All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: UN Calls Israel To Investigate...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BOMBSHELL: UN Calls Israel To Investigate Allegations Of 'Execution' Of 11 Unarmed Palestinians​

(COMMENT)

This is a case of:

◈ Selective allegation​

◈ Selective Prosecution​

◈ Selective Enforcement​

​

The UN is NOT and never has been anything other than anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian in its collective political position.

Until the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) are held accountable for the terrorist activities conducted:

◈ Since the 1970 1970 hijacking of B-727 Olympic Airways Flight 255​

◈ Since the 1973 Attack on the Israeli Olympic Team -​

◈ Since the 1973 Rome-Fiumicino Airport Attack​

◈ Since the 1978 Coastal Road massacre -​

◈ Since the 1985 Piracy takeover of the MS Achille Lauro -​

◈ Since the many - many Bombings against the Israeli general Population -​

◈ Since the many - many ground incursions and attacks -​

◈ Since the thousand and thousand of rocket and mortar attacks -​

The Israelis can make a list of violations of Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL): (to name the obvious few of the many violations)

Rule 11 - Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited...​

Rule 20 - Each party to the conflict must give effective advance warning of attacks which may affect the civilian population, unless circumstances do not permit...​

Rule 23 - Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas...​

Rule 24 - Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, remove civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of military objectives...​

Rule 96 - The taking of hostages is prohibited...​

Rule 97 - The use of human shields is prohibited...​

And it should be note that the mere attacks on the Israelis is a violation:

(ie Internationa Humanitarian Law)

Protected persons (Arab Palestinians) who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israel), but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.​

​

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.​

​

The death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person unless the attention of the court has been particularly called to the fact that since the accused is not a national of the Occupying Power, he is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance.​

No matter what the HoAP says, a prima facie case can be made that the Arab Palestinians have violated many many more aspects of Customary and International Humanitarian Law than the Israelis.

"The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began."​

Additionally, the Arab Palestinians have violated Human Rights Law (HRL) that Entered into force: 23 March 1976 (almost a half-century ago):

Article 20 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

AND - Hamas makes the point that they:

20. Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea.​

​

​

And make no mistake, The Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) has a policy of Jihadism going back to 1988:

◈ The Slogan: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes​

​

◈ The Strategy: There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.​

In the three decades since the Slogan, the Policy and the Strategy was written, HAMAS has incorporated other like minded organizations within the Arab Palestinian people: Jihadists, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters.

Finally: There is the question as to the complicity of the general Arab Palestinians in the facilitation of support for the Islamic Resistance that orchestrated multiple Jihadist attacks against Israel in nearly every engagement. It should be noted that the Arab Palestinians openly provide for ways to fund their activities –

◈ Propaganda,​

◈ Financial assistance,​

◈ Acquisition of Missiles and missile launchers; and Small arms and light weapons,​

◈ Terror attacks,​

◈ Recruitment,​

◈ Cover and Concealment in prohibited areas, densely populated areas, and humanitarian facilities,​

​

For anyone, anywhere in the world, to defend not only the HoAP but the General Population of Arab Palestinians is (in itself) questionable in terms of moral and ethical value. Israel suffered (Oct 2023) over 1000 killed - in perspective - the US suffered ≈ 2000+ killed on the Day of Infamy (Dec 1941). While the death toll in the Pearl Harbor surprise attack was twice that the Israelis suffered in the invasion of Israel, the impact was just as devastating. And the Israeli response to the HASAM invasion was just as reactive.

I have no sympathy for Islamic Resistance and the complicit General Population that facilitated such an act - to fire 3000 rockets (indiscriminately - Rule # 11) and launch an invasion (Article 51) into sovereign territory.

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. (To my knowledge, the Security Council has not launched any force that would be "necessary to maintain international peace and security" in that region.)

​

Most Respectfully,
R
[/QUOTE]

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: UN Calls Israel To Investigate...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,



(COMMENT)

This is a case of:

◈ Selective allegation​

◈ Selective Prosecution​

◈ Selective Enforcement​

​

The UN is NOT and never has been anything other than anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian in its collective political position.

Until the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) are held accountable for the terrorist activities conducted:

◈ Since the 1970 1970 hijacking of B-727 Olympic Airways Flight 255​

◈ Since the 1973 Attack on the Israeli Olympic Team -​

◈ Since the 1973 Rome-Fiumicino Airport Attack​

◈ Since the 1978 Coastal Road massacre -​

◈ Since the 1985 Piracy takeover of the MS Achille Lauro -​

◈ Since the many - many Bombings against the Israeli general Population -​

◈ Since the many - many ground incursions and attacks -​

◈ Since the thousand and thousand of rocket and mortar attacks -​

The Israelis can make a list of violations of Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL): (to name the obvious few of the many violations)

Rule 11 - Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited...​

Rule 20 - Each party to the conflict must give effective advance warning of attacks which may affect the civilian population, unless circumstances do not permit...​

Rule 23 - Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas...​

Rule 24 - Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, remove civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of military objectives...​

Rule 96 - The taking of hostages is prohibited...​

Rule 97 - The use of human shields is prohibited...​

And it should be note that the mere attacks on the Israelis is a violation:

No matter what the HoAP says, a prima facie case can be made that the Arab Palestinians have violated many many more aspects of Customary and International Humanitarian Law than the Israelis.

