Mac1958
Diamond Member
.
So this isn't about "reproductive rights" or "women's health" or any of that bullshit. It's about who is paying to keep poor people from reproducing.
Great. Now at least we can all discuss this from a single point of reference.
.
Maybe if all males recused themselves from these discussions, we'd get to a sensible policy a lot sooner.
Here's the thing you wingnuts don't get about health insurance. The employee WORKED for that. He provided time, labor, skill that the employer lacked, and her compensation was in addition to salary health insurance.
In short, her insurance SHOULD cover what she and her doctor think are appropriate. NOT what the employer considers appropriate.
Or we could just do the breathtakingly rational thing of having universal health coverage for all citizens.
I agree. Well, I'd prefer a Medicare/Medicare Supplement-based system for all, a plan that would end our ridiculous, disjointed 5-payer (VA, Medicare, Medicaid, Group/Individual, indigent) joke of a system. You bet. I could provide a long, long list of the benefits of such a system.
Some "wingnut", huh? And by the way, do mean left wingnut or right wingnut?
I just can't get you folks to be honest about pretty much anything. And here, I finally narrow down the discussion to the heart of the matter, and you have to launch into name calling.
But I'm used to it!
.