Another Lie debunked-IG report concludes FBI did not spy on trump campaign

[The Purge]

then why did Biden bribe them to fire him?

why don't we ask them what they expected? I would like one of those jobs, wouldn't you?

As I explained already, Biden wanted Shokin out because he was corrupt. What is so controversial?

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

A bribe would imply it was illegal. There’s nothing illegal about making our foreign aid contingent on actions taken for the benefit of Ukraine and the US.

LOL, thats exactly what the dem clowns are trying to impeach Trump for, even though he didn't do it. Thanks for admitting that the dems are FOS

You apparently don’t understand the actual argument Dems are making. That’s okay. I’m here to explain it to you.

Trump was using a bribe to achieve a personal benefit. That would be impeachable. Biden was using a “bribe” (not actually what it is but let’s call it that for the sake of argument) to achieve a benefit for the country. That’s not impeachable. In fact, it’s the entire point.

Hope that makes sense.

Since they closed the other thread you were lying in...


AND being we have a TREATY with Ukraine to fight CRIME AND CORRUPTION, put into law in 1998 by Blow Job Clinton don't you understand....
Letter: Trump was lawful when unearthing Ukraine corruption - News - The Daily ...


Oct 27, 2019 · Did you know there's a comprehensive treaty agreement that allows cooperation between the U.S. and Ukraine in the investigation of crime and corruption....

And since when does a VP get a free pass on his obvious CRIME and Corruption....Benedict Arnold was a hero and patriot BEFORE HE BACAME A TRAITOR!

You mean to tell me because you are running in a race for president. you are not allowed to be investigated of a crimr....shell Mueller had NO EVIDENCE of a crime and he contacted 13 different countries trying to find a crime Trump NEVER COMMITTED!

You really suck at REAL NEWS!

 

[colfax_m]

1. Trump has continued the lowering of the unemployment under Barack Obama.

The most dramatic drop in black unemployment came under President Barack Obama, when it fell from a recession high of 16.8 percent in March 2010 to 7.8 percent in January 2017.
AP FACT CHECK: Trump on unemployment for blacks, Latinos​

2. Same thing as above. The S&P 500 Is at an All Time High—But It Still Performed Far Better Under Obama Than Trump

3. Answer is the same as 2

4. No, unfortunately the "meeting with Kim" was not a fantasy...how you spin it as positive is beyond me.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...0305f8-3ab4-11e9-a06c-3ec8ed509d15_story.html
​

5. Say again your last, over. Oh, and shall I dig up some of your old posts from when Obama wanted to bring troops home?

Pentagon sends new wave of troops to Saudi Arabia even as Trump calls for ending wars
​

6. The tax cut that benefited the 1%? Again, how are you possibly spinning that as a positive? It added to the deficit, businesses have not responded as "advertised" and the middle class has seen zero benefit. How is this a good thing?

Tax Day Update: Americans Still Not Seeing Tax Cut Benefit
​

7. What do the sycophants at his ego fests have anything to do with anything? Bernie draws big crowds too but he'll never be President.

one at a time

6. the tax cuts benefitted everyone that pays taxes. Yes, it did nothing for the 50% who pay no taxes, its hard to cut zero. and yes, 5% of 1 million is more than 5% of 50 thousand-------------so fricken what?

7. Bernie has never drawn a crowd of 30,000, Trump does it at every rally.

Wrong. The tax cuts didn't do anything except pay off the donor class.

The 2017 Tax Cuts Didn't Work, The Data Prove It

Column: A devastating analysis of the tax cut shows it’s done virtually no economic good

Fishy, Trump lies. He lies easier than that obese blog breathes. He's lying to you.

Elizabeth Warren vs Donald Trump: Whose 2020 rallies draw the biggest crowds?

the tax cuts for small businesses and corporations are part of the reason for the low UE rate and the growth in the stock market. and yes, a 5% across the board tax cut saves more for a guy making 20 million than for a guy making 50 thousand. So what? and its also true that tax cuts have no affect on someone who is paying zero taxes (50% of america). again, so fricken what?

You didn't bother to read any of the links did you? The tax cuts did NOTHING.

The independent, non-partisan Congressional Research Service just released a report showing that the 2017 tax cuts for the richest Americans and corporations did not work. This confirms what anybody who has been looking at the data already knew. Investment did not boom and workers will not see the promised bump in pay . Instead, the federal government incurred massive deficits while wealth inequality increased to its highest level in three decades.​

Tell us when and where Warren has ever had a crowd of 30,000 or more, give us the place and date and proof of the headcount.

