Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well sally you need to learn about the senate then and how many votes are required to make the taxes permanent. Again, making my case, the leftists don't want middle america to reap benefits. amazing.Yet the tax cuts for the lower classes are temporary, while the tax cuts for the upper classes are permanent. Hmmm I wonder why.See, the middle class did receive that lower tax rate, we are seeing more in our paychecks and we are spending more. The corporations are now hiring more at higher wages. which was the point of the exercise.
And bullshit on corporations hiring more because of the recent tax cuts. They’re putting more on their own pockets and throwing a few one-time peanuts to their employees
Why should corporations pay taxes, you ask? Are you serious?why should a corporation pay taxes, explain that first.Where did I say I want all of their money, dipshit?then why do you want all their money so they don't have any to pay their employees? dude the only logical direction is bankruptcy or shutdown. so, yeah you do
And speaking of bankruptcy, Agent Orange loves it.
second, trump utilized the bankruptcy system because of what i already told you would happen with high corporate taxes. You again prove my point.
When you give the lower classes tax cuts, that puts more money in their pockets. You know what the poor and middle class do when they have more money? They spend it on goods and services, which increases demand and yes, creates jobs. You know what the already-rich do when you give them tax cuts and put more money in their bank accounts? It stays there, because they’re already well-off and can get by on what they already have. It’s not rocket science. You’re just a dumb, wannabe who drinks the trickle down piss with glee.dude, that fk wants them to go out of business and leave no middle class working.TRUMP’S TAX CUTS DIDN’T BENEFIT U.S. WORKERS, MADE RICH COMPANIES RICHER, ANALYSIS FINDS
Trump and Republican leadership have long touted their tax cuts as a massive boon to America’s working class, if not through direct tax reductions or refunds, then through the trickle-down effect of bonuses and wage increases from their employers who receive massive corporate cuts. “Tax reform is working,” Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan said in January, mentioning Apple’s decision to reward a bonus of $2,500 in stock grants to some Apple employees. “Workers are coming home and telling their families they got a bonus, or they got a raise or they got better benefits.”
But a new analysis of all Fortune 500 companies found only 4.3 percent of workers will receive a one-time bonus or wage increase tied to the business tax cuts, while businesses received nine times more in cuts than what they passed on to their workers, according to Americans for Tax Fairness, a political advocacy group devoted to tax reform. The analysis also found that companies spent 37 times as much on stock buybacks than they did on bonuses and increased wages for workers.
“There are too many disingenuous claims that the Trump and Republican tax cuts for corporations will trickle down to the middle class,” said Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness. “President Trump and Republicans gave huge tax cuts to big drug companies, big oil and other corporations, but corporations are giving back little—if anything—to working families,” said Clemente. “In fact, this [analysis shows] that 433 corporations out of the Fortune 500 have announced no plans to share their tax cuts with employees.”
The newest projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Republican tax plan led to, in part, a 2018 deficit $242 billion higher than previously estimated.
Roughly 36 percent of Americans approve of the Republican tax cuts, according to a March Quinnipiac University Poll and a CNBC poll found that 52 percent of working adults said they had not seen a change to their paychecks since the cuts were passed.
In January, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said 90 percent of all working adults would see increases in their paychecks because of the cuts.
Hmmm, let’s go with your bullshit findings....I’m curious, is there something wrong with companies keeping more of what they generate?
Yep...that whack will also tell you that poor people create jobs.
Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?Those companies are not going to hire anyone unless there is an increased demand for their product or service. That only happens when working/ middle class people have more disposable income. Trickle down / supply-side economics has been discredited. Only fools and liars push it.see that's where we differ, I am for the rich company providing a paying job helping those in need and feeling good about their life being productive, and earning a living. you wish to keep them dependent on you. aren't you sweet.In their world, if you don’t agree with them, you’re a “welfare queen”.but I can bet those bitching in this post about not having stocks, are actually those who don't have stock
Another 4th grade "retort"........No wonder trump honestly stated that he loves the poorly educated who voted for his sorry, fat ass.
I’m a honest, hardworking American tax payer who has never been on welfare; but I support helping those in need over giving more money to already rich companies.
