Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have not read the fine print on any laws and I am not defending those laws.Have you read the fine print on how broadly the law will be enforced, as in basically any protests against chemical,oil, gas or other corporations like the Koch brothers whose oil refineries and paper mills alone pollute the air and water in hundreds of locations ? Say.You wrongly assume that oil pipelines = contaminated water. That's a faulty assumption.Yeah fuck people who just want clean water . This is Oilmerika.
.
So if a landowner refusing to give them the right-of-way invites a crowd of protestors to his or her property, that should be okay right ? It works both ways.I have not read the fine print on any laws and I am not defending those laws.Have you read the fine print on how broadly the law will be enforced, as in basically any protests against chemical,oil, gas or other corporations like the Koch brothers whose oil refineries and paper mills alone pollute the air and water in hundreds of locations ? Say.You wrongly assume that oil pipelines = contaminated water. That's a faulty assumption.Yeah fuck people who just want clean water . This is Oilmerika.
.
I am saying that the people deliberately standing in the way of rightful action on private property are doing so wrongfully.
.
The entity trying to illegally deprive another of his land would be in the wrong.So if a landowner refusing to give them the right-of-way invites a crowd of protestors to his or her property, that should be okay right ? It works both ways.
This is war, whether it's Venezuela, Iraq, Syria, Somalia or here.The entity trying to illegally deprive another of his land would be in the wrong.So if a landowner refusing to give them the right-of-way invites a crowd of protestors to his or her property, that should be okay right ? It works both ways.
My understanding is that the oil companies already owned an easement across said land owner's land. To block oil company from using that easement is wrong. The land owner has no right to do that.
.
What is war? Meeting the demands of energy?This is war, whether it's Venezuela, Iraq, Syria, Somalia or here.
Where did I say that?10 years in prison seems light to you ?
I didn't say that either.Maybe when there's a big protest we should call in the FBI and Waco the motherfuckers.
Yes we have a government of, for, and by the big corporations and extreme wealthy.After Standing Rock, protesting pipelines can get you a decade in prison and $100K in fines
Here's a snip from the article;
The effort to punish pipeline protestors has spread across states with ample oil and gas reserves in the last two years and, in some cases, has garnered bipartisan support. Besides Louisiana, four other states — Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota and Iowa — have enacted similar laws after protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline generated national attention and inspired a wave of civil disobedience.
Just last week in Texas, House lawmakers passed a bill that makes interfering with some oil and gas operations a third-degree felony — on par with indecent exposure to a child.
Lawmakers in at least seven other states, including Minnesota, Kentucky, and Illinois, are considering similar legislation.
Has become?
When will Americans wake up to this fact?
Show me your papers.A better question would be is this still the USA or the UCA now?Do those protesters have the right to stop people from the free use and enjoyment of their own property?
United Corporations of America it looks like.
" A lotta stems in this shit man."Show me your papers.A better question would be is this still the USA or the UCA now?Do those protesters have the right to stop people from the free use and enjoyment of their own property?
United Corporations of America it looks like.
A better question would be is this still the USA or the UCA now?Do those protesters have the right to stop people from the free use and enjoyment of their own property?
United Corporations of America it looks like.
Where did that come from?Show me your papers.A better question would be is this still the USA or the UCA now?Do those protesters have the right to stop people from the free use and enjoyment of their own property?
United Corporations of America it looks like.
After Standing Rock, protesting pipelines can get you a decade in prison and $100K in fines
Here's a snip from the article;
The effort to punish pipeline protestors has spread across states with ample oil and gas reserves in the last two years and, in some cases, has garnered bipartisan support. Besides Louisiana, four other states — Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota and Iowa — have enacted similar laws after protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline generated national attention and inspired a wave of civil disobedience.
Just last week in Texas, House lawmakers passed a bill that makes interfering with some oil and gas operations a third-degree felony — on par with indecent exposure to a child.
