposes. Palestine was not identified as a State or a country nor could its authorities be identified as a government. Pursuant to resolution 43/177 of 15 December 1998, the designation "Palestine" was used in place of the designation "Palestinian Liberation Organization" in the United Nations.
SOURCE: Under-Secretary General for Legal Affairs, The Legal Counsel, United Nations, SUBJECT:
Issues related to General Assembly Resolution 67/19 on the status of Palestine in the UN.

This was the opening paragraph to the Memo (attached below) the bottom line up front. It should be required reading for every single Arab Palestinian.
1708521992664.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 

Attachments

  • Memo 2012 pertaining to the Resolution 67:19 .pdf
    761.1 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Palestinian Self-Determination
※→
et al,

Israel did not deny or otherwise refuse to recognize the Arab Palestinian Right to Self-Determination.

Israel did not assume any control over the formerly under Jordanian Sovereign Territorial control and certainly there was no territory anywhere within the former jurisdiction of the Palestinian Order in Council in which an Arab Palestinian Government was in sovereign control.


Just where did the Arab Palestinians find under International Law that Israel must surrender territory to an undefined sovereign control of the Arab Palestinians? When the Jordanians cut all ties in July 1988 with the territory they annexed in 1950, west of the Jordan River, there was no Arab Palestinian Government. That left the territory in the sole hands of the Israelis.

I would remind the Arab Palestinians that it was the Jordanians who seized the West Bank and Jerusalem in 1949. And in the 1967 Conflict (Six-Day War) the Israel Occupied territory that was under Jordanian Sovereignty (not any Arab Palestinian Government).


Prior to the adoption of resolution 67/19, Palestine was treated as an entity for United Nations purposes. Palestine was not identified as a State or a country nor could its authorities be identified as a government. Pursuant to resolution 43/177 of 15 December 1998, the designation "Palestine" was used in place of the designation "Palestinian Liberation



This was the opening paragraph to the Memo (attached below) the bottom line up front. It should be required reading for every single Arab Palestinian.
View attachment 905966

Most Respectfully,
R
You keep confusing military control with sovereignty. Remember that occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

The people are the sovereigns within their defined territory. Governments and states are mere extensions of the people's sovereignty.
 
You keep confusing military control with sovereignty. Remember that occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

The people are the sovereigns within their defined territory. Governments and states are mere extensions of the people's sovereignty.

And the people with no defined territory and no sovereignty keep losing.
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Palestinian Self-Determination
※→ et al,

To say - "still hold the sovereignty" implies they once had sovereignty. That is simply disinformation; deceptive to the audience and deceptive to one's self.


The Palestinians still hold the sovereignty within their international borders.
(COMMENT)

Yes, this is that bogus argument where you describe the perimeter of THE "Palestine" subject to the Order in Council. That was not a country. It was a Mandate boundary. Israel established a country under the Right of Self-Determination.

At midnight on May 14, 1948, the Provisional Government of Israel proclaimed a new State of Israel. On that same date, the United States recognized the provisional Jewish government as de facto authority of the Jewish state (de jure recognition was extended on January 31, 1949).

The political aspect of the Provisional Government governed with sovereignty while the Israeli Defense Forcer secured the territory.

I guess P F Tinmore did not read the UN Memo.

1708521992664.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 

Breaking news and analysis on day 138 of the Gaza's Al-Aqsa Flood | The Electronic Intifada Podcast​


 

Forum List

Back
Top