These bootlickers just continue licking even as their Dear Leader walks right over them
well it's simple, you're a leftist and you believe presidential elections are popular vote contests. It's all over this fking message board.Where did I say the electoral college doesn’t elect presidents? You keep putting words in my mouth without backing them up. You’re a fucking lying piece of shitno they don't nor do you. you don't understand the electoral college elects our presidents. you and your comrads believe it is the popular vote. hahahaahahaWell, we already know how smart you are. I’m sure if I explained to an immigrant the primary election process, they’d understand it; but you had it explained to you by multiple people multiple times, and you still don’t get it. You’re a god damn retardit's what rabbits think I get it.They’re definitely more intelligent than youand third world aliens are much smarter than all of white america.can't make it up. you shot your own post down with your own words.
I asked the question and you don't have an answer. ain't that grand.Why should corporations pay taxes, you ask? Are you serious?why should a corporation pay taxes, explain that first.Where did I say I want all of their money, dipshit?then why do you want all their money so they don't have any to pay their employees? dude the only logical direction is bankruptcy or shutdown. so, yeah you do
And speaking of bankruptcy, Agent Orange loves it.
second, trump utilized the bankruptcy system because of what i already told you would happen with high corporate taxes. You again prove my point.
shhh he wants the corporations to fold. he isn't a believer in the american working class.When you give the lower classes tax cuts, that puts more money in their pockets. You know what the poor and middle class do when they have more money? They spend it on goods and services, which increases demand and yes, creates jobs. You know what the already-rich do when you give them tax cuts and put more money in their bank accounts? It stays there, because they’re already well-off and can get by on what they already have. It’s not rocket science. You’re just a dumb, wannabe who drinks the trickle down piss with glee.dude, that fk wants them to go out of business and leave no middle class working.TRUMP’S TAX CUTS DIDN’T BENEFIT U.S. WORKERS, MADE RICH COMPANIES RICHER, ANALYSIS FINDS
Trump and Republican leadership have long touted their tax cuts as a massive boon to America’s working class, if not through direct tax reductions or refunds, then through the trickle-down effect of bonuses and wage increases from their employers who receive massive corporate cuts. “Tax reform is working,” Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan said in January, mentioning Apple’s decision to reward a bonus of $2,500 in stock grants to some Apple employees. “Workers are coming home and telling their families they got a bonus, or they got a raise or they got better benefits.”
But a new analysis of all Fortune 500 companies found only 4.3 percent of workers will receive a one-time bonus or wage increase tied to the business tax cuts, while businesses received nine times more in cuts than what they passed on to their workers, according to Americans for Tax Fairness, a political advocacy group devoted to tax reform. The analysis also found that companies spent 37 times as much on stock buybacks than they did on bonuses and increased wages for workers.
“There are too many disingenuous claims that the Trump and Republican tax cuts for corporations will trickle down to the middle class,” said Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness. “President Trump and Republicans gave huge tax cuts to big drug companies, big oil and other corporations, but corporations are giving back little—if anything—to working families,” said Clemente. “In fact, this [analysis shows] that 433 corporations out of the Fortune 500 have announced no plans to share their tax cuts with employees.”
The newest projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Republican tax plan led to, in part, a 2018 deficit $242 billion higher than previously estimated.
Roughly 36 percent of Americans approve of the Republican tax cuts, according to a March Quinnipiac University Poll and a CNBC poll found that 52 percent of working adults said they had not seen a change to their paychecks since the cuts were passed.
In January, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said 90 percent of all working adults would see increases in their paychecks because of the cuts.
Hmmm, let’s go with your bullshit findings....I’m curious, is there something wrong with companies keeping more of what they generate?
Yep...that whack will also tell you that poor people create jobs.
Left wing economics loves consumer spending. You are correct that consumer spending increases demand, and therefore creates jobs. However, if the products demanded are manufactured overseas, then that is where the jobs are created.
give away what?Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?Those companies are not going to hire anyone unless there is an increased demand for their product or service. That only happens when working/ middle class people have more disposable income. Trickle down / supply-side economics has been discredited. Only fools and liars push it.see that's where we differ, I am for the rich company providing a paying job helping those in need and feeling good about their life being productive, and earning a living. you wish to keep them dependent on you. aren't you sweet.In their world, if you don’t agree with them, you’re a “welfare queen”.Another 4th grade "retort"........No wonder trump honestly stated that he loves the poorly educated who voted for his sorry, fat ass.
I’m a honest, hardworking American tax payer who has never been on welfare; but I support helping those in need over giving more money to already rich companies.
