Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

Already have... the OP here...

So, ice age is confined to a narrow bit of land.

What about 2 million years ago when my home in the Sierras was below a mile thick slab of ice.

What is that period called?

Super duper ice age?
 
So, ice age is confined to a narrow bit of land.

What about 2 million years ago when my home in the Sierras was below a mile thick slab of ice.

What is that period called?

Super duper ice age?


You have a perverted way of defining mile thick ice. The Himalayas have a lot of ice too. That is mountain ice. Africa has that on Killimanjaro.

What you parrot is called Milankovich cycles, on USMB called McBullshit and completely refuted on both poles...






WHEN YOU CAN REFUTE ONE WORD OF ANY OF THAT, LET US KNOW...
 
ice age is confined to a narrow bit of land


is par for the level of dishonesty of the intellectually inferior Zionist Fascist Traitor....


This is what the link says...


So what causes an ICE AGE?


Land moving near the poles. When land gets to within - roughly- 600 miles of a pole, as Greenland just did, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and then it starts to stack. Stack for a million or 2 years = Greenland. Stack for 40+ million years = Antarctica. Ice ages like North American Ice Age end when the land moves outside of the 600 miles to a pole barrier.



The original definition of ICE AGE which is still used today was formed without any knowledge that land moves via the tectonic plates. It was thought that glaciation of South America's southern tip was the result of ice from Antarctica, in its current position, growing out over ocean and freezing up southern South America "during an ice age". Since 2010 that is now recorded, cough cough, as a rapid series of Dennis Quaid style ice ages coming and going. Neither of those are correct. As this map with sea level depth exposed shows, South America on the southern tip glaciated because 20 million or so years ago it was still attached to Antarctica, but isn't anymore and that's why it melted to just mountains today...


R.db19eb4ea7b7195ba0580ba3818ecaec



Antarctica itself has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, because 70 million years ago it was not on the South Pole (and not covered with 2+ mile thick ice age glacier), but halfway to South Africa where it originated.




Rule 1 = Ice Age Glacier does not grow out over ocean, it breaks off - see Antarctica and Greenland, Titanic

Rule 2 = Ice Ages are Continent Specific Events because of Rule 1
 
You have a perverted way of defining mile thick ice. The Himalayas have a lot of ice too. That is mountain ice. Africa has that on Killimanjaro.

What you parrot is called Milankovich cycles, on USMB called McBullshit and completely refuted on both poles...






WHEN YOU CAN REFUTE ONE WORD OF ANY OF THAT, LET US KNOW...
There is ample proof of the thickness of the ice slab that sat on the Sierra Nevada mountains. They are still engaged in isostatic rebound from the weight.

Furthermore we have the extensive U shaped valleys all over the region. Those are well proven evidence of gladiator.

So, once again, what was the cause of that?
 
is par for the level of dishonesty of the intellectually inferior Zionist Fascist Traitor....


This is what the link says...


So what causes an ICE AGE?


Land moving near the poles. When land gets to within - roughly- 600 miles of a pole, as Greenland just did, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and then it starts to stack. Stack for a million or 2 years = Greenland. Stack for 40+ million years = Antarctica. Ice ages like North American Ice Age end when the land moves outside of the 600 miles to a pole barrier.



The original definition of ICE AGE which is still used today was formed without any knowledge that land moves via the tectonic plates. It was thought that glaciation of South America's southern tip was the result of ice from Antarctica, in its current position, growing out over ocean and freezing up southern South America "during an ice age". Since 2010 that is now recorded, cough cough, as a rapid series of Dennis Quaid style ice ages coming and going. Neither of those are correct. As this map with sea level depth exposed shows, South America on the southern tip glaciated because 20 million or so years ago it was still attached to Antarctica, but isn't anymore and that's why it melted to just mountains today...


R.db19eb4ea7b7195ba0580ba3818ecaec



Antarctica itself has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, because 70 million years ago it was not on the South Pole (and not covered with 2+ mile thick ice age glacier), but halfway to South Africa where it originated.




