An outrage

[Uncensored2008]

No, they could not have.

So, you're saying the corrupt Obama administration is incapable of providing a factual account of anything?

Could be true.

And what makes it an act of terror?

Islamic Jihad attacking the U.S. Army.

You fucking retards are something else.

Was Sandy Hook an act of terror?

Dunno, was Adam Lanza a member of Al Qaeda, the way Maj. Hasan is?

Or any other mass shooting? As far as I know, there is nothing that links him to any group or conspiracy.

ROFL

Right, you're just stupid - not lying..

{WASHINGTON — Intelligence agencies intercepted communications last year and this year between the military psychiatrist accused of shooting to death 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., and a radical cleric in Yemen known for his incendiary anti-American teachings.}

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/us/10inquire.html?_r=0

Nor did he plant a bomb, which is generally considered an act of terror. Nor was his target political.

ROFL

The bullshit you fools spout.

His motive appears that he didn't want to deploy to Afghanistan and cracked. Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act.

He's fucking Al Qaeda, shit fer brains.

 

[Connery]

And what does this administration have to do with military salaries

By claiming this is "workplace violence" rather than Islamic terrorism - the most corrupt DOJ in history allows Hasan to continue to collect his salary.

OBVIOUSLY it was a terrorist attack, but the Obama administration has continually lied - allowing this travesty.

Can you provide those parameters and laws which would allow the DOJ to declare this military man's conduct an act of terrorism.

 

[Connery]

i just wish we treated our seniors and the pay we owe thme through SS as well as we treat our terrorists

The UCMJ should include a provision where the killer's salary could be held in escrow pending outcome of the case.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Can you provide those parameters and laws which would allow the DOJ to declare this military man's conduct an act of terrorism.

Since it is established fact that Nidal Hasan is a member of Al Qaeda - as shown by his email train with al-Awlaki - he is subject to "extraordinary rendition." Ship his ass to Gitmo.

 

[Connery]

Can you provide those parameters and laws which would allow the DOJ to declare this military man's conduct an act of terrorism.

Since it is established fact that Nidal Hasan is a member of Al Qaeda - as shown by his email train with al-Awlaki - he is subject to "extraordinary rendition." Ship his ass to Gitmo.

That did not answer my question.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Uncensored response: Homina homina

 

[Socio]

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

No problem as long as when he is convicted as part of the sentencing he is fined in the amount of every penny he has been getting paid.

 

[PratchettFan]

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.
Not only that but some of the people who were victims have had their benefits canceled.

He is member of the military being tried under the military code of justice - has nothing to do with what the administration "chooses".

That is not true. The President is commander and chief and head of the military. Also the administration selects the secretary of defense and who follows administration policy. They refused to call this what it was, a terror attack and instead called it a work place incident.
Had they called it what it was and prosecuted under enemy combatant he would have lost his pay, but the secretary and the president have refused to do that.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Obviously, that won't stop you.

 

[saved]

He is member of the military being tried under the military code of justice - has nothing to do with what the administration "chooses".

That is not true. The President is commander and chief and head of the military. Also the administration selects the secretary of defense and who follows administration policy. They refused to call this what it was, a terror attack and instead called it a work place incident.
Had they called it what it was and prosecuted under enemy combatant he would have lost his pay, but the secretary and the president have refused to do that.

The President has no say in the matter.

The UCMJ is controlling in this case and "Hasan still is receiving payment from the U.S. military because, according to a spokesman, he is still a service member .

"He is a major in the United States Army and will therefore be paid until he is no longer a major," said Lt. Col. Chris Garver. "So yes, he's still receiving payment."

According to Army records, Hasan stands to receive a check for about $6,000 every month. He is also eligible for what the Army calls an "incentive pay" that could be as much as $15,000 annually. Galligan declined to comment on how much Hasan is worth."

Fort Hood Suspect Nidal Hasan Can't Find a Bank Willing to Cash His Checks (Older article but is serves the purpose of the post)

Yes the President is responsible. He is the commander and chief of the military and his secretary of defense is appointed by him. Both have refused to allow this to be called an act of terror so the case could be tried as an enemy combatant which would have stopped the pay for this man.

 

[saved]

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

No problem as long as when he is convicted as part of the sentencing he is fined in the amount of every penny he has been getting paid.

First that will never happen and second he could be funneling the money to other terrorists.

 

[g5000]

It's not like he's out on the town spending it on hookers and blow, folks.

 

[hortysir]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.
Not only that but some of the people who were victims have had their benefits canceled.

Then how would lawyers get paid?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Thanks to this current administration
Report: Fort Hood shooter has drawn $278G in salary since massacre | Fox News

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

And what does this administration have to do with military salaries

Follow this closely: by refusing to call this attack exactly what it was....they have rewarded the shooter and deprived the victims of their due.

"The lawsuit alleging negligence by the government said that the Defense Department is avoiding legal and financial responsibility for the killings by referring to the shootings as "workplace violence" rather than as a terrorist attack.