These bootlickers just continue licking even as their Dear Leader walks right over them
Just love how you think having people KEEP more of their money is a give away... A give away is when a government takes from the earners and Dhaaa Gives it away to those people who sit on the liberal lazy asses bitching how fucked up their lives are.Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?Those companies are not going to hire anyone unless there is an increased demand for their product or service. That only happens when working/ middle class people have more disposable income. Trickle down / supply-side economics has been discredited. Only fools and liars push it.see that's where we differ, I am for the rich company providing a paying job helping those in need and feeling good about their life being productive, and earning a living. you wish to keep them dependent on you. aren't you sweet.In their world, if you don’t agree with them, you’re a “welfare queen”.Another 4th grade "retort"........No wonder trump honestly stated that he loves the poorly educated who voted for his sorry, fat ass.
I’m a honest, hardworking American tax payer who has never been on welfare; but I support helping those in need over giving more money to already rich companies.
These bootlickers just continue licking even as their Dear Leader walks right over them
give away what?Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?Those companies are not going to hire anyone unless there is an increased demand for their product or service. That only happens when working/ middle class people have more disposable income. Trickle down / supply-side economics has been discredited. Only fools and liars push it.see that's where we differ, I am for the rich company providing a paying job helping those in need and feeling good about their life being productive, and earning a living. you wish to keep them dependent on you. aren't you sweet.In their world, if you don’t agree with them, you’re a “welfare queen”.
I’m a honest, hardworking American tax payer who has never been on welfare; but I support helping those in need over giving more money to already rich companies.
These bootlickers just continue licking even as their Dear Leader walks right over them
no,no, I am on that particular statement. Who gives away to the wealthy? I'm sorry, but really, I have no fking idea. I see you don't either cause you didn't want to answer the question. you deflected to me being clueless about it, which I am. please it's obvious you know more than me on the topic so I'm looking to learn. teach me.give away what?Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?Those companies are not going to hire anyone unless there is an increased demand for their product or service. That only happens when working/ middle class people have more disposable income. Trickle down / supply-side economics has been discredited. Only fools and liars push it.see that's where we differ, I am for the rich company providing a paying job helping those in need and feeling good about their life being productive, and earning a living. you wish to keep them dependent on you. aren't you sweet.
Thank for admitting that you are clueless
Bovine Excrement. I'm not playing your dumb ass gameno,no, I am on that particular statement. Who gives away to the wealthy? I'm sorry, but really, I have no fking idea. I see you don't either cause you didn't want to answer the question. you deflected to me being clueless about it, which I am. please it's obvious you know more than me on the topic so I'm looking to learn. teach me.give away what?Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?Those companies are not going to hire anyone unless there is an increased demand for their product or service. That only happens when working/ middle class people have more disposable income. Trickle down / supply-side economics has been discredited. Only fools and liars push it.
Thank for admitting that you are clueless
well then it's obvious you just made up that statement and can't back it up. how leftist of you. So you don't know what a give away is and by whom? got it. so your post is false. thanks.Bovine Excrement. I'm not playing your dumb ass gameno,no, I am on that particular statement. Who gives away to the wealthy? I'm sorry, but really, I have no fking idea. I see you don't either cause you didn't want to answer the question. you deflected to me being clueless about it, which I am. please it's obvious you know more than me on the topic so I'm looking to learn. teach me.give away what?Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?
Thank for admitting that you are clueless
dude, he has no fking idea what he meant with that statement. I asked him to define it for me and he can't. so he made it up. so he is just saying that he doesn't like corporations, buildings!Just love how you think having people KEEP more of their money is a give away... A give away is when a government takes from the earners and Dhaaa Gives it away to those people who sit on the liberal lazy asses bitching how fucked up their lives are.Dhaaaaaa Give aways to the wealthy that will ostensibly "trickle down" to others. You really didn't know that?explain trickle down in your definition?Those companies are not going to hire anyone unless there is an increased demand for their product or service. That only happens when working/ middle class people have more disposable income. Trickle down / supply-side economics has been discredited. Only fools and liars push it.see that's where we differ, I am for the rich company providing a paying job helping those in need and feeling good about their life being productive, and earning a living. you wish to keep them dependent on you. aren't you sweet.In their world, if you don’t agree with them, you’re a “welfare queen”.
I’m a honest, hardworking American tax payer who has never been on welfare; but I support helping those in need over giving more money to already rich companies.
These bootlickers just continue licking even as their Dear Leader walks right over them
That is even more bizarre than most of your posts. I'm not the one saying that they are unconstitutional, Sparky.And a turnip knows more than you do about the constitutionAnother person who has delusions of being a constitutional scholar .Or we can benefit all;
Your faulty math doesn't benefit all.
Most of your "ideas" are unconstitutional.
I agree, onepercenter knows less amore bout the Constitution than you do......
