Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
You can have a form of Direct Democracy that isn't mob rule, this is Direct Representation this is via Referendum and also giving the peoples the right to Veto legislation that they feel doesn't and/or wouldn't be good for the population in general.
There are nearly infinite forms of government that fit under the umbrella of "democracy".
A "Constitutional Republic", as the US is, is one of them.
More to illustrate that the EU and those who support it are against Democracy.
This is indicating violence, a violent suppression of a peoples right to Democracy and self-determination. The French need to STFU with their very unpopular little Dictator Macron who now has the lowest approval ratings of any French President of The Fifth Republic.
It is for this reason that I support the Catalans and their desire for self-determination, I do not agree with the politics of Catalonia which is Socialist, but I support their fight because this is a fight against the EU Dictatorship.
View attachment 153133
- Snip -
View attachment 153134
The European Project is no nation states that all nations in the EU must be one European Super State where no nation has their own tax policy, social policy, health policy, court system and no Sovereignty. The EU one large Political Union, it should revert back to the EEC when it was only an Economic Trading Bloc.
Catalonia: French minister calls for stronger EU to SQUASH separatist movements
Well, I'm glad that you support the separatists (so do I), but that brings us full circle.
Go back and re-read the OP, in the context of our conversation.
You would find that a lot of people do support the Catalans. Americans wouldn't comprehend I don't think how those on the Right could be supporting the Catalans, but this situation transcends politics, as I say this is about supporting the right to self-determination and being against anyone who wishes to violently suppress it.
I will re read the OP okay yes.
If you support self-determination, how do you reconcile that with your support for Franco?
He overthrew an elected (self-determined) government, and installed himself as absolute ruler.
There are nearly infinite forms of government that fit under the umbrella of "democracy".
A "Constitutional Republic", as the US is, is one of them.
More to illustrate that the EU and those who support it are against Democracy.
This is indicating violence, a violent suppression of a peoples right to Democracy and self-determination. The French need to STFU with their very unpopular little Dictator Macron who now has the lowest approval ratings of any French President of The Fifth Republic.
It is for this reason that I support the Catalans and their desire for self-determination, I do not agree with the politics of Catalonia which is Socialist, but I support their fight because this is a fight against the EU Dictatorship.
View attachment 153133
- Snip -
View attachment 153134
The European Project is no nation states that all nations in the EU must be one European Super State where no nation has their own tax policy, social policy, health policy, court system and no Sovereignty. The EU one large Political Union, it should revert back to the EEC when it was only an Economic Trading Bloc.
Catalonia: French minister calls for stronger EU to SQUASH separatist movements
Well, I'm glad that you support the separatists (so do I), but that brings us full circle.
Go back and re-read the OP, in the context of our conversation.
You would find that a lot of people do support the Catalans. Americans wouldn't comprehend I don't think how those on the Right could be supporting the Catalans, but this situation transcends politics, as I say this is about supporting the right to self-determination and being against anyone who wishes to violently suppress it.
I will re read the OP okay yes.
If you support self-determination, how do you reconcile that with your support for Franco?
He overthrew an elected (self-determined) government, and installed himself as absolute ruler.
Well that was different because the Communists if not stopped would have taken over Spain, so that was to prevent Spain falling to Communism.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
Churchill, and FDR killed 10's of thousands of civilians in Dresden.
They killed 10's of thousands more from supporting Communists in Potsdam, and Yalta Conferences.
Churchill had controlled an India where 3 million starved to death.
FDR had his own camps where Japanese, and some Germans, and Italians were interned.
No way, Franco isn't as bad as these scumf*cks.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
Churchill, and FDR killed 10's of thousands of civilians in Dresden.
They killed 10's of thousands more from supporting Communists in Potsdam, and Yalta Conferences.
Churchill had controlled an India where 3 million starved to death.
FDR had his own camps where Japanese, and some Germans, and Italians were interned.
No way, Franco isn't as bad as these scumf*cks.
War is hell.
There's a difference between casualties of war, and casualties of political retribution and thought-crime.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
Churchill, and FDR killed 10's of thousands of civilians in Dresden.
They killed 10's of thousands more from supporting Communists in Potsdam, and Yalta Conferences.
Churchill had controlled an India where 3 million starved to death.
FDR had his own camps where Japanese, and some Germans, and Italians were interned.
No way, Franco isn't as bad as these scumf*cks.
War is hell.
There's a difference between casualties of war, and casualties of political retribution and thought-crime.
Dresden was not even a military target, but rather a refugee haven of Eastern German civilians fleeing the Soviets, that's why Dresden had so many civilians.
Obvious deliberate genocide massacre by firebombing by the Anglo-elite of the U.S, and England.
No, nothing Franco did compares to that.
You could argue that the bombing of Dresden was a war crime.
But so was the Blitz, and twice as many British civilians died in London as a result of German bombs than Germany civilians in Dresden.
You could argue that the bombing of Dresden was a war crime.
But so was the Blitz, and twice as many British civilians died in London as a result of German bombs than Germany civilians in Dresden.
What about dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there was no need to do that either but Truman did it, Japan was already in discussions to surrender when the Atomic Bombs were dropped murdering innocent peoples.
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
Churchill, and FDR killed 10's of thousands of civilians in Dresden.
They killed 10's of thousands more from supporting Communists in Potsdam, and Yalta Conferences.
Churchill had controlled an India where 3 million starved to death.
FDR had his own camps where Japanese, and some Germans, and Italians were interned.
No way, Franco isn't as bad as these scumf*cks.
