Ann Coulter On Media's Breitbart Smears...

"Even in death he shows Liberals in their true colors."


On Fox News's Hannity Friday, conservative author Ann Coulter said it best. "Even in death he shows liberals in their true colors."...

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: But, you know, the difference is, you know, when Sarah Palin was attacked, I didn't hear any Democrats in Congress asking, you know, for a resolution on the House floor or I don't know that President Obama called Sarah Palin and expressed such outrage over these things.

ANN COULTER: Are we segueing into the birth control activist? I love that story.

HANNITY: The point is, I'm segueing into a double standard that exists and phony outrage by liberals. That's what bothers me here. You know what? If they want to have free speech and say what they say, let conservatives have the same thing.

COULTER: No. You are right about that. Though, I must say, it's like Andrew Breitbart's last trick because he loved ginning up liberals. I mean, he played this jujitsu with them as do I. But he got them to say the most shocking things and that's why most people like me who follow him on Twitter had to turn off the re-tweet function because you would open up your twitter page and it would be full of things that rhyme with mock bucker.

And, you know, I don't need all that vial coming at me on my web page. But he loved it. And here even in death he shows liberals in their true colors.

HANNITY: All right. Thanks Ann Coulter for being with us. We appreciate it


Read more: Ann Coulter on Media's Breitbart Smear: 'Even in Death He Shows Liberals in Their True Colors' | NewsBusters.org
Ah yes. She was on his show just a few minutes bedew Larry the Cable Guy. :lol::lol::lol:

She's getting a peek at how she will be remembered. Karma can be a bitch, Ann. Look closely. :lol::lol::lol:

Go polish your dildos carpet muncher.

Poor "7th Fleet" Altar Boy....you can only speak of which you know. :lol::lol::lol:
 
You mean I need to become a brainwashed tool like you?

Fascism is a form of socialism. That makes it leftwing. The claim that's rightwing is socialist propaganda.

Holy Fuck you are stupid.

Yes the fascists in Spain were really socialists which explains why they were fighting against the socialists in the Civil War.........

Ever read any Hemingway?

They were fucking communists, turd, and socialists are always fighting each other.

George Orwell would have LOVED you as a character in 1984.
 
And I maintain that he has done nothing that the left has not done, better, louder and more often than he did.

Stop making this a partisan issue. Andy lived his life as he did, and saying so is not a smear.

When your ilk actually posts something about the man that is true, we'll let you know. Until then, you're all just a gang of smear artists.
 
Breitbart enjoyed gotcha videos that were edited in a way to misrepresent the truth but make his opponents look bad.

Just like Jon Stewart, Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, huh?

How is saying that dishonest or evil?

How is posting those any different than what Stewart posts every night? I know, the difference is that Stewart attacks those whom you hate.
 
Fascism is a form of socialism. That makes it leftwing. The claim that's rightwing is socialist propaganda.

No, fascism rejects socialism. Your claim is akin to saying that beef is a form of pork. Get educated.

"There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communists always will."

- Adolph Hitler -

"Of what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party, is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers. All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings."

(Both quotes above are from Hermann Rauschning in Hitler Speaks, London, T. Butterworth, 1940, also called The Voice of Destruction.

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions"

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)


2cyfq0l.jpg
 
I respond to posters in kind, asswipe.
Not a difficult concept.
Apparently for you, it is.

That's really horrible that others talk to you the way you talk to us. Got some examples of you being verbally spoken to in the way you talk to us?

"Us?"

Sorry - I don't address groups of bull-dykes.
That's your function on earth.

Now, put on a strap-on, spike up your hair, act like the man you want to be, and STFU.

Dick.
 
"There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communists always will."

- Adolph Hitler -

"Of what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party, is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers. All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings."

(Both quotes above are from Hermann Rauschning in Hitler Speaks, London, T. Butterworth, 1940, also called The Voice of Destruction.

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions"

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)


2cyfq0l.jpg


So I expect that Shortbus will be posting an apology to you any second now.......

Think I should hold my breath?
 