Maybe you could show your knowledge by explaining which of onepercenter's "ideas"
are unconstitutional?
When you give the lower classes tax cuts, that puts more money in their pockets. You know what the poor and middle class do when they have more money? They spend it on goods and services, which increases demand and yes, creates jobs. You know what the already-rich do when you give them tax cuts and put more money in their bank accounts? It stays there, because they’re already well-off and can get by on what they already have. It’s not rocket science. You’re just a dumb, wannabe who drinks the trickle down piss with glee.dude, that fk wants them to go out of business and leave no middle class working.TRUMP’S TAX CUTS DIDN’T BENEFIT U.S. WORKERS, MADE RICH COMPANIES RICHER, ANALYSIS FINDS
Trump and Republican leadership have long touted their tax cuts as a massive boon to America’s working class, if not through direct tax reductions or refunds, then through the trickle-down effect of bonuses and wage increases from their employers who receive massive corporate cuts. “Tax reform is working,” Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan said in January, mentioning Apple’s decision to reward a bonus of $2,500 in stock grants to some Apple employees. “Workers are coming home and telling their families they got a bonus, or they got a raise or they got better benefits.”
But a new analysis of all Fortune 500 companies found only 4.3 percent of workers will receive a one-time bonus or wage increase tied to the business tax cuts, while businesses received nine times more in cuts than what they passed on to their workers, according to Americans for Tax Fairness, a political advocacy group devoted to tax reform. The analysis also found that companies spent 37 times as much on stock buybacks than they did on bonuses and increased wages for workers.
“There are too many disingenuous claims that the Trump and Republican tax cuts for corporations will trickle down to the middle class,” said Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness. “President Trump and Republicans gave huge tax cuts to big drug companies, big oil and other corporations, but corporations are giving back little—if anything—to working families,” said Clemente. “In fact, this [analysis shows] that 433 corporations out of the Fortune 500 have announced no plans to share their tax cuts with employees.”
The newest projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Republican tax plan led to, in part, a 2018 deficit $242 billion higher than previously estimated.
Roughly 36 percent of Americans approve of the Republican tax cuts, according to a March Quinnipiac University Poll and a CNBC poll found that 52 percent of working adults said they had not seen a change to their paychecks since the cuts were passed.
In January, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said 90 percent of all working adults would see increases in their paychecks because of the cuts.
Hmmm, let’s go with your bullshit findings....I’m curious, is there something wrong with companies keeping more of what they generate?
Yep...that whack will also tell you that poor people create jobs.
Yet the tax cuts for the lower classes are temporary, while the tax cuts for the upper classes are permanent. Hmmm I wonder why.See, the middle class did receive that lower tax rate, we are seeing more in our paychecks and we are spending more. The corporations are now hiring more at higher wages. which was the point of the exercise.
And bullshit on corporations hiring more because of the recent tax cuts. They’re putting more on their own pockets and throwing a few one-time peanuts to their employees
Don't you know the rich got rich with 1% return on investments. yep that's the ticket!!!When you give the lower classes tax cuts, that puts more money in their pockets. You know what the poor and middle class do when they have more money? They spend it on goods and services, which increases demand and yes, creates jobs. You know what the already-rich do when you give them tax cuts and put more money in their bank accounts? It stays there, because they’re already well-off and can get by on what they already have. It’s not rocket science. You’re just a dumb, wannabe who drinks the trickle down piss with glee.dude, that fk wants them to go out of business and leave no middle class working.TRUMP’S TAX CUTS DIDN’T BENEFIT U.S. WORKERS, MADE RICH COMPANIES RICHER, ANALYSIS FINDS
Trump and Republican leadership have long touted their tax cuts as a massive boon to America’s working class, if not through direct tax reductions or refunds, then through the trickle-down effect of bonuses and wage increases from their employers who receive massive corporate cuts. “Tax reform is working,” Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan said in January, mentioning Apple’s decision to reward a bonus of $2,500 in stock grants to some Apple employees. “Workers are coming home and telling their families they got a bonus, or they got a raise or they got better benefits.”
But a new analysis of all Fortune 500 companies found only 4.3 percent of workers will receive a one-time bonus or wage increase tied to the business tax cuts, while businesses received nine times more in cuts than what they passed on to their workers, according to Americans for Tax Fairness, a political advocacy group devoted to tax reform. The analysis also found that companies spent 37 times as much on stock buybacks than they did on bonuses and increased wages for workers.