Trump doesn't get that many people. He lies.

List of rallies for the 2016 Donald Trump presidential campaign - Wikipedia

so the current UE rates are faked? the DOW is faked? the wage report is faked? your 401K balance is faked?

you are a victim of the lying media.

as to Trump rallys, All you need to do is watch one, the cameras capture the crowds, or are the cameras lying too?

Unemployment was falling and wages were rising well before the tax cut. There was no discernible difference after the tax cut was passed.

Yes, the stock market went up but most of the gains were well before the tax cut too. In fact, since Jan 2017, the Dow is up like 3%ish per year. Furthermore, the benefits of a climbing market are very unevenly distributed. Half the country has no money in the market and those that do, almost 90% is owned by the top 10% of the country by wealth.

Just thought I’d introduce some facts.

 

[Redfish]

then why did Biden bribe them to fire him?

why don't we ask them what they expected? I would like one of those jobs, wouldn't you?

As I explained already, Biden wanted Shokin out because he was corrupt. What is so controversial?

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

There was no bribe.

Listen to the tape. Listen to what Biden said. It was clearly a bribe. fire the guy of you don't get the money, is effectively what he said, and then "son of a bitch, he was fired".

Yes and? Biden had congressional support. Everything he did was above board and not for personal gain. He didn't have to hide his phone transcripts on a server meant for the most highly classified intelligence. He did nothing wrong...Unlike Trump.

Of course you won't bother reading this. You like to stay ignorant.

What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine

the NY times????? the mouthpiece of the DNC? Are you serious?

not for personal gain? how about family gain?

geez, I cannot believe your naivete.

 

[Seawytch]

these words from the cite in the OP say it all:

" citing people familiar with a draft of the report."

second hand, from unnamed sources "familiar with a draft"

in other words--------------------bullshit!

Keep trying to convince yourself.

is it not second hand from an unnamed source? is it not someone "assuming" what is in the report?

why don't we wait and see what it actually says on Monday?

Sure, we can wait...waiting won't change that you're going to be very disappointed with the result.

we shall see. please be honest about what it actually says when it comes out tomorrow.

Wow, talk about irony. You haven't been honest once in this thread. You have done nothing but repeat long debunked talking points that were usually made up on the spot by Trump himself.

I'll be honest now about the report. It's going to show that some low level FBI agents made mistakes, but that the "oranges" of the Russia Investigation were warranted and legal.

 

[Redfish]

one at a time

6. the tax cuts benefitted everyone that pays taxes. Yes, it did nothing for the 50% who pay no taxes, its hard to cut zero. and yes, 5% of 1 million is more than 5% of 50 thousand-------------so fricken what?

7. Bernie has never drawn a crowd of 30,000, Trump does it at every rally.

Wrong. The tax cuts didn't do anything except pay off the donor class.

The 2017 Tax Cuts Didn't Work, The Data Prove It

Column: A devastating analysis of the tax cut shows it’s done virtually no economic good

Fishy, Trump lies. He lies easier than that obese blog breathes. He's lying to you.

Elizabeth Warren vs Donald Trump: Whose 2020 rallies draw the biggest crowds?

the tax cuts for small businesses and corporations are part of the reason for the low UE rate and the growth in the stock market. and yes, a 5% across the board tax cut saves more for a guy making 20 million than for a guy making 50 thousand. So what? and its also true that tax cuts have no affect on someone who is paying zero taxes (50% of america). again, so fricken what?

You didn't bother to read any of the links did you? The tax cuts did NOTHING.

The independent, non-partisan Congressional Research Service just released a report showing that the 2017 tax cuts for the richest Americans and corporations did not work. This confirms what anybody who has been looking at the data already knew. Investment did not boom and workers will not see the promised bump in pay . Instead, the federal government incurred massive deficits while wealth inequality increased to its highest level in three decades.​

Tell us when and where Warren has ever had a crowd of 30,000 or more, give us the place and date and proof of the headcount.

Trump doesn't get that many people. He lies.

List of rallies for the 2016 Donald Trump presidential campaign - Wikipedia

so the current UE rates are faked? the DOW is faked? the wage report is faked? your 401K balance is faked?

you are a victim of the lying media.

as to Trump rallys, All you need to do is watch one, the cameras capture the crowds, or are the cameras lying too?