Rule 1 = Ice Age Glacier does not grow out over ocean, it breaks off - see Antarctica and Greenland, Titanic

Rule 2 = Ice Ages are Continent Specific Events because of Rule 1
Or…… ocean current creates isolation in a cold area
 
There is ample proof of the thickness of the ice slab that sat on the Sierra Nevada mountains. They are still engaged in isostatic rebound from the weight.

Furthermore we have the extensive U shaped valleys all over the region. Those are well proven evidence of gladiator.

So, once again, what was the cause of that?


Mountains have ice all over the planet.



Earth ice content

Land within 600 miles of a pole and hence in ICE AGE

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%
Ellesmere Island 0.3%


the other 2.7% is sea ice and mountain tops.
 
Or…… ocean current creates isolation in a cold area


Evidence?

What evidence do you have that ocean currents remain constant for more than a decade??

ZERO
ZIP
NADA
NONE

but that will never stop your BEAKED BIRDBRAIN from PARROTING BULLSHIT from YOUTUBE
 
Mountains have ice all over the planet.



Earth ice content

Land within 600 miles of a pole and hence in ICE AGE

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%
Ellesmere Island 0.3%


the other 2.7% is sea ice and mountain tops.
That's not what I asked
 
That's not what I asked


Yeah it is. You just do not like it.

North American Ice Age, 50 million to 10k years ago, made North America a lot colder than today. So, yeah, there was more mountain ice. As North America moved SW and away from the North Pole, it got warmer, the 5+ million cubic miles of ice called Laurentide Ice Sheet melted, and the mountain ice shrank with that.

DUH....
 
Screeches the lying troll.

Or should I say

TROLL!

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
NO NO.
My post had information Exposing a 10,000 times repeated lie of ding.
Your post has none.

Even tho you are an 8 year poster and DEMOTED Mod, you still don't know the rules.

`
`
 
There is ample proof of the thickness of the ice slab that sat on the Sierra Nevada mountains. They are still engaged in isostatic rebound from the weight.
Furthermore we have the extensive U shaped valleys all over the region. Those are well proven evidence of gladiator.

So, once again, what was the cause of that?
You have proof of an ancient tectonic "Gladiator" you DEMENTED POS?

`
 
Our climate

Just ask the people of Asheville. Ask people from AZ how many more 100+ degree days.

And on and on…
Hey, did you know that AZ is a desert region? Guess what happens in deserts? it gets hot. So the climate hasn't changed as you just pointed out. Hot is hot. There's no difference between five over 100 days and 10 over 100 days because you have fking no clue how many times in the history of that area had over 10 100 degree days. Feel free to post that data for us? I know you won't because you can't, you're merely turretting nonsense as always.
 
Take it up with ChatGPT:

Oil spills can have long-term effects on the environment, human health, and local economies:

  • Health effects
    Oil spills can cause long-term health effects in humans, including increased risk of cancer, reproductive problems, decreased immunity, low platelet counts, low hemoglobin levels, breathing problems, liver problems, and heart issues.

  • Ecological effects
    Oil spills can have long-term ecological effects, including:
    • Deep ocean: Oiling of deep ocean corals, failed recruitment of oysters, and damage to coastal wetlands


    • Offshore: Oiling of plankton, invertebrates, fish, sea turtles, sea birds, and marine mammals


    • Coastal habitats: Sand beach habitat and submersed aquatic vegetation impacts
  • Cultural and archaeological resources
    Oil spills can damage cultural and archaeological resources in national parks, such as historical monuments, cultural art and artifacts, forts, and lighthouses
Oil can remain in the environment long after a spill, and has been detected in sediment 30 years after a spill.
Oil leaks continuously from undersea deposits on the ocean floor. These leaks are harmless because these are several types of bacteria that subsist on oil and excrete a harmless substance. Even oil spills like Deep Water Horizon are gobbled up by hungry bacteria.
 

Forum List

Back
Top