Another example of lib hypocrisy. Lena Dunham vs. the Duggars

Again......and for the last time for extremely dense right wingers.......

The difference which should show NO hypocrisy is this.......

One molester (if you choose to call it that) is a 3rd tier actress/producer .......the other, is a member of the Family Research Council whose MAIN objective is to "promote family values"........and molestation of your younger sisters surely is NOT part of those family values.....

Both cases are unsavory...BUT one tries to tell others, "do as I say not what I do...."

If you cannot discern the difference you're beyond hope

Difference being. One knew they were wrong and turned themself in to authorities and took up counciling.

The other brags about it openly.
He didn't turn himself into the authorities. His parents told their friend the pedophile about it.

He turned himself in to authorities when he was 13. It's documented.
 
shall we look at the age differences....everyone says poor dugger was just playing doctor....he was 14 and one of the kids was 5....

lena durham was 7 and her sister was 1......why isnt that playing doctor....
 
Again......and for the last time for extremely dense right wingers.......

The difference which should show NO hypocrisy is this.......

One molester (if you choose to call it that) is a 3rd tier actress/producer .......the other, is a member of the Family Research Council whose MAIN objective is to "promote family values"........and molestation of your younger sisters surely is NOT part of those family values.....

Both cases are unsavory...BUT one tries to tell others, "do as I say not what I do...."

If you cannot discern the difference you're beyond hope

Difference being. One knew they were wrong and turned themself in to authorities and took up counciling.

The other brags about it openly.
He didn't turn himself into the authorities. His parents told their friend the pedophile about it.

He turned himself in to authorities when he was 13. It's documented.
You are full of shit.
 
how can it be documented when the court records were destroyed

Um... A judge has ordered them destroyed NOW. The justification the Police chief used to illegally release them to press was that ... Even though he confessed at 13 and was a juvenile. The police didn't investigate because he was in therapy (which the judge disagreed with).
 
Again......and for the last time for extremely dense right wingers.......

The difference which should show NO hypocrisy is this.......

One molester (if you choose to call it that) is a 3rd tier actress/producer .......the other, is a member of the Family Research Council whose MAIN objective is to "promote family values"........and molestation of your younger sisters surely is NOT part of those family values.....

Both cases are unsavory...BUT one tries to tell others, "do as I say not what I do...."

If you cannot discern the difference you're beyond hope

Difference being. One knew they were wrong and turned themself in to authorities and took up counciling.

The other brags about it openly.
He didn't turn himself into the authorities. His parents told their friend the pedophile about it.

He turned himself in to authorities when he was 13. It's documented.
You are full of shit.

You dont know what you are talking about in relation to the records. Don't blame me because you are wrong.
 
:rolleyes: He confessed when he was thirteen that he molested his sisters when he was fourteen and fifteen?

What a stupid putz.
 
stephonie you mean
picgifs-laughing-0304594.gif


and yet it is stephanie standing up for the dugger....so apparently she only has issues with left wing child abusers....

great standard there stephanie....
 
Pardon me. 13 years ago. That would make him 13/14 years old. Miss semantics police. He is 27 now.
 
he was in therapy with whom? the convicted child porn leo?

....good question, AND what about that "loving family" providing the sisters.....the VICTIMS in all this........with some therapy?

He was sent away from the house when they found out and was not allowed to live at home.
Not the first time and not the second time. He didn't get removed and stopped until the third time. All the molesting that took place after the first time the parents found out are in part the fault of the parents.
 
he was in therapy with whom? the convicted child porn leo?

....good question, AND what about that "loving family" providing the sisters.....the VICTIMS in all this........with some therapy?

He was sent away from the house when they found out and was not allowed to live at home.
Not the first time and not the second time. He didn't get removed and stopped until the third time. All the molesting that took place after the first time the parents found out are in part the fault of the parents.
Which is probably why they never went to the police. THEY could have been arrested. Personal responsibility is a bitch when you're a craven media whore like the Duggars.
 
he was in therapy with whom? the convicted child porn leo?

....good question, AND what about that "loving family" providing the sisters.....the VICTIMS in all this........with some therapy?

He was sent away from the house when they found out and was not allowed to live at home.
Not the first time and not the second time. He didn't get removed and stopped until the third time. All the molesting that took place after the first time the parents found out are in part the fault of the parents.

he was in therapy with whom? the convicted child porn leo?

....good question, AND what about that "loving family" providing the sisters.....the VICTIMS in all this........with some therapy?

Yes. We all know how much the Liberals worry about the "victims"... So much so they illegally released their information to In Touch Magazine.

Save it scumbag.
 

Forum List

Back
Top