Another school shooting....time to arm the teachers?

Check above for the comments to this . :lol: Simple little losers pretending to be Republican. Don't need em, don't want such trash in the GOP.

Sane America laughs at the fascists, such as JB and others.

JB is interesting in that his latent homo-erotica becomes quite evidence when he gets mad and projects his self-loathing onto others. Many of the SA socialist leadership he idolizes suffered from this illness.

His mental disease lessens somewhat when he is on his meds, but then he becomes even more angry.

I carry conceal. I imagine you do. No one is talking about taking our guns in power. What gun ban are you worried about?

Sane America is laughing at the anti-gun and the gun crazies.

Read the blogs, the newspapers online, and google it.

Jake the fucking Liar strikes again.

You dont fool anyone, Twinky. The gun grabbing whores like you are trying to accomplish by degree what you cant accomplish by an honest fucking vote.

Go tohell.
 
But since what you propose is known to NOT WORK, the only thing you are trying to accomplish is to disarm the public. You could not give a damn about anyones kids.

Except that it HAS worked in Australia, Canada, the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Japan...

The public doesn't need to be armed.

Yes the public does need to be armed. Tools like you are the reason we need to be armed.

No, you don't. really. You cling to your gun and your bible because you think they give you control of your life, but they really don't.
 
Except that it HAS worked in Australia, Canada, the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Japan...

The public doesn't need to be armed.

Yes the public does need to be armed. Tools like you are the reason we need to be armed.

No, you don't. really. You cling to your gun and your bible because you think they give you control of your life, but they really don't.

You're the one calling for the murder of Wayne LaPeirre
 
Except that it HAS worked in Australia, Canada, the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Japan...

The public doesn't need to be armed.

Yes the public does need to be armed. Tools like you are the reason we need to be armed.

No, you don't. really. You cling to your gun and your bible because you think they give you control of your life, but they really don't.

Nobody is clinging to anything, you fascist.

And we will keep them as free men have since the beginning of time.

Historically the line of seperation between slaves, peasants and serfs at the bottom of society and free men above them was the right to bear arms in public. The historical meaning of the desire of fascist pigs like you to disarm us is unmistakable.
 
Here is my question to you guys because I am confused.

When you guys say "teachers should be allowed to carry" which teachers are you referring to?



This one!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3rDokiFU9w]The Substitute Movie - YouTube[/ame]
Of course this was a movie, but it was a movie none the less that was drawn out of real known situations that had gotten bad and/or out of hand in America, and worse it was allowed to get like this in public schools, and right beneath the nations noses, where as they ignored it all for to long, and this upon finally doing the right things early on about it as they should have.

This idea that all people are equal without character checks being waged upon them first, and that they should just be openly accepted without proving oneself to be good, is simply a huge fail in this nation, and this nation was completely idiotic to have ever allowed these types of goings on, to wildly be going on within the public school system, and this no matter where it was all being drawn from.

It is totally unexceptable, and it should have never been allowed to get like this to begin with. It still is being found within the public school systems in America, and that is ashame for all the good kids whom want to learn, and also be there for all the right reasons.
 
Last edited:
The righr to bear arm is the law of this land
If you don't like that you are free to leave
 
Anyone who is:

1. Qualified and already issued a concealed carry permit.

2. Voluntarily screened for mental problems and/or criminal background.

3. Only those who *want* to do it.

4. And the gun would be concealed so dont worry about pissing your pants at the sight aof a fucking gun.

Why cant you stupid shit understand this simple approach to stopping this shit?

The Isrealis and Thais are ALREADY DOING IT WITH GREAT SUCCESS.

So what if the school they teach has armed personnel? Do we just do away with the trust of armed personnel to save us from an attacker?

Would you mind translating that question into comprehensible English?

I seriously do not understand your question, though I doubt the sincerety behind it anyway

Sorry if you don't comprehend english
 
Is someone suggesting we arm the union thug school teachers? Next it will be union longshoremen thugs then the union police thugs, where will it end? Besides I don't think my fifth grade teacher could even lift a gun, and even though she was a union thug she didn't like to hurt people.
 
Since Jim likes to hurl insults it is thus we've come to an en passé.


If someone can show me proof that a teacher from any country popped off at a school shooter protecting a lot of kids in a classroom I may jump on board.
 
Last edited:
The righr to bear arm is the law of this land
If you don't like that you are free to leave

Or change the laws like every other advanced democracy has done...
You really don't get it, do you? Perhaps I made a mistake in your case. I now think that your stupidity pre-empts your whining as the most annoying.

Again, the only thing keeping the bizarre interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is one Supreme Court justice...

One old, angry supreme court justice...

Then we change the laws, ban guns and everything is fine, really.

Because honestly, you haven't given me a good reason yet why the rest of us should let you have one.
 
The righr to bear arm is the law of this land
If you don't like that you are free to leave

Or change the laws like every other advanced democracy has done...

So take a shot at doing so if you're not all talk. Would be good for a laugh.

182385_313593462074900_858884928_n_zps101ca66e.jpg
 
Is someone suggesting we arm the union thug school teachers? Next it will be union longshoremen thugs then the union police thugs, where will it end? Besides I don't think my fifth grade teacher could even lift a gun, and even though she was a union thug she didn't like to hurt people.