“There are too many disingenuous claims that the Trump and Republican tax cuts for corporations will trickle down to the middle class,” said Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness. “President Trump and Republicans gave huge tax cuts to big drug companies, big oil and other corporations, but corporations are giving back little—if anything—to working families,” said Clemente. “In fact, this [analysis shows] that 433 corporations out of the Fortune 500 have announced no plans to share their tax cuts with employees.”
The newest projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Republican tax plan led to, in part, a 2018 deficit $242 billion higher than previously estimated.
Roughly 36 percent of Americans approve of the Republican tax cuts, according to a March Quinnipiac University Poll and a CNBC poll found that 52 percent of working adults said they had not seen a change to their paychecks since the cuts were passed.
In January, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said 90 percent of all working adults would see increases in their paychecks because of the cuts.
Hmmm, let’s go with your bullshit findings....I’m curious, is there something wrong with companies keeping more of what they generate?
Yep...that whack will also tell you that poor people create jobs.
When you give the lower classes tax cuts, that puts more money in their pockets.
They already have low or negative tax rates.
You know what the already-rich do when you give them tax cuts and put more money in their bank accounts? It stays there, because they’re already well-off and can get by on what they already have.
Really? What's the savings rate of the "already rich"?
When you give the lower classes tax cuts, that puts more money in their pockets. You know what the poor and middle class do when they have more money? They spend it on goods and services, which increases demand and yes, creates jobs. You know what the already-rich do when you give them tax cuts and put more money in their bank accounts? It stays there, because they’re already well-off and can get by on what they already have. It’s not rocket science. You’re just a dumb, wannabe who drinks the trickle down piss with glee.dude, that fk wants them to go out of business and leave no middle class working.TRUMP’S TAX CUTS DIDN’T BENEFIT U.S. WORKERS, MADE RICH COMPANIES RICHER, ANALYSIS FINDS
Trump and Republican leadership have long touted their tax cuts as a massive boon to America’s working class, if not through direct tax reductions or refunds, then through the trickle-down effect of bonuses and wage increases from their employers who receive massive corporate cuts. “Tax reform is working,” Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan said in January, mentioning Apple’s decision to reward a bonus of $2,500 in stock grants to some Apple employees. “Workers are coming home and telling their families they got a bonus, or they got a raise or they got better benefits.”
But a new analysis of all Fortune 500 companies found only 4.3 percent of workers will receive a one-time bonus or wage increase tied to the business tax cuts, while businesses received nine times more in cuts than what they passed on to their workers, according to Americans for Tax Fairness, a political advocacy group devoted to tax reform. The analysis also found that companies spent 37 times as much on stock buybacks than they did on bonuses and increased wages for workers.
“There are too many disingenuous claims that the Trump and Republican tax cuts for corporations will trickle down to the middle class,” said Frank Clemente, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness. “President Trump and Republicans gave huge tax cuts to big drug companies, big oil and other corporations, but corporations are giving back little—if anything—to working families,” said Clemente. “In fact, this [analysis shows] that 433 corporations out of the Fortune 500 have announced no plans to share their tax cuts with employees.”
The newest projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Republican tax plan led to, in part, a 2018 deficit $242 billion higher than previously estimated.
Roughly 36 percent of Americans approve of the Republican tax cuts, according to a March Quinnipiac University Poll and a CNBC poll found that 52 percent of working adults said they had not seen a change to their paychecks since the cuts were passed.
In January, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said 90 percent of all working adults would see increases in their paychecks because of the cuts.
Hmmm, let’s go with your bullshit findings....I’m curious, is there something wrong with companies keeping more of what they generate?
Yep...that whack will also tell you that poor people create jobs.
While 401ks hold stocks, they tend to be held in mutual funds with managers who don't get the call until after the stock collapses. Hedge fund managers get the call before, and save the billionaire's money.Most welfare queens don't own stock. 401k's, mutual funds have stocks. Even Pensions have stocks.. Are you really that stupid? Don't answer, I already know...So, the workers who got a bonus, that didn't help that at all? I wonder how many of the workers have stock in the company that they work for? I bet at least 66%. Bwaaaahhhhaaahhhhaaaaa. You must be a welfare queen or queer....
Most people don't own stock.
On average, public employee pension funds have 60 percent of their assets invested in the stock market, including roughly 15 percent in foreign stock markets. Union pension funds have a slightly smaller share of their assets in the stock market, 57 percent.
Stock Market Investing: Good Enough for Public Employee ...
taxfoundation.org/stock-market-investing-good-enough-public-employee-and-union-pension-funds