"There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communists always will."

- Adolph Hitler -

"Of what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party, is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers. All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings."

(Both quotes above are from Hermann Rauschning in Hitler Speaks, London, T. Butterworth, 1940, also called The Voice of Destruction.

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions"

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)


2cyfq0l.jpg


So I expect that Shortbus will be posting an apology to you any second now.......

Think I should hold my breath?

I expect profound silence in response to my post. That's what always happens when leftists are confronted with the irrefutable proof of their lies.
 
So a man dies and according to the left has distorted the truth when alive, he is a bad person, yet when a man that killed a woman died, they praised that man. The double standard is very telling.


Perhaps when confronted with evidence that he had aired selectively edited clips of Sherrod, Briatbart offer something of an apology. Like Sen. Kennedy did.

"I felt morally obligated to plead guilty to the charge of leaving the scene of an accident. No words on my part can possibly express the terrible pain and suffering I feel over this tragic incident. This last week has been an agonizing one for me and for the members of my family, and the grief we feel over the loss of a wonderful friend will remain with us the rest of our lives."

But no, the rabid right wants to draw an equilence to a man who served in the Senate with distinction with this guy.

Not going to happen.
 
So a man dies and according to the left has distorted the truth when alive, he is a bad person, yet when a man that killed a woman died, they praised that man. The double standard is very telling.


Perhaps when confronted with evidence that he had aired selectively edited clips of Sherrod, Briatbart offer something of an apology. Like Sen. Kennedy did.

"I felt morally obligated to plead guilty to the charge of leaving the scene of an accident. No words on my part can possibly express the terrible pain and suffering I feel over this tragic incident. This last week has been an agonizing one for me and for the members of my family, and the grief we feel over the loss of a wonderful friend will remain with us the rest of our lives."

But no, the rabid right wants to draw an equilence to a man who served in the Senate with distinction with this guy.

Not going to happen.

Oh puhleeze. You must be the biggest sucker in this entire forum, and that's a difficult standard to meet.

Kennedy was a lying, power hungry pig who would say anything to get himself off the hook.
 
"There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communists always will."

- Adolph Hitler -

"Of what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party, is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers. All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings."

(Both quotes above are from Hermann Rauschning in Hitler Speaks, London, T. Butterworth, 1940, also called The Voice of Destruction.

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions"

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)

Cool. How about something from Mussolini?
 
Perhaps when confronted with evidence that he had aired selectively edited clips of Sherrod, Briatbart offer something of an apology. Like Sen. Kennedy did.

"I felt morally obligated to plead guilty to the charge of leaving the scene of an accident. No words on my part can possibly express the terrible pain and suffering I feel over this tragic incident. This last week has been an agonizing one for me and for the members of my family, and the grief we feel over the loss of a wonderful friend will remain with us the rest of our lives."

But no, the rabid right wants to draw an equilence to a man who served in the Senate with distinction with this guy.

Not going to happen.

Please provide some proof that the video Breitbart posted was "selectively edited". Here is the video posted and it's accompanied blog post.


In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. She refers him to a white lawyer.

Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_xCeItxbQY&feature=player_embedded]NAACP Bigotry in their ranks - YouTube[/ame]
 
Perhaps when confronted with evidence that he had aired selectively edited clips of Sherrod, Briatbart offer something of an apology. Like Sen. Kennedy did.

No doubt you spoke ill of Edward Murrow when he died. After all, Murrow altered the news that America was privileged to for 30 years. Not just altering clips, but entire stories.

Or was that different, since he promoted leftism?
 
Right on schedule.

Seriously, it's my signature, isn't it? Well, don't write stupid things and people won't repeat the stupid things you say.

Whining about negs? How fucking embarrassing for you.

idiot.

Uhm, no. Not whining at all. Just find it funny that Warrior consistently emails me the same message every time he can.

You could set your clock to it.

It's not an 'email', twit... it's a PM... or Private Message. And you have the option to turn those off if they offend you.

I can set my clock by your idiocy.... but it would be wrong... because you always are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top