Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But leave those subsidies for the wealthy and corporations alone! !
dear, please name just one or admit as a typical liberal you lack the IQ to be here
How corporate socialism destroys: David Cay Johnston
A proposal to spend $250 million of taxpayer money on a retail project here illustrates the damage state and local subsidies do by taking from the many to benefit the already rich few.
Nationwide state and local subsidies for corporations totaled more than $70 billion in 2010
RPT-COLUMN-How corporate socialism destroys David Cay Johnston Reuters
Ignored the 1920's and Ronnie huh? lol
But leave those subsidies for the wealthy and corporations alone! !
dear, please name just one or admit as a typical liberal you lack the IQ to be here
How corporate socialism destroys: David Cay Johnston
A proposal to spend $250 million of taxpayer money on a retail project here illustrates the damage state and local subsidies do by taking from the many to benefit the already rich few.
Nationwide state and local subsidies for corporations totaled more than $70 billion in 2010
RPT-COLUMN-How corporate socialism destroys David Cay Johnston Reuters
dear there is no damage if a state figures it is better off with the corp than without it. Is that really over your head?
Do you want a guy with a gun to prevent it in typical violent liberal fashion
Grove Norquist stating "I want to make government so small, I could drown it in a bathtub."
But leave those subsidies for the wealthy and corporations alone! !
dear, please name just one or admit as a typical liberal you lack the IQ to be here
How corporate socialism destroys: David Cay Johnston
A proposal to spend $250 million of taxpayer money on a retail project here illustrates the damage state and local subsidies do by taking from the many to benefit the already rich few.
Nationwide state and local subsidies for corporations totaled more than $70 billion in 2010
RPT-COLUMN-How corporate socialism destroys David Cay Johnston Reuters
dear there is no damage if a state figures it is better off with the corp than without it. Is that really over your head?
Do you want a guy with a gun to prevent it in typical violent liberal fashion
Ignored the 1920's and Ronnie huh? lol
what??????
the top 1% pay 40% of federal income taxes up from 20% under reagan and they pay 50% of state taxes. This represents redistribution from those who know how to invest money to those who know how to waste it. Bottom 45% pay no income tax
Grove Norquist stating "I want to make government so small, I could drown it in a bathtub."
dear freedom from govt was was our founders beleived in too. Can you tell us if you are a communist?
lol, It is NOW Dubya wasn't conservative nonsense huh? lol
The guys who CHOSE BIG federal Gov't Constitution over the small state rights guy?
The guys who CHOSE BIG federal Gov't Constitution over the small state rights guy?
too stupid it was not big but rather 1% the size of todays on percapita inflation adjusted basis. Are you a communist??
Yeah, carried forward losses, capital gains, dividends and muni bonds. So what?
Got it, you didn't REALLY mean this
" Either way, his single digit claim is BS"
He claimed he made millions and his "trust" allowed him to pay low single digits.
He lied. Get it?
Nope, AS I SHOWED, there were 6 families averaging over $200 million EACH who paid zero federal taxes. The top 400 only paid 19% on the $200+ million average. Get it? Your 39% is just BS
Lots of rich people lost a lot in 2008. Of course their 2009 taxes were lower.
So what?
Got it, you didn't REALLY mean this
" Either way, his single digit claim is BS"
But even the dems chose to tax workers for the ACA. Even Krugman doesn't see anything wrong with that, but he'd like the top rate back to 70 or 90%I think its more an effect of globalization. At one time, on a board with a union organizer who also had an economics degree, I thought perhaps the answer was electing people on the basis of their being willing to pass laws providing for taxes on the very very rich to pay for things .... like more support for education and healthcare.Growing income disparity is not only a problem here.
Report Income inequality rising in most developed countries - The Washington Post
They bought into "trickle down" thanks to the right wing think tanks they created in those nations like they started in the US in the 1970's!
But, it turns out that even the dems want workers to help pay for others care under the ACA and free tuition to community college with no requirement for gpa or even graduation.
IT'S GOV'T POLICY. Either bad or good, and conservatives/GOP have pushed it bad for 30+ years now
Grove Norquist stating "I want to make government so small, I could drown it in a bathtub."
