🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

'America Was Never That Great’

Cuomo's spoiled rich ass owes everything to America. I swear, i can't stand pompous Limousine Liberal wankers.
Idiot forgets there’s no bigger spoiled rich ass than the thin skinned whiny little bitch pussygrabber.

Obviously you SHOULDN’T be able to stand your fuhrer but since you know you’ll never have another white supremacist prez again you’ll hold onto this one.
 
So many on the left are simply despicable
Grampa thinks America was great when women couldn’t vote.
/——/ Dems think America was great when they held slaves.
Deplorables think America was great in the 1950’s when blacks knew their place and women were frowned on from leaving the kitchen.
/——-/ democRATs fought to block women’s right to vote and filibustered the CRA and VRA. Republicans got them passed. Do your homework before you post your tripe.
If you are intent on homework you would realize parties and ideological affiliations are not the same.
/——/ Gee thanks Captain Obvious
 
The Right completely continues to ignore the difference between actual socialism (Venezuela) and social democracy (Scandanavia, Canada, Europe, Australia).

The only question is, are they being intellectually dishonest, or do they really not know?
.

A little bit of cancer vs a whole lot of cancer. That is the difference, and results in the same bad outcome. Once a socialist program is instituted, it is virtually impossible to pull back without hurting a whole lot of people. And, there is a very broad menu of socialist programs available for the next step into the mire. The slippery slope into societal failure, or dictatorship.
We haven't seen Canada, Finland, Sweden, Germany, Britain, France or Australia descend into a dictatorship.

I understand the concept of a slippery slope, of course, but there just isn't a significant track record of this.
.

Cancers can exist for a very long time before the ultimate end arrives. However, the end will arrive.
 
The Right completely continues to ignore the difference between actual socialism (Venezuela) and social democracy (Scandanavia, Canada, Europe, Australia).

The only question is, are they being intellectually dishonest, or do they really not know?
.

A little bit of cancer vs a whole lot of cancer. That is the difference, and results in the same bad outcome. Once a socialist program is instituted, it is virtually impossible to pull back without hurting a whole lot of people. And, there is a very broad menu of socialist programs available for the next step into the mire. The slippery slope into societal failure, or dictatorship.
We haven't seen Canada, Finland, Sweden, Germany, Britain, France or Australia descend into a dictatorship.

I understand the concept of a slippery slope, of course, but there just isn't a significant track record of this.
.
100% accurate but Cell blockhead thinks it’s funny.
 
It serves the purpose of some to conflate the two.
That's my guess. But talk radio makes no distinction, so I wonder if they're just not exposed to the difference. It's a terribly binary universe.
.
/——/ democRAT socialists don’t have to fund their national security. We do. They can afford the socialism.
Since I have no idea what your particular definition of "socialism" is, or to what you compare it, I have no idea what that means.
.
/——/ as outlined by the other poster Venezuela vs Europe
Great. What the Left wants is a Euro-social democracy.

So you don't have to worry about real socialism now.
.
/——/ Then let the left move there and leave us alone. Why the need to force their ideology on us who oppose it?
 
It serves the purpose of some to conflate the two.
That's my guess. But talk radio makes no distinction, so I wonder if they're just not exposed to the difference. It's a terribly binary universe.
.
/——/ democRAT socialists don’t have to fund their national security. We do. They can afford the socialism.
Since I have no idea what your particular definition of "socialism" is, or to what you compare it, I have no idea what that means.
.
/——/ as outlined by the other poster Venezuela vs Europe
Great. What the Left wants is a Euro-social democracy.

So you don't have to worry about real socialism now.
.
The left should just buy a dildo, sit on it and spin. You'll get the same results....FUCKED
 
So many on the left are simply despicable
Grampa thinks America was great when women couldn’t vote.
/——/ Dems think America was great when they held slaves.
Deplorables think America was great in the 1950’s when blacks knew their place and women were frowned on from leaving the kitchen.
/——-/ democRATs fought to block women’s right to vote and filibustered the CRA and VRA. Republicans got them passed. Do your homework before you post your tripe.
Moron forgetting it was LIBERALS for fought for women’s rights and civil rights while conservatives fought against it.
 
