All You Bundy Lovers....Your New Hero Speaks....Shoots Self in Foot

ummm ... there's no twisting words. He said they may have been better off as slaves picking cotton. That's a racist mutherfker

He would have to blame them for their current situation for it to be racist. he would have to say they are like that BECAUSE they are black for it to be racist.

I consider the welfare system to be the biggest hurdle to the improvement of black american society and culture. is that racist?
 
I do find it amazing that all the liberals can rant on and on and on about Bundy being a welfare queen, when Al Sharpton owes double if not triple in back taxes a we hear crickets.

Why aren't the same people who think Bundy's cattle, his ranch, his family and his supporters should all be blown away screaming for Al Sharpton and his family to be surrounded by 200 armed men, 9 helicopters and snipers to collect Al's long over due tax debt?

Hypocrisy thy name is liberal.

They both owe money

Doesn't justify the racist Bundy continuing to receive government handouts while he condemns "negroes" who are on welfare

Where did he condemn anyone?
 
Right and when he said blacks were better off picking cotton thats totally reasonable.

Remember that the next time you wonder to yourself why blacks dont vote for republicans who believe that slavery was pretty good for blacks

Plenty of black people picked cotton without being slaves. That was their job as agricultural workers. Black people were replaced by Hispanics. Now black people are unemployed living off welfare. Hispanics now pick cotton.

Nice spin! But it doesnt change the fact that you ignored he said blacks were better off as slaves but its fun to see you chase your tail like this

Again, he didn't say that. he wondered if they were better off then compared to now, where they are wards of the government instead of some asshole planter.
 
One is burdened by a plantation owner, the other is burdened by govt. Both are shackled and yolked. It is up to that individual to throw off such burdens.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
And another tea party conservative clings to old Southern ideals and thoughts.
 
No wonder Republicans have a hard time seeing racism or racist thoughts. They just spin everything and pretend they are "serious" discussions.

Actually, we don't have a problem seeing it. it's just far more common on the left than the right.
 
Bundy folks, seriously accept that a guy can be for less federal control and be a raving racist at the same time.

Again, I think most would be open to exploring how states could be given more power to care for public land, but lose the racist pos.

I will go even further. I think the discussion he has prompted could become a very valuable one in terms of reviewing grazing fees, the amount and management of public land, and "environmental" restrictions. And his views on race really have no bearing on any of those discussions at all.

But none of that changes the fact that he is not entitled to free feed for his cattle. All Americans own that land and are entitled to compensation for allowing this guy to pursue his commercial venture on our land. If he refuses to pay what he owes (to the people he owes the money to) then the consequences are justified.

He says he'll pay the state of Nevada or the county the grazing fees. (although he hasn't paid them anything) But he doesn't owe JUST the people of Nevada or of Clark County - he owes ALL Americans.

I'm open to the discussion of the legitimate questions that have been raised. But I am resolute in my position that he should pay what he owes or get his cattle tossed off our land.
 
Last edited:
ummm ... there's no twisting words. He said they may have been better off as slaves picking cotton. That's a racist mutherfker

He would have to blame them for their current situation for it to be racist. he would have to say they are like that BECAUSE they are black for it to be racist.

I consider the welfare system to be the biggest hurdle to the improvement of black american society and culture. is that racist?

if you think they were better off as slaves, then you'd be a racist. If you think the welfare system stifles self reliance ... no. But, on the other hand, there's no logic in denying some people really do need public assistance because they really are incapable of making it on their own. It's not a one side is right and the other is wrong issue.

But again, most sane people would be open to seeing if states can better steward public land. However, that issue is different from one crazy old racist.
 
Typical idiot liberal. Because we support human rights and don't like government aggression, to the limited liberal mind it means we love the guy and we espouse everything he thinks and says.

You really have to have a diminished mental capacity to be liberal.