Unemployment was falling and wages were rising well before the tax cut. There was no discernible difference after the tax cut was passed.

Yes, the stock market went up but most of the gains were well before the tax cut too. In fact, since Jan 2017, the Dow is up like 3%ish per year. Furthermore, the benefits of a climbing market are very unevenly distributed. Half the country has no money in the market and those that do, almost 90% is owned by the top 10% of the country by wealth.

Just thought I’d introduce some facts.

the tax cuts benefitted me and everyone I know. If you missed out, sorry.

and Yes, rich people have lots of money, that's what rich means.

 

[The Purge]

And being Solomon a great reporter is also in Schitt's illegal phone call scheme

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

Sep 26, 2019 · Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative. ... In addition, Burisma’s American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration

Because as we all have seen the FBI is full of liars and deep state operatives....McCabe was fired for it and is still under investigation!

 

[Seawytch]

As I explained already, Biden wanted Shokin out because he was corrupt. What is so controversial?

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

There was no bribe.

Listen to the tape. Listen to what Biden said. It was clearly a bribe. fire the guy of you don't get the money, is effectively what he said, and then "son of a bitch, he was fired".

Yes and? Biden had congressional support. Everything he did was above board and not for personal gain. He didn't have to hide his phone transcripts on a server meant for the most highly classified intelligence. He did nothing wrong...Unlike Trump.

Of course you won't bother reading this. You like to stay ignorant.

What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine

the NY times????? the mouthpiece of the DNC? Are you serious?

not for personal gain? how about family gain?

geez, I cannot believe your naivete.

Like I said, you WANT to remain ignorant. It's why you're such a good little Trump Cultists.

 

[Redfish]

these words from the cite in the OP say it all:

" citing people familiar with a draft of the report."

second hand, from unnamed sources "familiar with a draft"

in other words--------------------bullshit!

Keep trying to convince yourself.

is it not second hand from an unnamed source? is it not someone "assuming" what is in the report?

why don't we wait and see what it actually says on Monday?

Sure, we can wait...waiting won't change that you're going to be very disappointed with the result.

we shall see. please be honest about what it actually says when it comes out tomorrow.

Wow, talk about irony. You haven't been honest once in this thread. You have done nothing but repeat long debunked talking points that were usually made up on the spot by Trump himself.

I'll be honest now about the report. It's going to show that some low level FYI agents made mistakes, but that the "oranges" of the Russia Investigation were warranted and legal.

so you have an advance copy? insider information? I understand that that is what you are hoping for, but you may be disappointed. We shall see.

 

[colfax_m]

As I explained already, Biden wanted Shokin out because he was corrupt. What is so controversial?

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

A bribe would imply it was illegal. There’s nothing illegal about making our foreign aid contingent on actions taken for the benefit of Ukraine and the US.

LOL, thats exactly what the dem clowns are trying to impeach Trump for, even though he didn't do it. Thanks for admitting that the dems are FOS

You apparently don’t understand the actual argument Dems are making. That’s okay. I’m here to explain it to you.

Trump was using a bribe to achieve a personal benefit. That would be impeachable. Biden was using a “bribe” (not actually what it is but let’s call it that for the sake of argument) to achieve a benefit for the country. That’s not impeachable. In fact, it’s the entire point.

Hope that makes sense.

Since they closed the other thread you were lying in...


AND being we have a TREATY with Ukraine to fight CRIME AND CORRUPTION, put into law in 1998 by Blow Job Clinton don't you understand....
Letter: Trump was lawful when unearthing Ukraine corruption - News - The Daily ...


Oct 27, 2019 · Did you know there's a comprehensive treaty agreement that allows cooperation between the U.S. and Ukraine in the investigation of crime and corruption....

And since when does a VP get a free pass on his obvious CRIME and Corruption....Benedict Arnold was a hero and patriot BEFORE HE BACAME A TRAITOR!

You mean to tell me because you are running in a race for president. you are not allowed to be investigated of a crimr....shell Mueller had NO EVIDENCE of a crime and he contacted 13 different countries trying to find a crime Trump NEVER COMMITTED!

You really suck at REAL NEWS!

The treaty be relevant except that was no actual request for cooperation.

Ukraine’s prosecutor general : Barr didn’t ask for a joint investigation into the Bidens

Attorney General William Barr never asked for a joint investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden, according to top Ukrainian prosecutor Ruslan Ryaboshapka.