That's my guess. But talk radio makes no distinction, so I wonder if they're just not exposed to the difference. It's a terribly binary universe.
.
/——/ democRAT socialists don’t have to fund their national security. We do. They can afford the socialism.
Since I have no idea what your particular definition of "socialism" is, or to what you compare it, I have no idea what that means.
.
/——/ as outlined by the other poster Venezuela vs Europe
Great. What the Left wants is a Euro-social democracy.

So you don't have to worry about real socialism now.
.
/——/ Then let the left move there and leave us alone. Why the need to force their ideology on us who oppose it?
Well, the plan is to convince enough people to see things their way. A battle of ideologies, with the vote as the decider.

Since the term "socialism" is scaring fewer and fewer people nowadays, the Right had better come up with something better.
.
 
The Right completely continues to ignore the difference between actual socialism (Venezuela) and social democracy (Scandanavia, Canada, Europe, Australia).

The only question is, are they being intellectually dishonest, or do they really not know?
.

A little bit of cancer vs a whole lot of cancer. That is the difference, and results in the same bad outcome. Once a socialist program is instituted, it is virtually impossible to pull back without hurting a whole lot of people. And, there is a very broad menu of socialist programs available for the next step into the mire. The slippery slope into societal failure, or dictatorship.
We haven't seen Canada, Finland, Sweden, Germany, Britain, France or Australia descend into a dictatorship.

I understand the concept of a slippery slope, of course, but there just isn't a significant track record of this.
.
100% accurate but Cell blockhead thinks it’s funny.
/——/ Funny because you never saw Germany, Finland and France slip into a dictatorship...
 
8B147E20-DBBF-4D0F-B049-0C3AD7FC5D5F.jpeg
That's my guess. But talk radio makes no distinction, so I wonder if they're just not exposed to the difference. It's a terribly binary universe.
.
/——/ democRAT socialists don’t have to fund their national security. We do. They can afford the socialism.
Since I have no idea what your particular definition of "socialism" is, or to what you compare it, I have no idea what that means.
.
/——/ as outlined by the other poster Venezuela vs Europe
Great. What the Left wants is a Euro-social democracy.

So you don't have to worry about real socialism now.
.
The left should just buy a dildo, sit on it and spin. You'll get the same results....FUCKED
You better buy a lot of dildoes for November. Your ass is going to look like this.
 
/——/ democRAT socialists don’t have to fund their national security. We do. They can afford the socialism.
Since I have no idea what your particular definition of "socialism" is, or to what you compare it, I have no idea what that means.
.
/——/ as outlined by the other poster Venezuela vs Europe
Great. What the Left wants is a Euro-social democracy.

So you don't have to worry about real socialism now.
.
/——/ Then let the left move there and leave us alone. Why the need to force their ideology on us who oppose it?
Well, the plan is to convince enough people to see things their way. A battle of ideologies, with the vote as the decider.

Since the term "socialism" is scaring fewer and fewer people nowadays, the Right had better come up with something better.
.
/——/ Link.
 
The Right completely continues to ignore the difference between actual socialism (Venezuela) and social democracy (Scandanavia, Canada, Europe, Australia).

The only question is, are they being intellectually dishonest, or do they really not know?
.

A little bit of cancer vs a whole lot of cancer. That is the difference, and results in the same bad outcome. Once a socialist program is instituted, it is virtually impossible to pull back without hurting a whole lot of people. And, there is a very broad menu of socialist programs available for the next step into the mire. The slippery slope into societal failure, or dictatorship.
We haven't seen Canada, Finland, Sweden, Germany, Britain, France or Australia descend into a dictatorship.

I understand the concept of a slippery slope, of course, but there just isn't a significant track record of this.
.
100% accurate but Cell blockhead thinks it’s funny.
/——/ Funny because you never saw Germany, Finland and France slip into a dictatorship...
Why are you knocking dictatorships when your prez is obviously working hard to become one?
 
Since I have no idea what your particular definition of "socialism" is, or to what you compare it, I have no idea what that means.
.
/——/ as outlined by the other poster Venezuela vs Europe
Great. What the Left wants is a Euro-social democracy.

So you don't have to worry about real socialism now.
.
/——/ Then let the left move there and leave us alone. Why the need to force their ideology on us who oppose it?
Well, the plan is to convince enough people to see things their way. A battle of ideologies, with the vote as the decider.

Since the term "socialism" is scaring fewer and fewer people nowadays, the Right had better come up with something better.
.
/——/ Link.
Typical deplorable.
Someone states a fact.
He doesn’t know shit so he asks for a link.
Then he’ll call it fake news.
Wash and repeat.
 