301160_262847093835926_1346411084_n.jpg
 
Is someone suggesting we arm the union thug school teachers? Next it will be union longshoremen thugs then the union police thugs, where will it end? Besides I don't think my fifth grade teacher could even lift a gun, and even though she was a union thug she didn't like to hurt people.
Wow, these writers score high for dubious creative thinking and/or writing, even though it is all manipulative, devious and distracting material in which is created like this, and then it is next being found within an opportunistic situation in which they might find pefect for their specfic agenda or time, in which ends up taking away from the reality of the situation at hand, and then ultimately it takes away from the proper solutions in which is really what some want us to abandon when they do this sort of thing anyway.
 
Jim we are having a conversation why are you hurling insults? I haven't said anything negative about your views. I have clearly stated a question which I needed clarification so why the hurling of insults?

By the way we are a bigger country than Israel and Israel is at war with a neighboring state so using them as an example is moot.

No, it didn't "need clarification". We've been "clarifying" it for 120 pages or so. The fact that you either 1) didn't bother to read those pages before spouting off, 2) read them but didn't bother comprehending and internalizing the messages there, or 3) were too thick to understand what you read does not obligate anyone else to treat with any seriousness and respect you coming in and blankly saying, "So . . . what was your position again?"

Furthermore, I can't see what difference being a bigger country than Israel has to do with letting teachers who are permitted to carry do so, and I also don't see how Israel being at war makes them "moot" as an example. It doesn't really matter to me WHAT the motivations are of the crazed gunman attacking our children.

Let me spell it out for you. The reason why Israel is a horrible example is because the current state of Israel is about protection of its citizens, from inside and out.

Well, I can see where Americans wouldn't want any truck with protecting its citizens. What a silly idea! :eusa_whistle:

They are in constant danger of either being invaded, or infiltrated. We don't have that problem. Our concerns are the current wars, fiscal cliffs, and the internal strife we like to call "war on drugs."

You forgot being overrun with the various, garden-variety criminals the left so loves to coddle (or were you imagining that all crime in the United States is due to "the war on drugs"?) and occasionally being mowed down in the process of our daily lives by the occasional homicidal lunatic.

Pretty sure I'm still back at not caring what the motivation is behind the bullet aimed at my children.

The idea that teachers in Israel packing guns does nothing for the advancement of the proponents argument that teachers arming themselves as being a logical solution to school violence.

Thanks, but I actually understood what your idea was. MY point was that it's nonsensical bullshit, and I think I'm going to consider that my final answer.
 
The righr to bear arm is the law of this land
If you don't like that you are free to leave

Or change the laws like every other advanced democracy has done...

So take a shot at doing so if you're not all talk. Would be good for a laugh.

]

Ummm... yeah. Here's the thing. Even REpublicans are throwing the NRA under the bus right now... and Wayne LaPeirre frothing at the mouth on TV like Old Yeller didn't help his cause much.
 
No, it didn't "need clarification". We've been "clarifying" it for 120 pages or so. The fact that you either 1) didn't bother to read those pages before spouting off, 2) read them but didn't bother comprehending and internalizing the messages there, or 3) were too thick to understand what you read does not obligate anyone else to treat with any seriousness and respect you coming in and blankly saying, "So . . . what was your position again?"

Furthermore, I can't see what difference being a bigger country than Israel has to do with letting teachers who are permitted to carry do so, and I also don't see how Israel being at war makes them "moot" as an example. It doesn't really matter to me WHAT the motivations are of the crazed gunman attacking our children.

Let me spell it out for you. The reason why Israel is a horrible example is because the current state of Israel is about protection of its citizens, from inside and out.

Well, I can see where Americans wouldn't want any truck with protecting its citizens. What a silly idea! :eusa_whistle:

They are in constant danger of either being invaded, or infiltrated. We don't have that problem. Our concerns are the current wars, fiscal cliffs, and the internal strife we like to call "war on drugs."

You forgot being overrun with the various, garden-variety criminals the left so loves to coddle (or were you imagining that all crime in the United States is due to "the war on drugs"?) and occasionally being mowed down in the process of our daily lives by the occasional homicidal lunatic.

Pretty sure I'm still back at not caring what the motivation is behind the bullet aimed at my children.

The idea that teachers in Israel packing guns does nothing for the advancement of the proponents argument that teachers arming themselves as being a logical solution to school violence.

Thanks, but I actually understood what your idea was. MY point was that it's nonsensical bullshit, and I think I'm going to consider that my final answer.

As you pointed out, Israel isn't exactly unique among those of us who believe it is the duty of government to provide the common defense from enemies whether foreign or domestic. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that the Founders wrote that down. And further, they gave us the Second Amendment so that the citizens would always have the right to defend themselves from those intent on doing violence to them.

And we are not in danger of being infiltrated? Really? I wonder why our prisons are disproportionately populated with illegals who have committed crimes here? And don't forget that the 9/11 hijackers were all in the country legally as was the 'shoe bomber' and others who weren't as successful but who have nevertheless forced us to change our lifestyles forever.

And yes, it would seem to me that those teachers and administratiors who are entrusted with the minds and physical welfare of our children for many hours every week could be trusted with the means of defending them as well should they accept that responsibility.
 

Forum List

Back
Top