Lawmakers in at least seven other states, including Minnesota, Kentucky, and Illinois, are considering similar legislation.
In the first example in the article given the link to, it was not the oil company's property, it was a private owner's.... the protesters had permission, yet some were arrested anyway...Do those protesters have the right to stop people from the free use and enjoyment of their own property?After Standing Rock, protesting pipelines can get you a decade in prison and $100K in fines
Here's a snip from the article;
The effort to punish pipeline protestors has spread across states with ample oil and gas reserves in the last two years and, in some cases, has garnered bipartisan support. Besides Louisiana, four other states — Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota and Iowa — have enacted similar laws after protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline generated national attention and inspired a wave of civil disobedience.
Just last week in Texas, House lawmakers passed a bill that makes interfering with some oil and gas operations a third-degree felony — on par with indecent exposure to a child.
Lawmakers in at least seven other states, including Minnesota, Kentucky, and Illinois, are considering similar legislation.
Though the protesters were on private land with the landowner’s permission
Have you read the fine print on how broadly the law will be enforced, as in basically any protests against chemical,oil, gas or other corporations like the Koch brothers whose oil refineries and paper mills alone pollute the air and water in hundreds of locations ? Say.You wrongly assume that oil pipelines = contaminated water. That's a faulty assumption.Yeah fuck people who just want clean water . This is Oilmerika.
.
I don't know if they did, or they did not....? I was just correcting your claim or comment, that it was the oil company's private land to do as they wish.... is what you implied?So, you're telling me that the people laying the pipeline had no right to do so?In the first example in the article given the link to, it was not the oil company's property, it was a private owner's.... the protesters had permission, yet some were arrested anyway...Do those protesters have the right to stop people from the free use and enjoyment of their own property?After Standing Rock, protesting pipelines can get you a decade in prison and $100K in fines
Here's a snip from the article;
The effort to punish pipeline protestors has spread across states with ample oil and gas reserves in the last two years and, in some cases, has garnered bipartisan support. Besides Louisiana, four other states — Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota and Iowa — have enacted similar laws after protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline generated national attention and inspired a wave of civil disobedience.
Just last week in Texas, House lawmakers passed a bill that makes interfering with some oil and gas operations a third-degree felony — on par with indecent exposure to a child.
Lawmakers in at least seven other states, including Minnesota, Kentucky, and Illinois, are considering similar legislation.
Though the protesters were on private land with the landowner’s permission
.
You wrongly assume that oil pipelines = contaminated water. That's a faulty assumption.Yeah fuck people who just want clean water . This is Oilmerika.
.
Are you sure ?Pipelines are actually the safest way to move petroleum, and modern ones have multiple detectors to pick up on a leak.
We should be advancing fusion (an energy with a future).After Standing Rock, protesting pipelines can get you a decade in prison and $100K in fines
Here's a snip from the article;
The effort to punish pipeline protestors has spread across states with ample oil and gas reserves in the last two years and, in some cases, has garnered bipartisan support. Besides Louisiana, four other states — Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota and Iowa — have enacted similar laws after protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline generated national attention and inspired a wave of civil disobedience.
Just last week in Texas, House lawmakers passed a bill that makes interfering with some oil and gas operations a third-degree felony — on par with indecent exposure to a child.
Lawmakers in at least seven other states, including Minnesota, Kentucky, and Illinois, are considering similar legislation.
Are you sure ?Pipelines are actually the safest way to move petroleum, and modern ones have multiple detectors to pick up on a leak.
List of pipeline accidents in the United States in 2019 - Wikipedia
30 Years of Oil and Gas Pipeline Spills, Mapped - CityLab
Like that guy that set himself on fire in Tunisia and helped kick off the Arab Spring ?Real protesters would take the hit, do the time and come back out again and do it all over.
Like that guy that set himself on fire in Tunisia and helped kick off the Arab Spring ?Real protesters would take the hit, do the time and come back out again and do it all over.
