Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 62,011
- 55,622
- 3,600
To contain Communism. As we can see it did not work.Sorry you had friends die...but why did you go to a foreign land, invading it, killing its people?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To contain Communism. As we can see it did not work.Sorry you had friends die...but why did you go to a foreign land, invading it, killing its people?
The problem here is that one person's enemy might not be someone else's enemy.The problem here is that one person's enemy might not be someone else's enemy.
A lot of people felt the Vietnam should not be the US's enemy.
The Vietnamese were only killing US soldiers who were literally invading their country. They weren't killing US people in the US.
The Vietnamese were only killing US soldiers who were literally invading their country. They weren't killing US people in the US.
The problem here is that one person's enemy might not be someone else's enemy.
One person does not decide for the Nation who is friend and who is foe just like no single person has the right to decide when or against whom our Nation will wage war.
A lot of people felt the Vietnam should not be the US's enemy.
The fact is that "Vietnam" was never our enemy. Those who attacked and killed our soldiers as well as those of friends and allies became our enemies and rightly so. That was North Vietnam and other Communist sympathizers.
The Vietnamese were only killing US soldiers who were literally invading their country. They weren't killing US people in the US.
ONLY??!! US soldiers did NOT invade North Vietnam even though they gave us more than sufficient cause to do so.
Are you trying to claim that enemies should be allowed to kill US citizens as long as those citizens are also soldiers? Soldiers aren't important like you civilians are? How bigoted.
And if you think an American going to Vietnam and having their photo taken with "the enemy" is treason, then surely Americans at home killing US military personnel, killing 140,000 US military personnel, is also treason.
Obviously both would be true if the person in the later instance were American. I suspect you may have some "apples and oranges" example in mind.
Fonda also organized food and blood drives for the enemy as well as using her celebrity in aid of their propaganda.
She sat on a North anti aircraft gun saying "I wish I had one of those suckers in my sight right now". sucker being a US Airman A truly respected democRat that should rotted from the tree with John Kerry and Walter Cronkite long long ago Pelosi and her have two things in common, both low IQed democRats and both will be sporting a beard after their next face lift.
Bullshit. The only personal liberties you are willing to consider are your own and that of those who agree with your incredibly ignorant opinions. The stupidity of claiming North Vietnam was in any way in favor of personal liberty is simply mind boggling. North Vietnam was intent on invading and enslaving South Vietnam and that is exactly what they did with the aid of folks like you who are unwilling to tolerate personal liberty.
If you actually believed that idiocy how could you ever condone the North Vietnamese murder of so many innocent South Vietnamese? You-in your infinite wisdom- are the only correct definer of innocence? I don't think so.
Those were not illegal actions. The war was a righteous legal war started By minh who also seized power in a coup and then attacked another nation.
Quite wrong. Minh was a bloodthirsty dictator and most wanted help from his war of aggression. Fonda was in the wrong
Orders were illegal?
The problem here is that one person's enemy might not be someone else's enemy.
One person does not decide for the Nation who is friend and who is foe just like no single person has the right to decide when or against whom our Nation will wage war.
A lot of people felt the Vietnam should not be the US's enemy.
The fact is that "Vietnam" was never our enemy. Those who attacked and killed our soldiers as well as those of friends and allies became our enemies and rightly so. That was North Vietnam and other Communist sympathizers.
The Vietnamese were only killing US soldiers who were literally invading their country. They weren't killing US people in the US.
ONLY??!! US soldiers did NOT invade North Vietnam even though they gave us more than sufficient cause to do so.
Are you trying to claim that enemies should be allowed to kill US citizens as long as those citizens are also soldiers? Soldiers aren't important like you civilians are? How bigoted.
And if you think an American going to Vietnam and having their photo taken with "the enemy" is treason, then surely Americans at home killing US military personnel, killing 140,000 US military personnel, is also treason.
Obviously both would be true if the person in the later instance were American. I suspect you may have some "apples and oranges" example in mind.
Fonda also organized food and blood drives for the enemy as well as using her celebrity in aid of their propaganda.
To contain Communism. As we can see it did not work.
He ended up a Communist. Get it?Wrong.
Ho Chi Minh did not want help from China because he was not a communist and did not like the Chinese.
But we gave him no choice.
He spent years in the US, trying to get US support to get the French out of Vietnam.
We were the ones who turned him down.
China did not.
He ended up a Communist. Get it?
The US did not invade.The problem here is that one person's enemy might not be someone else's enemy.
A lot of people felt the Vietnam should not be the US's enemy.
The Vietnamese were only killing US soldiers who were literally invading their country. They weren't killing US people in the US.
And if you think an American going to Vietnam and having their photo taken with "the enemy" is treason, then surely Americans at home killing US military personnel, killing 140,000 US military personnel, is also treason.
Wrong.Wrong.
Ho Chi Minh was wildly popular, and he gained that by defeating the French and driving them out.
There were never suppose to be 2 countries, but instead an nation wide plebiscite in 1955, to decide who was to be the new ruler.
But Diem perpetrated an illegal military coup to prevent those elections, with the aid of the US.
The US illegally tried to create South Vietnam as a separate country, and that was against the Geneva peace accord between the Vietnamese and the French.
COmmunism is inherently evil it is strictly about authoritarian tyranny and slaveryIf your choice was between communism and French colonialism, you would pick communism as well.
There is nothing inherently evil about communism. For example, all families are communist.
The US did not invade.
The north vietnamese did
Outright lie and proven soThe US soldiers in Vietnam were there illegally and were illegally murdering 3 million Vietnamese.
All the US soldiers there were criminals by definition.
There was no legal way for them to be there, since Diem was illegal by taking over the South with a military coup.
Obviously the majority of the Vietnamese never wanted us there.
It is historic truthThat is totally untrue.
There were to be elections agreed upon by the Vietnamese, French, and everyone else.
The US then illegally prevented those elections because we knew Ho Chi Minh would win them if they were allowed.,
So no, the north did not invade, the south raised up in rebellion against the dictator Diem and the evil US imperialists.
Wrong.
There were historically two countries going back hundreds of years. Minh was not popular he actually siezed power in a coup and was never elected. Once extablished as ruler he slaughtered over 150,000 dissidents who were guilty of having an education or owning land.
It was not illegal at all. We are not the French and that accord did not apply.