From the Department of Redundancy Department:

"Idiot Liberal"

the raw hate put out by people like Reid and their base over one citizen rancher, is some sad shit

Because lifting up the rock to show what Bundy is like is "raw hate".....:eusa_whistle:
 
I don't care if Bundy is a racist. It has nothing to due with his current issues. Though I do find it stupid that a man who inherited his land, grazes his cattle on other's land, and refuses to pay for it has a negative view on welfare.
 
How is this having it both ways? Did he out and out say he hated black people? From what I have read is the reporter asked him his position on the welfare state, and he replied.

Yes his language was crude. He's an older guy, and I run into that from older people of all races. Every listen to an old black man (who as Chris Rock says, experienced ACTUAL racism) talk about white people when he thinks no one is listening?

Congrats. progressives have their "gotcha" moment. Now instead of arguing the merits of the debate they can call him a racist and absolve themselves of ever having to make another actual point in the discussion. Maybe next we will find out he doesn't like gay marriage and we can round up a lynch mob.

I'm saying it doesn't sound like you're particularly horrified by his words at all, so don't say that you are. That is all.

If I were standing next to him I would be horrified (or at least mortified) but as I am all about the rules when it comes to government, I am all about intent when it comes to language.

You don't bring up cotton picking and black people in the same thought. that's wrong no matter what point you are trying to bring up. He's intent was not to say black people should go back to picking cotton, which is what the progs here are alluding to.

From what I read his question was, (and keep in mind he was asked about the welfare state by the reporter) that people on it, (and yes he used the word Negro, considering the UNCF is still around that can't be offensive) is there any difference between slavery in the old days and the current system of people being dependent on the government.

that (in red) is POLITICAL CORRECTNESS......i.e., thought and speech control....
 
you're the dumbo.....all Bundy was talking about was the different work ethic of blacks today vs black slaves of the past.....

oooooooh.....he said 'slaves'.......QUICK....pull out the RACE CARD !

idiot Dimwit....:eusa_hand:

Right and when he said blacks were better off picking cotton thats totally reasonable.

Remember that the next time you wonder to yourself why blacks dont vote for republicans who believe that slavery was pretty good for blacks

as usual you Dims set up a false comparison....twisting a man's words...

the primary comparison presented by Bundy is not between being free or a slave.....it's between working and not working...

...in a cotton field as a slave
 
Blacks just shouldn't have to work at all. It enslaves them. Better to sit around showing off the bling they got through their various criminal enterprises.
 
this isn't about Bundy. its about an armed Militia that stood up to a illegal socialist regeime. its the Militia I back and if needed ill help supply them with money for more weapons to kill these cockroach's

Naw.

It's about a racist, tax cheating crimelord and the anti-American terrorists who showed up armed to his ranch.

Sharpton has a ranch? Who knew?
 
One is burdened by a plantation owner, the other is burdened by govt. Both are shackled and yolked. It is up to that individual to throw off such burdens.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
And another tea party conservative clings to old Southern ideals and thoughts.

That really wasn't directed at you. That's a tad difficult for your comprehension.
 
The Party of "I'll have them ******* voting Democrat for the next 200 years" and had a KKK Grand Kleagle as Senate Majority Leader wants to talk about racism?

OK, let's talk
 
Right and when he said blacks were better off picking cotton thats totally reasonable.

Remember that the next time you wonder to yourself why blacks dont vote for republicans who believe that slavery was pretty good for blacks

as usual you Dims set up a false comparison....twisting a man's words...

the primary comparison presented by Bundy is not between being free or a slave.....it's between working and not working...

...in a cotton field as a slave

well that's what they used to do.....fact....
 
I realize you are suffering from George Zimmerman withdrawal syndrome, but it's so nice that your new hero is speaking up and revealing himself as the true American he...and you stupid rednecks...perceive him to be:


“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.

“And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/u...ming-a-hero-in-the-west.html?hpw&rref=us&_r=0

He may be closer to the truth than any fucking dimocrap.

That's what bothers you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top