So many on the left are simply despicable
Grampa thinks America was great when women couldn’t vote.
/——/ Dems think America was great when they held slaves.
Deplorables think America was great in the 1950’s when blacks knew their place and women were frowned on from leaving the kitchen.
/——-/ democRATs fought to block women’s right to vote and filibustered the CRA and VRA. Republicans got them passed. Do your homework before you post your tripe.
Moron forgetting it was LIBERALS for fought for women’s rights and civil rights while conservatives fought against it.
Cellblockhead doesn’t have the integrity to admit is was liberals who fought for civil and women’s rights while conservatives were dead set against it.
 
Define “Fair Capitalism”.
Socialism. That whole list of benefits I've been arguing. And taxing the rich and investing in America for a change...

You better look at the results of Socialism. The rich are not taxed; the high income earners are taxed and the Middle Class becomes none existent.
I don't know what socialism you are talking about, but outside doop world it is Scandinavia the EU Canada New Zealand Australia Japan where they have huge middle classes and not many poor. They still have plenty of rich people. Only brainwashed idiots allow a flat tax system like we have.

The countries you listed are some of the least socialist in the entire world.

Heritage Index of Economic Freedom.

Country Rank

New Zealand 3
Australia 5
Canada 9
Japan 30

Interestingly those countries also have socialist healthcare.
So do we.
 
Grampa thinks America was great when women couldn’t vote.
/——/ Dems think America was great when they held slaves.
Deplorables think America was great in the 1950’s when blacks knew their place and women were frowned on from leaving the kitchen.
/——-/ democRATs fought to block women’s right to vote and filibustered the CRA and VRA. Republicans got them passed. Do your homework before you post your tripe.
Moron forgetting it was LIBERALS for fought for women’s rights and civil rights while conservatives fought against it.
Cellblockhead doesn’t have the integrity to admit is was liberals who fought for civil and women’s rights while conservatives were dead set against it.
Who voted for the first and second civil rights act, moron?
 
Thank Bill DeBlasio for the new Democrat motto. Democrats claim they are patriots who love America, but every now and then they tell the truth. Republicans will enjoy rubbing Dim noses in DeBlasio's faux pas.

Audience Awkwardly Reacts When Cuomo Slams Trump’s MAGA Slogan, Says America ‘Was Never That Great’

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D.) slammed President Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" slogan on Wednesday, saying the country was "never that great" in the first place.

Speaking at an event for women and girls, Cuomo appeared to stun the crowd when he made the remark.

"We're not going to make America great again," Cuomo said. "It was never that great."

Some in the audience gasped and laughed in surprise.

We were all brainwashed as kids "How Great America Is" in grade school, fed the propaganda taught in school and like gullible children believed it. When we became we realized we were lied to and America actually really was never that great to begin with and very overrated. We were brainwashed into how great Capitalism is and taught how bad Socialism is, but no one gave us a chance as kids to hear the other side of the story... to hear about Capitalism from a Socialist who is against Capitalism. We were only provided one opinion and view to everything about America. We were lied to in grade school about how our really "Great America" got the land from the Indians... not being told about the reality of mass Genocide of American Indian's in this country. No no teachers couldn't tell that side of the story that would contradict with the "How Great America Is" story they were brainwashing their school children into thinking.

As an adult besides just hearing about Capitalism and Socialism and Communism from America's perspective I decided to be fair and lend my ear to other countries that did not agree with America to hear their side of their story and see if their arguments had any merit. I heard their anger toward America and their arguments why they didn't agree with America on some things and to be fair I think there were things they were right about and somethings they were still wrong about. Hearing from brilliant speakers all over the globe on youtube for example really opened my eyes and by listening to their side of the story I began to realize that America actually really was never that great to begin with :)


in which countries has socialism worked? in which countries has communism worked? Give us a list.
Pure socialism as an economic system doesn’t work since it provides nothing for individual incentive. On the other hand, many countries with a mix of capitalism and socialism work very well. They have a strong middle class, universal healthcare, good standard of living by a number of indicators. Is that bad?

They don't work very well. They just work better than pure socialism. Nothing works better than pure capitalism. That's shown by the fact that the closer a country gets to it, the faster it becomes wealthy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top