Utilitarian
co-Cain Manager
Fair enough, but I was basing it on the fact that a Nissan job is less likely to be outsourced than a Ford one. That's directly tied to unionization.Good post except the last one. I doubt it's better to be a Nissan or BMW employee than it is to be a Ford employeeBig Auto has been bailed out multiple times. This happened before the 90s.In 1997, 98, 99 Ford had record profits and the employees got record profit sharing. That was working together for the betterment of all. In the 2000's Republicans and Corporations waged war against unions. We found out around 2007 why. They were going to send all those jobs overseas in order to break those unions and renig on those pensions.What ever happened to working together for the betterment of all?
No matter what they say about unions remember in the 90's the Big 3 were making record profits. So what was the problem? The problem was labor was cutting too much into profits. Not good for the CEO and shareholders. And who did they sell this to? They sold it to Republicans who weren't in unions. Little did those suckers realize that if you attack unions then you attack the middle class and today no shit blue collar isn't as strong as it was in 1999. And today Republicans say they want to bring those jobs back home but only now they will be $15 hr jobs.
Retaining auto jobs in the US has a lot less to do with unions and a lot more to do with protectionist policies regarding car sales. For example, to avoid tariffs, we've had a policy in place for a while that requires a certain amount of assembly in the US. That has led to many foreign auto companies building plants here. Most of them are not unionized.
In fact, the threat of unionization usually gets these companies to improve pay and benefits in exchange for not unionizing. So, you could argue that the presence of unions may improve the lives of workers, but only in the context of it being a valid threat.
For the most unionized auto companies here, jobs do tend to end up overseas due to cheaper labor. The Big 3 have done this multiple times, largely because they're less affected by the tariffs we have in place.
At this point, it's better to be an employee of Nissan, Mercedes, or BMW than for Ford, GM, or Chrysler.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their Overall Rating 0.5 higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their Career Opportunities 0.4 higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.5 higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their Work-life balance 0.8 higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their Senior Management 0.5 higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their Culture & Values 0.7 higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their CEO Approval 16% higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
Here is a fact. Ford employees have job security. Workers at Nissan have ZERO. They are at will employers and can fire them for any reason.
Ford Motor Company employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 17% higher than Nissan employees rated theirs.
64%
Positive Business Outlook
53%
Ford Motor Company employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 10% higher thanNissan employees rated theirs.
Please don't make statements like you THINK it's better to be a NISSAN employee than a Ford employee. What did you base that on?