The lawsuit attributed the government's alleged inaction to elevating "political correctness" over national security.

In a conference call with reporters, former Staff Sgt. Shawn N. Manning, who was shot six times by Hasan, said that the terrorism designation which the victims are seeking would cover the cost of the medical services that he requires. The terrorism designation would mean that the wounds the victims suffered qualify as combat-related, resulting in "a huge difference in benefits," said Manning, who was medically discharged from the military about a month ago."
Fort Hood shooting victims sue government - CBS News



Do you understand now???

 

[PoliticalChic]

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.
Not only that but some of the people who were victims have had their benefits canceled.

He is member of the military being tried under the military code of justice - has nothing to do with what the administration "chooses".

Absolutely incorrect.

 

[PoliticalChic]

He hasn't been convicted of anything yet, and is therefore still legally entitled to his salary. It's the legal presumption of innocence. Where's the problem?

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.

No, they could not have. And what makes it an act of terror? Was Sandy Hook an act of terror? Or any other mass shooting? As far as I know, there is nothing that links him to any group or conspiracy. Nor did he plant a bomb, which is generally considered an act of terror. Nor was his target political. His motive appears that he didn't want to deploy to Afghanistan and cracked. Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act.

"Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act."

Are you nuts???


How do you find your way back to that refrigerator box you call home each day???

 

[PoliticalChic]

And what does this administration have to do with military salaries

By claiming this is "workplace violence" rather than Islamic terrorism - the most corrupt DOJ in history allows Hasan to continue to collect his salary.

OBVIOUSLY it was a terrorist attack, but the Obama administration has continually lied - allowing this travesty.

You seem to be one of the few who actually understands what is going on.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And what does this administration have to do with military salaries

By claiming this is "workplace violence" rather than Islamic terrorism - the most corrupt DOJ in history allows Hasan to continue to collect his salary.

OBVIOUSLY it was a terrorist attack, but the Obama administration has continually lied - allowing this travesty.

Can you provide those parameters and laws which would allow the DOJ to declare this military man's conduct an act of terrorism.

I'm thinkin' that screaming alluaha akbar, and the fact that his business card said 'Soldier of Allah' might be a clue to folks with their head screwed on right....

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, they could not have. And what makes it an act of terror? Was Sandy Hook an act of terror? Or any other mass shooting? As far as I know, there is nothing that links him to any group or conspiracy. Nor did he plant a bomb, which is generally considered an act of terror. Nor was his target political. His motive appears that he didn't want to deploy to Afghanistan and cracked. Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act.

Walk onto a military base and shout the jihad battle cry then shoot people like this man did and see if it is called an act of terror.
Soldiers hear jihad battle cry before Hood shooting | Military City | a mySA.com blog

Pretty much any act of mass violence is an act of terror by that definition.

Check this out:

"According to a statement from Metropolitan Police Commander Simon Letchford, police were called to an incident in John Wilson Street at 2:20 p.m. this afternoon. Eyewitness accounts, including from some who took to Twitter to report the incident, suggest that two attackers drove into the man and then get out of the car to hack him with a machete. The two men then allegedly dragged his body into the middle of John Wilson Street before asking bystanders to photograph and film them.

Speculation that it is a terrorist incident has been spurred by rumors, which the BBC’s political editor Nick Robinson says has been repeated by senior Whitehall sources, that the attackers were heard to say “Allhau Akbar [God is Great].”
London Man Hacked to Death in Woolwich 'Terror' Attack | TIME.com



Terrorist attack?

Take a guess....

 

[Connery]

By claiming this is "workplace violence" rather than Islamic terrorism - the most corrupt DOJ in history allows Hasan to continue to collect his salary.

OBVIOUSLY it was a terrorist attack, but the Obama administration has continually lied - allowing this travesty.

Can you provide those parameters and laws which would allow the DOJ to declare this military man's conduct an act of terrorism.

I'm thinkin' that screaming alluaha akbar, and the fact that his business card said 'Soldier of Allah' might be a clue to folks with their head screwed on right....

This could be entered at trial. I have no doubt that this guy is a terrorist or a nut job. The question I need answered is which or both.

 

[Coyote]

The current administration refuses to call this an act of terror. Instead they are calling this a work place incident. If they had called this an act of terror and prosecuted him as an enemy combatant they could have stopped his pay.

No, they could not have. And what makes it an act of terror? Was Sandy Hook an act of terror? Or any other mass shooting? As far as I know, there is nothing that links him to any group or conspiracy. Nor did he plant a bomb, which is generally considered an act of terror. Nor was his target political. His motive appears that he didn't want to deploy to Afghanistan and cracked. Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act.

"Shouting Allahu Akbar doesn't make it a terrorist act."

Are you nuts???


How do you find your way back to that refrigerator box you call home each day???

Shouting Allahu Akbar in and of itself does not make anything a terrorist act. Look up the definition of terrorism.