Republicans have hordes of people more than willing to vote against their own best interest in the deluded belief that if they support the 1%ers they will magically become one of them some day in the not so distant future!!
Yeah, carried forward losses, capital gains, dividends and muni bonds. So what?
Got it, you didn't REALLY mean this
" Either way, his single digit claim is BS"
He claimed he made millions and his "trust" allowed him to pay low single digits.
He lied. Get it?
Nope, AS I SHOWED, there were 6 families averaging over $200 million EACH who paid zero federal taxes. The top 400 only paid 19% on the $200+ million average. Get it? Your 39% is just BS
Lots of rich people lost a lot in 2008. Of course their 2009 taxes were lower.
So what?
BTW, they averaged over $200+ million PER family in 2009, lol
If the top earners made ALL the money, they would pay ALL the taxes. OMG.
He claimed he made millions and his "trust" allowed him to pay low single digits.
He lied. Get it?
Nope, AS I SHOWED, there were 6 families averaging over $200 million EACH who paid zero federal taxes. The top 400 only paid 19% on the $200+ million average. Get it? Your 39% is just BS
the top 1% pay 40% of federal income taxes up from 20% under reagan and they pay 50% of state taxes. This represents redistribution from those who know how to invest money to those who know how to waste it. Bottom 45% pay no income tax
You mean as their tax rates collapsed, their incomes skyrocketed and their effective tax rates on those incomes also plummeted AS the share of fed revenues coming from individual income taxes hit near post WW2 share of fed revenues??
the top 1% pay 40% of federal income taxes bottom 45% pay nothing
Top 1% who TAKE over 20% of ALL US income versus the bottom HALF of US with 11% of the entire pie BUT pay other forms of federals taxes? Horrible
But even the dems chose to tax workers for the ACA. Even Krugman doesn't see anything wrong with that, but he'd like the top rate back to 70 or 90%I think its more an effect of globalization. At one time, on a board with a union organizer who also had an economics degree, I thought perhaps the answer was electing people on the basis of their being willing to pass laws providing for taxes on the very very rich to pay for things .... like more support for education and healthcare.Growing income disparity is not only a problem here.
Report Income inequality rising in most developed countries - The Washington Post
They bought into "trickle down" thanks to the right wing think tanks they created in those nations like they started in the US in the 1970's!
But, it turns out that even the dems want workers to help pay for others care under the ACA and free tuition to community college with no requirement for gpa or even graduation.
IT'S GOV'T POLICY. Either bad or good, and conservatives/GOP have pushed it bad for 30+ years now
Grove Norquist stating "I want to make government so small, I could drown it in a bathtub."
Republicans have hordes of people more than willing to vote against their own best interest in the deluded belief that if they support the 1%ers they will magically become one of them some day in the not so distant future!!
And people running multi-nationals don't get some kinky joy out of cutting benefits.
The guys who CHOSE BIG federal Gov't Constitution over the small state rights guy?
too stupid it was not big but rather 1% the size of todays on percapita inflation adjusted basis. Are you a communist??
Lol, Moron
If the top earners made ALL the money, they would pay ALL the taxes. OMG.
so I gather you would like it if the bottom 99% earned more. Here's how:
1) make liberal unions illegal again and bring back 20 million jobs
2) make liberal corporate taxes illegal and bring back 10 million jobs
3) make deficits illegal and bring back 5 million jobs
4) ship 20 million illegals home and create 20 million jobs
5) end the liberal war on families and schools and create 30 million folks capable of working
Got it, you didn't REALLY mean this
" Either way, his single digit claim is BS"
He claimed he made millions and his "trust" allowed him to pay low single digits.
He lied. Get it?
Nope, AS I SHOWED, there were 6 families averaging over $200 million EACH who paid zero federal taxes. The top 400 only paid 19% on the $200+ million average. Get it? Your 39% is just BS
Lots of rich people lost a lot in 2008. Of course their 2009 taxes were lower.
So what?
Got it, you didn't REALLY mean this
" Either way, his single digit claim is BS"
Yes, he lied.
