Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The witness from the OP said he has his hands up then put them down.ut these other people were not lying about the part of MB putting his hands up
Once again, none of the witness said he had his hands up. Not one.
How does something second handed (NEWSPAPER SOURCE) change what was shown from the grand jury released documents from the OP?Try this. It's a pretty comprehensive look at the GJ testimony related to Brown's movements just before he was fatally shot.
Eyewitness statements Did Michael Brown charge
How does something second handed (NEWSPAPER SOURCE) change what was shown from the grand jury released documents from the OP?Try this. It's a pretty comprehensive look at the GJ testimony related to Brown's movements just before he was fatally shot.
Eyewitness statements Did Michael Brown charge
Cherry picked? was what he posted said during the grand jury at any time?How does something second handed (NEWSPAPER SOURCE) change what was shown from the grand jury released documents from the OP?Try this. It's a pretty comprehensive look at the GJ testimony related to Brown's movements just before he was fatally shot.
Eyewitness statements Did Michael Brown charge
The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP. Did you not know this? The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
It doesn't change anything....it paints a more accurate picture. Get it?
Cherry picked? was what he posted said during the grand jury at any time?How does something second handed (NEWSPAPER SOURCE) change what was shown from the grand jury released documents from the OP?Try this. It's a pretty comprehensive look at the GJ testimony related to Brown's movements just before he was fatally shot.
Eyewitness statements Did Michael Brown charge
The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP. Did you not know this? The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
It doesn't change anything....it paints a more accurate picture. Get it?
The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP
The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected.
I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
So you're saying that your source a newspaper link has more validity and not cherry picked than the link with the Grand Jury document?Cherry picked? was what he posted said during the grand jury at any time?How does something second handed (NEWSPAPER SOURCE) change what was shown from the grand jury released documents from the OP?Try this. It's a pretty comprehensive look at the GJ testimony related to Brown's movements just before he was fatally shot.
Eyewitness statements Did Michael Brown charge
The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP. Did you not know this? The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
It doesn't change anything....it paints a more accurate picture. Get it?
Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
I know you have a hard time with communication. All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected. I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
Fuck off, stupid. You are arguing with yourself. Your desire to be argumentative defines you.
The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP
And? Is this the only argument you have?
The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
You are free to do your own research wiseass.
Brown strong armed robbery thug accomplices stated he did have his hands up and was surrendering.The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP
And? Is this the only argument you have?
The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
You are free to do your own research wiseass.
You did research? Cool! I thought you just copied some stuff that you think agrees with you. My mistake.
Now...how many witnesses said that Brown had his hands up?
Now...how many witnesses said that Brown had his hands up?
Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
Even if I could, I couldn't. You would be scrolling for 20 minutes. Besides, I can't expect you to read past the first page on the first volume. There are 24 of them.
All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected.
Where do you think I got mine from? CNN of all places.
I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
Your actions belie your intent. Given how far left you are, it's only natural to assume that you disagreed with the decision and therefore felt compelled to ask me to quote ALL of the testimony. You rally behind Brown when you should be objective. Unless you're Statistikhengst, who thinks Brown was 148 feet away from Wilson when he was killed. Yeah, right.
So you're saying that your source a newspaper link has more validity and not cherry picked than the link with the Grand Jury document?Cherry picked? was what he posted said during the grand jury at any time?How does something second handed (NEWSPAPER SOURCE) change what was shown from the grand jury released documents from the OP?Try this. It's a pretty comprehensive look at the GJ testimony related to Brown's movements just before he was fatally shot.
Eyewitness statements Did Michael Brown charge
The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP. Did you not know this? The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
It doesn't change anything....it paints a more accurate picture. Get it?
Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
I know you have a hard time with communication. All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected. I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
Fuck off, stupid. You are arguing with yourself. Your desire to be argumentative defines you.
OH brother and you have the audacity to call me stupid?
But was it cherry picked and could it be used in a court of law? Don't think second hand sources hold much water in a court of law.Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
Even if I could, I couldn't. You would be scrolling for 20 minutes. Besides, I can't expect you to read past the first page on the first volume. There are 24 of them.
All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected.
Where do you think I got mine from? CNN of all places.
I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
Your actions belie your intent. Given how far left you are, it's only natural to assume that you disagreed with the decision and therefore felt compelled to ask me to quote ALL of the testimony. You rally behind Brown when you should be objective. Unless you're Statistikhengst, who thinks Brown was 148 feet away from Wilson when he was killed. Yeah, right.
My actions belie my intent? You are a retard.
I am simply providing the information that you left out.
I'm still undecided, by the way.
It's a second hand source.So you're saying that your source a newspaper link has more validity and not cherry picked than the link with the Grand Jury document?Cherry picked? was what he posted said during the grand jury at any time?How does something second handed (NEWSPAPER SOURCE) change what was shown from the grand jury released documents from the OP?
The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP. Did you not know this? The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
It doesn't change anything....it paints a more accurate picture. Get it?
Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
I know you have a hard time with communication. All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected. I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
Fuck off, stupid. You are arguing with yourself. Your desire to be argumentative defines you.
OH brother and you have the audacity to call me stupid?
My "source" is a compilation of direct GJ testimony. Idiot.
Now...how many witnesses said that Brown had his hands up?
You have the info, look it up genius. A lot of them were lying about him having his hands up and running away when he was killed. Can you find evidence that this is what actually happened?
But was it cherry picked and could it be used in a court of law? Don't think second hand sources hold much water in a court of law.Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
Even if I could, I couldn't. You would be scrolling for 20 minutes. Besides, I can't expect you to read past the first page on the first volume. There are 24 of them.
All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected.
Where do you think I got mine from? CNN of all places.
I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
Your actions belie your intent. Given how far left you are, it's only natural to assume that you disagreed with the decision and therefore felt compelled to ask me to quote ALL of the testimony. You rally behind Brown when you should be objective. Unless you're Statistikhengst, who thinks Brown was 148 feet away from Wilson when he was killed. Yeah, right.
My actions belie my intent? You are a retard.
I am simply providing the information that you left out.
I'm still undecided, by the way.
No, idiot. You look at the forensic evidence and see if that confirms or refutes testimony. Which is what the GJ did. And guess what?Now...how many witnesses said that Brown had his hands up?
You have the info, look it up genius. A lot of them were lying about him having his hands up and running away when he was killed. Can you find evidence that this is what actually happened?
A lot of them were lying? How many said that he was running away when he was killed? Where is that testimony?
The problem that you have is that you are choosing to believe one or two witnesses while choosing to disregard others. Without a trial and sufficient cross examination of all witnesses, we won't know who was lying and who wasn't.
I've not come to a decision yet. I want to know more. It's a liberal thing.
It's a second hand source.So you're saying that your source a newspaper link has more validity and not cherry picked than the link with the Grand Jury document?Cherry picked? was what he posted said during the grand jury at any time?The OP cherry picked the testimony. It was a cut and paste job by the. OP. Did you not know this? The WP is comprehensive and is interactive. It gives us all of the testimony related to Brown's movements at the time he was shot to death.
It doesn't change anything....it paints a more accurate picture. Get it?
Yes. Did he post the testimony of all the witnesses or just three?
I know you have a hard time with communication. All I did was link to a source where all the witness' comments regarding Brown's movements are collected. I didn't offer an opinion about which was accurate and which wasn't. I simply provided the info.
Fuck off, stupid. You are arguing with yourself. Your desire to be argumentative defines you.
OH brother and you have the audacity to call me stupid?
My "source" is a compilation of direct GJ testimony. Idiot.