Are you beginning to see why some might believe the “investigation” into Biden was a sham?

 

[The Purge]

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

A bribe would imply it was illegal. There’s nothing illegal about making our foreign aid contingent on actions taken for the benefit of Ukraine and the US.

LOL, thats exactly what the dem clowns are trying to impeach Trump for, even though he didn't do it. Thanks for admitting that the dems are FOS

You apparently don’t understand the actual argument Dems are making. That’s okay. I’m here to explain it to you.

Trump was using a bribe to achieve a personal benefit. That would be impeachable. Biden was using a “bribe” (not actually what it is but let’s call it that for the sake of argument) to achieve a benefit for the country. That’s not impeachable. In fact, it’s the entire point.

Hope that makes sense.

Since they closed the other thread you were lying in...


AND being we have a TREATY with Ukraine to fight CRIME AND CORRUPTION, put into law in 1998 by Blow Job Clinton don't you understand....
Letter: Trump was lawful when unearthing Ukraine corruption - News - The Daily ...


Oct 27, 2019 · Did you know there's a comprehensive treaty agreement that allows cooperation between the U.S. and Ukraine in the investigation of crime and corruption....

And since when does a VP get a free pass on his obvious CRIME and Corruption....Benedict Arnold was a hero and patriot BEFORE HE BACAME A TRAITOR!

You mean to tell me because you are running in a race for president. you are not allowed to be investigated of a crimr....shell Mueller had NO EVIDENCE of a crime and he contacted 13 different countries trying to find a crime Trump NEVER COMMITTED!

You really suck at REAL NEWS!

The treaty be relevant except that was no actual request for cooperation.

Ukraine’s prosecutor general : Barr didn’t ask for a joint investigation into the Bidens

Attorney General William Barr never asked for a joint investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden, according to top Ukrainian prosecutor Ruslan Ryaboshapka.

Are you beginning to see why some might believe the “investigation” into Biden was a sham?

And where does it state that a corrupt government be notified as long as a signed treaty for such undet a different regime is still valid?

The more investigation the more crime and corruption is revealed
Ukraine widens probe against Burisma founder to embezzlement of state funds - Reuters
Nov 20, 2019 · Ukraine has widened its investigation into the founder of ... investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son ... The document, only part of which was visible, showed Kulyk ..

Want to try more lies

 

[Redfish]

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

There was no bribe.

Listen to the tape. Listen to what Biden said. It was clearly a bribe. fire the guy of you don't get the money, is effectively what he said, and then "son of a bitch, he was fired".

Yes and? Biden had congressional support. Everything he did was above board and not for personal gain. He didn't have to hide his phone transcripts on a server meant for the most highly classified intelligence. He did nothing wrong...Unlike Trump.

Of course you won't bother reading this. You like to stay ignorant.

What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine

the NY times????? the mouthpiece of the DNC? Are you serious?

not for personal gain? how about family gain?

geez, I cannot believe your naivete.

Like I said, you WANT to remain ignorant. It's why you're such a good little Trump Cultists.

Ignorance is believing what you hear from CNN, MSNBC, NY times, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, and crooked hillary.

What I know is that the country is in the best financial condition its been in in my lifetime and I've been around a long time. Maybe Trump had nothing to do with that, maybe its all the result of things that Bush and Obama did, but logic and experience tell me otherwise.

 

[Redfish]

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

A bribe would imply it was illegal. There’s nothing illegal about making our foreign aid contingent on actions taken for the benefit of Ukraine and the US.

LOL, thats exactly what the dem clowns are trying to impeach Trump for, even though he didn't do it. Thanks for admitting that the dems are FOS

You apparently don’t understand the actual argument Dems are making. That’s okay. I’m here to explain it to you.

Trump was using a bribe to achieve a personal benefit. That would be impeachable. Biden was using a “bribe” (not actually what it is but let’s call it that for the sake of argument) to achieve a benefit for the country. That’s not impeachable. In fact, it’s the entire point.

Hope that makes sense.

Since they closed the other thread you were lying in...


AND being we have a TREATY with Ukraine to fight CRIME AND CORRUPTION, put into law in 1998 by Blow Job Clinton don't you understand....
Letter: Trump was lawful when unearthing Ukraine corruption - News - The Daily ...


Oct 27, 2019 · Did you know there's a comprehensive treaty agreement that allows cooperation between the U.S. and Ukraine in the investigation of crime and corruption....