"The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began."​

Additionally, the Arab Palestinians have violated Human Rights Law (HRL) that Entered into force: 23 March 1976 (almost a half-century ago):

Article 20 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

AND - Hamas makes the point that they:

​

And make no mistake, The Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) has a policy of Jihadism going back to 1988:

◈ The Slogan: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes​

​

◈ The Strategy: There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.​

In the three decades since the Slogan, the Policy and the Strategy was written, HAMAS has incorporated other like minded organizations within the Arab Palestinian people: Jihadists, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters.

Finally: There is the question as to the complicity of the general Arab Palestinians in the facilitation of support for the Islamic Resistance that orchestrated multiple Jihadist attacks against Israel in nearly every engagement. It should be noted that the Arab Palestinians openly provide for ways to fund their activities –

◈ Propaganda,​

◈ Financial assistance,​

◈ Acquisition of Missiles and missile launchers; and Small arms and light weapons,​

◈ Terror attacks,​

◈ Recruitment,​

◈ Cover and Concealment in prohibited areas, densely populated areas, and humanitarian facilities,​

​

For anyone, anywhere in the world, to defend not only the HoAP but the General Population of Arab Palestinians is (in itself) questionable in terms of moral and ethical value. Israel suffered (Oct 2023) over 1000 killed - in perspective - the US suffered ≈ 2000+ killed on the Day of Infamy (Dec 1941). While the death toll in the Pearl Harbor surprise attack was twice that the Israelis suffered in the invasion of Israel, the impact was just as devastating. And the Israeli response to the HASAM invasion was just as reactive.

I have no sympathy for Islamic Resistance and the complicit General Population that facilitated such an act - to fire 3000 rockets (indiscriminately - Rule # 11) and launch an invasion (Article 51) into sovereign territory.

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. (To my knowledge, the Security Council has not launched any force that would be "necessary to maintain international peace and security" in that region.)

​

Most Respectfully,
R

[/QUOTE]
Indeed, there has been a lot of back and forth since the Zionist invasion.

 

[P F Tinmore]

South Africa Takes ISRAEL to International Court of Justice For Crimes of GENOCIDE!!!​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Pro-Palestine Protest Shutdown New York | Penn Station New York ​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Lee Camp EXPOSES Paid Actors For Israel (clip)​

 

[P F Tinmore]

STOP THE WAR and Free Palestina Sit in Utrecht Central Station The Netherlands​

 

[P F Tinmore]

#FreePalestine Rally: Thousands March in Response to Israel-Hamas War | Australian Lights & Sirens​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Pro-Palestine Protests Gather Thousands Around Globe Over Weekend | 10 News First​

 

[P F Tinmore]

World's leading legal EXPERT on GENOCIDE gives his opinion on ISRAEL'S WAR in GAZA. #gaza​

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Genocide...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is largely one of those opinions that are designed to reflect a bandwagon opinion.

World's leading legal EXPERT on GENOCIDE gives his opinion on ISRAEL'S WAR in GAZA. #gaza​

(COMMENT ONE)

This video segment is one in which no opposing view is presented. It is just one aspect in which the principle (and only) source presents a fallacy - claiming an allegation driven by a (supposed) popular opinion that is often driven by the media and the anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian contingent.

(COMMENT TWO)

(First Blood Concept)
The outbreak of hostilities was initiated, advanced, and then accelerated by the hostile actions of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) in an unmistakeable violation of Customary and International Humanitarian Law - to wit:

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offenses which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offenses were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.

In an armed action since the 1948 Israeli War for Independence, The Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS), the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (all four of which are designated terrorist organizations) invaded the State of Israel. The invasion (7 OCT 23) was pursuant to Strategy outlined in the Covenant and General Policies of the Islamic Resistance.

On 7 October 2023, the paramilitary wings of Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the PFLP, and the DFLP launched a series of coordinated armed incursions into the Gaza envelope of neighboring Israeli territory, the first invasion of Israel since the 1948 Arab–Israeli War.

A terrorist Group has no standing that would justify the indiscriminate launch of thousands of rockets and a coordinated air, sea, and ground attack that involved the killing, maiming, sexual violence, and kidnapping of unarmed civilians in sovereign territory.

It should be noted that the General Population of the Arab Palestinians in the immediate part of the affected region support the HAMAS attack.

Dec 13 (Reuters) - Almost three in four Palestinians believe the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas on Israel was correct, and the ensuing Gaza war has lifted support for the Islamist group both there and in the West Bank, a survey from a respected Palestinian polling institute found.

The Palestinian Center for Policy Survey and Research (PCPSR) findings were published as international alarm grows over the spiralling Palestinian civilian toll in the Israeli counter-offensive against Hamas, now in its third month.

