flacaltenn
Diamond Member
They aren't.
I did qualify it with a "to me"
Same basic concept, same guaranteed end results.
It is not the same basic concept. Libertarians have never lobbied for an absence of any and all authority.
"Big L" libertarians lobby often for such a husk of a federal government (and sometimes State governments) that you might not get de jure anarchy, but you would end up with it de facto.
That's not exactly how we CHOSE the two 2 term State Governors to BE our 2016 candidates. BOTH these guy worked to keep their respective states from making the same mistakes that is now bankrupting others. THey contributed GREATLY to keeping those states out of budget and fiscal crisis for the future.
They were WELL LIKED for being fiscally responsible. Not for "husking" their states.
Which ones?
I want to see if they are Libertarians or libertarians.
I was talking about Gary Johnson of N. Mexico and William Weld of Massachusetts. THAT's who we offered America as alternatives to the 2 narcissistic Meglo power whore "winners". They brought humble and tolerant to an election that will be famous for arrogant and divisive.