War is hell.
There's a difference between casualties of war, and casualties of political retribution and thought-crime.
Dresden was not even a military target, but rather a refugee haven of Eastern German civilians fleeing the Soviets, that's why Dresden had so many civilians.
Obvious deliberate genocide massacre by firebombing by the Anglo-elite of the U.S, and England.
No, nothing Franco did compares to that.
Franco killed 400,000 of his own citizens for daring to disagree with him.
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
Churchill, and FDR killed 10's of thousands of civilians in Dresden.
They killed 10's of thousands more from supporting Communists in Potsdam, and Yalta Conferences.
Churchill had controlled an India where 3 million starved to death.
FDR had his own camps where Japanese, and some Germans, and Italians were interned.
No way, Franco isn't as bad as these scumf*cks.
War is hell.
There's a difference between casualties of war, and casualties of political retribution and thought-crime.
Dresden was not even a military target, but rather a refugee haven of Eastern German civilians fleeing the Soviets, that's why Dresden had so many civilians.
Obvious deliberate genocide massacre by firebombing by the Anglo-elite of the U.S, and England.
No, nothing Franco did compares to that.
Franco killed 400,000 of his own citizens for daring to disagree with him.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
They knew about Stalin and his gulags though, gulags that pre-dated the Second War also and they were silent and then post Second War they agreed to give the whole of Eastern Europe to the Communists which hundreds of millions of people suffered and many many also died during nearly 50 years.
FDR fully supported the Communist Regime of Stalin from when FDR became American President, the President's before FDR did not recognise the Communist Soviet Union and throughout the 1930s did all he could to help the Stalin Regime.
View attachment 153137
Milestones: 1921–1936 - Office of the Historian
You could argue that the bombing of Dresden was a war crime.
But so was the Blitz, and twice as many British civilians died in London as a result of German bombs than Germany civilians in Dresden.
What about dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there was no need to do that either but Truman did it, Japan was already in discussions to surrender when the Atomic Bombs were dropped murdering innocent peoples.
We dropped Atomic Bombs on Japan to show Stalin that we had them.
We knew what the new world order was going to be, from that point on (at least for the next 50 or so years) - and we were making a show of it.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
Churchill, and FDR killed 10's of thousands of civilians in Dresden.
They killed 10's of thousands more from supporting Communists in Potsdam, and Yalta Conferences.
Churchill had controlled an India where 3 million starved to death.
FDR had his own camps where Japanese, and some Germans, and Italians were interned.
No way, Franco isn't as bad as these scumf*cks.
War is hell.
There's a difference between casualties of war, and casualties of political retribution and thought-crime.
Dresden was not even a military target, but rather a refugee haven of Eastern German civilians fleeing the Soviets, that's why Dresden had so many civilians.
Obvious deliberate genocide massacre by firebombing by the Anglo-elite of the U.S, and England.
No, nothing Franco did compares to that.
Franco killed 400,000 of his own citizens for daring to disagree with him.
Some death toll FIGURES for the Dresden Firebombing have been sourced that high.
Churchill, and FDR killed 10's of thousands of civilians in Dresden.
They killed 10's of thousands more from supporting Communists in Potsdam, and Yalta Conferences.
Churchill had controlled an India where 3 million starved to death.
FDR had his own camps where Japanese, and some Germans, and Italians were interned.
No way, Franco isn't as bad as these scumf*cks.
War is hell.
There's a difference between casualties of war, and casualties of political retribution and thought-crime.
Dresden was not even a military target, but rather a refugee haven of Eastern German civilians fleeing the Soviets, that's why Dresden had so many civilians.
Obvious deliberate genocide massacre by firebombing by the Anglo-elite of the U.S, and England.
No, nothing Franco did compares to that.
Franco killed 400,000 of his own citizens for daring to disagree with him.
Some death toll FIGURES for the Dresden Firebombing have been sourced that high.
Only those that have a particular agenda.
Realistic estimates, based on Dresen records, indicate around 25,000 to 30,000 fatalities in Dresden.
You could argue that the bombing of Dresden was a war crime.
But so was the Blitz, and twice as many British civilians died in London as a result of German bombs than Germany civilians in Dresden.
What about dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there was no need to do that either but Truman did it, Japan was already in discussions to surrender when the Atomic Bombs were dropped murdering innocent peoples.
We dropped Atomic Bombs on Japan to show Stalin that we had them.
We knew what the new world order was going to be, from that point on (at least for the next 50 or so years) - and we were making a show of it.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
They knew about Stalin and his gulags though, gulags that pre-dated the Second War also and they were silent and then post Second War they agreed to give the whole of Eastern Europe to the Communists which hundreds of millions of people suffered and many many also died during nearly 50 years.
FDR fully supported the Communist Regime of Stalin from when FDR became American President, the President's before FDR did not recognise the Communist Soviet Union and throughout the 1930s did all he could to help the Stalin Regime.
View attachment 153137
Milestones: 1921–1936 - Office of the Historian
I don't quite get why the Polish Operation of the NKVD 1937 - 1938 didn't qualify for British aid to Poland, when Soviets butchered over 100,000 ethnic Poles just before WW2.
Are you saying that you were a Franco supporter?
What's so bad about being a Franco supporter?
Churchill, FDR, and Stalin were much more brutal than Franco.
Besides, Franco in the Spanish Miracle achieved Europe's fastest economic growth in the 20th century.
No, neither Churchill nor FDR had their political opponents sent to concentration camps and executed for the crime of daring to disagree with them.