EXCERPT: Definition of "Aggression:"
Article ONE
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.

AND
EXCERPT: Definition of "Aggression:"

Article TWO
The first use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter, conclude that a determination that an act of aggression has been committed would not be justified in the light of other relevant circumstances, including the fact that the acts concerned or their consequences are not of sufficient gravity.

[/quote]

There is much more that supports this opinion. But I'll stop here.

 

[P F Tinmore]

#FreePalastine Berlin Central Station today​

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

#FreePalastine Berlin Central Station today​

It's true, Germany took in too many muslim refugees in the last decade.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Panic in Israel! Four African Nations Block Israel's Access to Red Sea; This is Huge!​

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Genocide... #2 (It is all connected.)
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This whole idea of the anti-Isrealis and pro-Palestinians in Berlin GERMANY is not all that surprising. As several cosmologist have suggested THAT if for no other reason, we are all connected through the stellar material we are composed of.

It's true, Germany took in too many muslim refugees in the last decade.

(COMMENT)

The General Ottoman (Muslim) community have had a a long standing connection with the German and latter the NAZI Regime (anti-Jewish) with some prominent Palestinian and close associates.

◈ Hajj Amin al-Husseini, Head of the Spreme Islamic Council and the Grand Mufti-of Jerusalem - who supported the pro-Nazi Iraq Coup of 1941. During that time period, more than 80% of the Arab Palestinian was pro-NAZI. (And it is not because they wanted to help the Jewish people.)​

​

◈ Ahmed Hilmi (Abd al-Baq), Prime Minister of the All Palestine Government, Ahmed Hilmi was denied re-entry (from Lebanon) to the Mandated Territory as a NAZI collaborator.​

​

◈ Hasan Salama, Commander of the Holy War Army during the 1948 War of Israeli Independence. Salama was a Senior advisor and Military Aid to the Grand Multi on the state visit to Germany.​

​

◈ Fawzi al-Qawuqji, Commander of the Arab Liberation Army of Palestine, was a full Colonel (Wehrmacht) during WWII and assigned to a Special Staff (F) while in the Ottomon Palestine.​

​

etc​

etc​

etc​

When I see such crowds in a Mass Transit Terminal (Berlin Station) protesting against Jews (without any major incidents), I have raised eye brows.

You might have noticed that there are more than just one or two Arab Palestinians, pro-Arab Palestinians, and anti-Israelis that bring up some comparison between the Israelis and the NAZIs.

Well!

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

2024 Cardiff demanded a ceasefire in Gaza at the moment the city rang in the New Year​

 

[rylah]

"Free Palestine" shout Alulahu Akhbar at the WTC

 

[P F Tinmore]

Calls for Gaza ceasefire ring out as world enters 2024 | Al Jazeera Newsfeed​

 

[toomuchtime_]

Calls for Gaza ceasefire ring out as world enters 2024 | Al Jazeera Newsfeed​

Clearly, Trump was right about limiting immigration from Muslim countries.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Clearly, Trump was right about limiting immigration from Muslim countries.

The civilized nations need to deport many of their recent Muslim invaders.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Genocide...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is largely one of those opinions that are designed to reflect a bandwagon opinion.


(COMMENT ONE)

This video segment is one in which no opposing view is presented. It is just one aspect in which the principle (and only) source presents a fallacy - claiming an allegation driven by a (supposed) popular opinion that is often driven by the media and the anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian contingent.

(COMMENT TWO)

(First Blood Concept)
The outbreak of hostilities was initiated, advanced, and then accelerated by the hostile actions of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) in an unmistakeable violation of Customary and International Humanitarian Law - to wit:


In an armed action since the 1948 Israeli War for Independence, The Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS), the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (all four of which are designated terrorist organizations) invaded the State of Israel. The invasion (7 OCT 23) was pursuant to Strategy outlined in the Covenant and General Policies of the Islamic Resistance.

On 7 October 2023, the paramilitary wings of Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the PFLP, and the DFLP launched a series of coordinated armed incursions into the Gaza envelope of neighboring Israeli territory, the first invasion of Israel since the 1948 Arab–Israeli War.

A terrorist Group has no standing that would justify the indiscriminate launch of thousands of rockets and a coordinated air, sea, and ground attack that involved the killing, maiming, sexual violence, and kidnapping of unarmed civilians in sovereign territory.

It should be noted that the General Population of the Arab Palestinians in the immediate part of the affected region support the HAMAS attack.




AND
EXCERPT: Definition of "Aggression:"

There is much more that supports this opinion. But I'll stop here.
[/QUOTE]
UN General Assembly Resolution A/Res/3314 (XXIX) said:
EXCERPT: Definition of "Aggression:"

Article ONE
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.​

It is interesting that you would post this. Palestine became a state according to post war treaties in 1924. The Zionists/Israel attacked Palestine in 1947 and conquered 78% of Palestine by 1949. Israel has never acquired clear title to this land. It remains unceded Palestinian territory.