Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does one surpress a vote simply by knowing who is registered? By the way NUMBNUTS they are already registered in the State. nAlways have been so why could fed knowledge lead to what State knowledge has not?A firearms registry serves one purpose, to locate all the lawful weapons in the Country for a seizure at a later date.
You freaks believe that but don't believe these strict ID LAWS are designed to suppress votes!??
What planet are you on?
When did fishing become free in GOP states? I've never seen a shortage of fishing license requirements in all 50 states, unless it is private property..Hell try to catch a fish to feed yourself if you are poor and living in a Dem controlled state, you have to prove you are a citizen plus then pay them an outrageous fee for the privilege.
That doesn't even come close to responding to the QUESTION the OP asks in the title:Damn, I bet that bullshit sounded a lot better in your head. No one is taking about a national voter registry, at best the information requested would provide a snapshot of States voter registries. Also no one is talking about making the information public, although most of it already is.
No one said there is...NOW ANY WAY, just as there is no national gun registry NOW, dimwit! It was a hypothetical question (since that word has 12 letters you'll need someone with an education to explain that concept to you).No one is taking about a national voter registry....
You too fucking broke to pay attention to the news. Kobach, before the Commission has even been formed with its 15 appointees, is unilaterally deciding for himself what is going to be formulated and what is to be done with the information received. So how the fuck do YOU know what is being done by that loose cannon from Kansas rolling around the deck, Tex? And what is Pence doing about Kobach's conduct? Stick to the subject of the fucking OP you ignorant fuck!Also no one is talking about making the information public....
How does one surpress a vote simply by knowing who is registered? By the way NUMBNUTS they are already registered in the State. nAlways have been so why could fed knowledge lead to what State knowledge has not?
Damn, I bet that bullshit sounded a lot better in your head. No one is taking about a national voter registry, at best the information requested would provide a snapshot of States voter registries. Also no one is talking about making the information public, although most of it already is.
That doesn't even come close to responding to the QUESTION the OP asks in the title:Damn, I bet that bullshit sounded a lot better in your head. No one is taking about a national voter registry, at best the information requested would provide a snapshot of States voter registries. Also no one is talking about making the information public, although most of it already is.
Any Privacy Difference Between Nat. Voter Registry & Nat. Gun Registry?
The question regarded a PRIVACY ISSUE COMPARISON between two possible types of privacy invasive initiatives! Not a single swinging Richard among you far right wing nationalists have been willing to even come close to responding to that!
No one said there is...NOW ANY WAY, just as there is no national gun registry NOW, dimwit! It was a hypothetical question (since that word has 12 letters you'll need someone with an education to explain that concept to you).No one is taking about a national voter registry....
You too fucking broke to pay attention to the news. Kobach, before the Commission has even been formed with its 15 appointees, is unilaterally deciding for himself what is going to be formulated and what is to be done with the information received. So how the fuck do YOU know what is being done by that loose cannon from Kansas rolling around the deck, Tex? And what is Pence doing about Kobach's conduct? Stick to the subject of the fucking OP you ignorant fuck!Also no one is talking about making the information public....
Now you run along and have a nice day on your rocking horse, Sparkles, and do try to stay on the topic of the OP, little one!
You gun freaks are so intellectually dishonest. None of you took up my apples to apples challenge on gun nut vs gun control states .
Because it isn't an apples to apples challenge......the all white Massechuesetts to Arizona which is on the border with the Narco state of Mexico where the drug cartels do their business...nice try asswipe.
Fine . You choose the states .
Then there is no government right to know if you voted.there is no government right to know if you own a gun....
Right?
Yes...there is......so that you don't vote more than once. they can't know how you voted, just that you voted once, where you live, and no where else....
Isn't that a state government right, and not a right of the federal government?
10th amendment.
Damn, I bet that bullshit sounded a lot better in your head. No one is taking about a national voter registry, at best the information requested would provide a snapshot of States voter registries. Also no one is talking about making the information public, although most of it already is.
Read the Kobach letter
Illinois to delay Trump commission voter data request until August
"Please be aware that any documents that are submitted to the full commission will also be made available to the public."
You gun freaks are so intellectually dishonest. None of you took up my apples to apples challenge on gun nut vs gun control states .
I gave you a map of murder in every county in the U.S........and those counties with the most murder have the most gun control......that is as apples to apples as you can get, and it isn't cherry picking the way you want to do...
Comparing hard # of NYC with like 9 million people to people killed in Little Rock with 500,000 population is dishonest .
You gun freaks are so intellectually dishonest. None of you took up my apples to apples challenge on gun nut vs gun control states .
I gave you a map of murder in every county in the U.S........and those counties with the most murder have the most gun control......that is as apples to apples as you can get, and it isn't cherry picking the way you want to do...
Comparing hard # of NYC with like 9 million people to people killed in Little Rock with 500,000 population is dishonest .