And since when does a VP get a free pass on his obvious CRIME and Corruption....Benedict Arnold was a hero and patriot BEFORE HE BACAME A TRAITOR!

You mean to tell me because you are running in a race for president. you are not allowed to be investigated of a crimr....shell Mueller had NO EVIDENCE of a crime and he contacted 13 different countries trying to find a crime Trump NEVER COMMITTED!

You really suck at REAL NEWS!

The treaty be relevant except that was no actual request for cooperation.

Ukraine’s prosecutor general : Barr didn’t ask for a joint investigation into the Bidens

Attorney General William Barr never asked for a joint investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden, according to top Ukrainian prosecutor Ruslan Ryaboshapka.

Are you beginning to see why some might believe the “investigation” into Biden was a sham?

you said, "no actual request for cooperation" LOL, thats exactly what the dems are trying to impeach Trump for, a "request for cooperation". But there was none, right? you just confirmed it.

 

[Seawytch]

Keep trying to convince yourself.

is it not second hand from an unnamed source? is it not someone "assuming" what is in the report?

why don't we wait and see what it actually says on Monday?

Sure, we can wait...waiting won't change that you're going to be very disappointed with the result.

we shall see. please be honest about what it actually says when it comes out tomorrow.

Wow, talk about irony. You haven't been honest once in this thread. You have done nothing but repeat long debunked talking points that were usually made up on the spot by Trump himself.

I'll be honest now about the report. It's going to show that some low level FYI agents made mistakes, but that the "oranges" of the Russia Investigation were warranted and legal.

so you have an advance copy? insider information? I understand that that is what you are hoping for, but you may be disappointed. We shall see.

Yes, I have an advance copy. Care to wager and see who is right?

 

[Redfish]

is it not second hand from an unnamed source? is it not someone "assuming" what is in the report?

why don't we wait and see what it actually says on Monday?

Sure, we can wait...waiting won't change that you're going to be very disappointed with the result.

we shall see. please be honest about what it actually says when it comes out tomorrow.

Wow, talk about irony. You haven't been honest once in this thread. You have done nothing but repeat long debunked talking points that were usually made up on the spot by Trump himself.

I'll be honest now about the report. It's going to show that some low level FYI agents made mistakes, but that the "oranges" of the Russia Investigation were warranted and legal.

so you have an advance copy? insider information? I understand that that is what you are hoping for, but you may be disappointed. We shall see.

Yes, I have an advance copy. Care to wager and see who is right?

post or cite it so we can all read it. You are lying once again, but we expect that from you.

 

[The Purge]

is it not second hand from an unnamed source? is it not someone "assuming" what is in the report?

why don't we wait and see what it actually says on Monday?

Sure, we can wait...waiting won't change that you're going to be very disappointed with the result.

we shall see. please be honest about what it actually says when it comes out tomorrow.

Wow, talk about irony. You haven't been honest once in this thread. You have done nothing but repeat long debunked talking points that were usually made up on the spot by Trump himself.

I'll be honest now about the report. It's going to show that some low level FYI agents made mistakes, but that the "oranges" of the Russia Investigation were warranted and legal.

so you have an advance copy? insider information? I understand that that is what you are hoping for, but you may be disappointed. We shall see.

Yes, I have an advance copy. Care to wager and see who is right?

You are full of shit. Lesbian!....UNLESS you are also a PAID DISINFORMATION SPECIALIST FROM THE DNC!

 

[Seawytch]

There was no bribe.

Listen to the tape. Listen to what Biden said. It was clearly a bribe. fire the guy of you don't get the money, is effectively what he said, and then "son of a bitch, he was fired".

Yes and? Biden had congressional support. Everything he did was above board and not for personal gain. He didn't have to hide his phone transcripts on a server meant for the most highly classified intelligence. He did nothing wrong...Unlike Trump.

Of course you won't bother reading this. You like to stay ignorant.

What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine

the NY times????? the mouthpiece of the DNC? Are you serious?

not for personal gain? how about family gain?

geez, I cannot believe your naivete.

Like I said, you WANT to remain ignorant. It's why you're such a good little Trump Cultists.

Ignorance is believing what you hear from CNN, MSNBC, NY times, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, and crooked hillary.

What I know is that the country is in the best financial condition its been in in my lifetime and I've been around a long time. Maybe Trump had nothing to do with that, maybe its all the result of things that Bush and Obama did, but logic and experience tell me otherwise.