The Presidential Election is a national election. And the federal government has law enforcement powers that include election violations.
You get to vote, once, where you live. The only way to check this is to know where you live. They can't know who you voted for, but they can check where you are registered, and if you have registered in multiple locations...which is against federal election laws.
Na, it is absolutely unconstitutional because it's none of the fucking government business… Quit falling down the the well.Quit falling down the well, any type of firearm registry is unconstitutional.I believe a gun registry would cut down on straw purchases that lead to guns ending up in the hands of criminals . This is a major probleM in the us .
National vote registry ? I don't see how this would really help wh voter fraud (which is not a big issue unlike guns). Elections are virtually all local . What would the nat vote registry do exactly ?
More frivolous gun laws have proven to be absolutely inept in violent crime prevention....
No it's not unconstitutional. It doesn't interfere with anyone's right to bear arms .
It's the gun nuts states lack of laws that pollute everyone else's attempts .
Na, it is absolutely unconstitutional because it's none of the fucking government business… Quit falling down the the well.Quit falling down the well, any type of firearm registry is unconstitutional.I believe a gun registry would cut down on straw purchases that lead to guns ending up in the hands of criminals . This is a major probleM in the us .
National vote registry ? I don't see how this would really help wh voter fraud (which is not a big issue unlike guns). Elections are virtually all local . What would the nat vote registry do exactly ?
More frivolous gun laws have proven to be absolutely inept in violent crime prevention....
No it's not unconstitutional. It doesn't interfere with anyone's right to bear arms .
It's the gun nuts states lack of laws that pollute everyone else's attempts .
Then you'll agree our voter information should stay with the secretaries of state where it has been since the signing of the Constitution.
Trump is out of line and a paranoid freak.
See how easy that was?
The states sell this information to political parties......so there isn't a problem......you are dumb and don't know what you are talking about...see how easy that was...
If that's what you wish to contrive in your distorted fucking world of lies and deceit, you two-faced lying motherfucker, roll on with it, Tex! Next you'll be proclaiming what a good friend Putin and Russia are now that that fat-assed Orange piece of shit has tamed them both to his will! Always carry a good supply of Vaseline with ya and stay well lubricated for your friends, dipstick!So what you're saying is reality has no place in the discussion, you just expect people to address two privacy invasive initiatives you just dreamed up.
As I said earlier no one is trying to establish a national voter registry and just for your information a national gun registry would violate existing federal law. That's reality.
As far as I know this forum is for discussing real politics, not imaginary crap dreamed up by a butt hurt regressive.
Na, it is absolutely unconstitutional because it's none of the fucking government business… Quit falling down the the well.Quit falling down the well, any type of firearm registry is unconstitutional.I believe a gun registry would cut down on straw purchases that lead to guns ending up in the hands of criminals . This is a major probleM in the us .
National vote registry ? I don't see how this would really help wh voter fraud (which is not a big issue unlike guns). Elections are virtually all local . What would the nat vote registry do exactly ?
More frivolous gun laws have proven to be absolutely inept in violent crime prevention....
No it's not unconstitutional. It doesn't interfere with anyone's right to bear arms .
It's the gun nuts states lack of laws that pollute everyone else's attempts .
Then you'll agree our voter information should stay with the secretaries of state where it has been since the signing of the Constitution.
Trump is out of line and a paranoid freak.
See how easy that was?
If that's what you wish to contrive in your distorted fucking world of lies and deceit, you two-faced lying motherfucker, roll on with it, Tex! Next you'll be proclaiming what a good friend Putin and Russia are now that that fat-assed Orange piece of shit has tamed them both to his will! Always carry a good supply of Vaseline with ya and stay well lubricated for your friends, dipstick!So what you're saying is reality has no place in the discussion, you just expect people to address two privacy invasive initiatives you just dreamed up.
As I said earlier no one is trying to establish a national voter registry and just for your information a national gun registry would violate existing federal law. That's reality.
As far as I know this forum is for discussing real politics, not imaginary crap dreamed up by a butt hurt regressive.
Voting is a states issue... the Federal government cannot be trustedNa, it is absolutely unconstitutional because it's none of the fucking government business… Quit falling down the the well.Quit falling down the well, any type of firearm registry is unconstitutional.I believe a gun registry would cut down on straw purchases that lead to guns ending up in the hands of criminals . This is a major probleM in the us .
National vote registry ? I don't see how this would really help wh voter fraud (which is not a big issue unlike guns). Elections are virtually all local . What would the nat vote registry do exactly ?
More frivolous gun laws have proven to be absolutely inept in violent crime prevention....
No it's not unconstitutional. It doesn't interfere with anyone's right to bear arms .
It's the gun nuts states lack of laws that pollute everyone else's attempts .
Then you'll agree our voter information should stay with the secretaries of state where it has been since the signing of the Constitution.
Trump is out of line and a paranoid freak.
See how easy that was?