No, Fishy, ignorance is believing Trump. He lies. The major news organizations do not. They report the news. The facts are simply not on your side which is why you dismiss them all.

 

[Redfish]

is it not second hand from an unnamed source? is it not someone "assuming" what is in the report?

why don't we wait and see what it actually says on Monday?

Sure, we can wait...waiting won't change that you're going to be very disappointed with the result.

we shall see. please be honest about what it actually says when it comes out tomorrow.

Wow, talk about irony. You haven't been honest once in this thread. You have done nothing but repeat long debunked talking points that were usually made up on the spot by Trump himself.

I'll be honest now about the report. It's going to show that some low level FYI agents made mistakes, but that the "oranges" of the Russia Investigation were warranted and legal.

so you have an advance copy? insider information? I understand that that is what you are hoping for, but you may be disappointed. We shall see.

Yes, I have an advance copy. Care to wager and see who is right?

sure, we can bet on it, but only if we can also bet of who wins the presidential election in 2020.

 

[colfax_m]

As I explained already, Biden wanted Shokin out because he was corrupt. What is so controversial?

Did he bribe officials in other countries to fire corrupt officials?

A bribe would imply it was illegal. There’s nothing illegal about making our foreign aid contingent on actions taken for the benefit of Ukraine and the US.

LOL, thats exactly what the dem clowns are trying to impeach Trump for, even though he didn't do it. Thanks for admitting that the dems are FOS

You apparently don’t understand the actual argument Dems are making. That’s okay. I’m here to explain it to you.

Trump was using a bribe to achieve a personal benefit. That would be impeachable. Biden was using a “bribe” (not actually what it is but let’s call it that for the sake of argument) to achieve a benefit for the country. That’s not impeachable. In fact, it’s the entire point.

Hope that makes sense.

I understand the convoluted argument the dems are trying to make, but there is no evidence to support it.

However, we have Biden on tape threatening Ukraine with withholding 1 billion in aid if they don't fire the prosecutor looking into Burisma where his son was getting 50K per month for doing nothing.

BTW, the kids of Pelosi, Kerry, and Romney were also on that board doing nothing but getting paid big bucks.

Are you so naive that you don't see what that was all about?

When you read that the prosecutor was investigating Biden’s company and that he did nothing for them, did you question that information or did you just accept it as fact?

 

[Redfish]

Listen to the tape. Listen to what Biden said. It was clearly a bribe. fire the guy of you don't get the money, is effectively what he said, and then "son of a bitch, he was fired".

Yes and? Biden had congressional support. Everything he did was above board and not for personal gain. He didn't have to hide his phone transcripts on a server meant for the most highly classified intelligence. He did nothing wrong...Unlike Trump.

Of course you won't bother reading this. You like to stay ignorant.

What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine

the NY times????? the mouthpiece of the DNC? Are you serious?

not for personal gain? how about family gain?

geez, I cannot believe your naivete.

Like I said, you WANT to remain ignorant. It's why you're such a good little Trump Cultists.

Ignorance is believing what you hear from CNN, MSNBC, NY times, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, and crooked hillary.

What I know is that the country is in the best financial condition its been in in my lifetime and I've been around a long time. Maybe Trump had nothing to do with that, maybe its all the result of things that Bush and Obama did, but logic and experience tell me otherwise.

No, Fishy, ignorance is believing Trump. He lies. The major news organizations do not. They report the news. The facts are simply not on your side which is why you dismiss them all.

you are getting pathetic in your worship of the lying media. are you really so dumb that you think they are telling you the truth? I bet you think the idiots on the view are also telling the truth.

 

[Seawytch]

Sure, we can wait...waiting won't change that you're going to be very disappointed with the result.

we shall see. please be honest about what it actually says when it comes out tomorrow.

Wow, talk about irony. You haven't been honest once in this thread. You have done nothing but repeat long debunked talking points that were usually made up on the spot by Trump himself.

I'll be honest now about the report. It's going to show that some low level FYI agents made mistakes, but that the "oranges" of the Russia Investigation were warranted and legal.

so you have an advance copy? insider information? I understand that that is what you are hoping for, but you may be disappointed. We shall see.

Yes, I have an advance copy. Care to wager and see who is right?

post or cite it so we can all read it. You are lying once again, but we expect that from you.

I have the same "advance copy" we all have, moron, the leaks. Oh, and the FBI report that says the same thing. So, care to wager on who is right about what the AG report says?