Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure it is. I even expanded on it for the simple minded.Liar. " act like a president " IS NOT an answer.How many different ways are your you two bozos going to ask me the same question? I've already posted the answer.^ this is why Obama did nothing. He didn't fucking care.
What should Obama have done?
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Kim chi has been threatening nuclear war for months now. Trump is acting on those threats like he should. If jug head had done his job, none of this would likely be happening.Lil Mikey wanted Obama to " act like a president."
You mean like Trump?
Watch 5 hours of TV per day, tweet out daily lies and make a total fool of himself..
Obama kept us safe.
Trump is already threatening nuclear war.
I bet you'd love that..
Total complete horse crap!From my link:
For the continuing education of LilMikey.
At a moment of nuclear brinksmanship like this, any citizen of the United States wants a few things from a leader. You want someone you can trust to tell the truth, and who foreign leaders view as credible, so that threats and statements alike are taken seriously. You want someone who is known to be able to carefully sift through a lot of evidence and assess upsides from downsides. You want someone who has a team of expert advisers whose judgment he trusts and takes seriously. And you want someone who is able to take bad news.
The problem is that Trump has none of these characteristics. He has shown himself to be prolifically dishonest. The president has lied to the public about matters great and small, from the petty (the size of his inauguration crowd) to the serious (accusations of wiretapping, his own position on major matters) to the absurd (outright denying things he said publicly). As a result, Americans are in no position to trust the things he might tell them in a crisis, whether those remarks are delivered from behind the Resolute desk or via tweet.
I was very clear with what I said. The casualties from shock and awe were not what the Bush administration reported. More dead women and children, very few hits on the prescribed targets.Same speech writer?
Shock and awe was a disastrous mistake and killed many innocent men women and children.
Do we have another republican president without regard for human life?
Are you referring to the 3,000 Iraqi civilians killed during the "Shock & Awe" or the 300,000 bodies of those who opposed Saddam Hussein, who were found in the mass graves?
If you want to see "Shock & Awe", look up the WW2 Dresden bombings. We won that war too.
From my link:
For the continuing education of LilMikey.
At a moment of nuclear brinksmanship like this, any citizen of the United States wants a few things from a leader. You want someone you can trust to tell the truth, and who foreign leaders view as credible, so that threats and statements alike are taken seriously. You want someone who is known to be able to carefully sift through a lot of evidence and assess upsides from downsides. You want someone who has a team of expert advisers whose judgment he trusts and takes seriously. And you want someone who is able to take bad news.
The problem is that Trump has none of these characteristics. He has shown himself to be prolifically dishonest. The president has lied to the public about matters great and small, from the petty (the size of his inauguration crowd) to the serious (accusations of wiretapping, his own position on major matters) to the absurd (outright denying things he said publicly). As a result, Americans are in no position to trust the things he might tell them in a crisis, whether those remarks are delivered from behind the Resolute desk or via tweet.
According to Wiki where anyone can change the content at a moment's notice?I was very clear with what I said. The casualties from shock and awe were not what the Bush administration reported. More dead women and children, very few hits on the prescribed targets.Same speech writer?
Shock and awe was a disastrous mistake and killed many innocent men women and children.
Do we have another republican president without regard for human life?
Are you referring to the 3,000 Iraqi civilians killed during the "Shock & Awe" or the 300,000 bodies of those who opposed Saddam Hussein, who were found in the mass graves?
If you want to see "Shock & Awe", look up the WW2 Dresden bombings. We won that war too.
"Very few hits on the prescribed targets"? Would you like to ask me how I know you're a liar?
"National Geographic researcher Bijal Trivedi stated, "Civilian casualties did occur, but the strikes, for the most part, were surgical."
"According to some analysts, the military's attack was perhaps too precise."
Shock and awe - Wikipedia
Notice when the troll doesn't like the answer he attacks the messenger. Every time.According to Wiki where anyone can change the content at a moment's notice?I was very clear with what I said. The casualties from shock and awe were not what the Bush administration reported. More dead women and children, very few hits on the prescribed targets.Same speech writer?
Shock and awe was a disastrous mistake and killed many innocent men women and children.
Do we have another republican president without regard for human life?
Are you referring to the 3,000 Iraqi civilians killed during the "Shock & Awe" or the 300,000 bodies of those who opposed Saddam Hussein, who were found in the mass graves?
If you want to see "Shock & Awe", look up the WW2 Dresden bombings. We won that war too.
"Very few hits on the prescribed targets"? Would you like to ask me how I know you're a liar?
"National Geographic researcher Bijal Trivedi stated, "Civilian casualties did occur, but the strikes, for the most part, were surgical."
"According to some analysts, the military's attack was perhaps too precise."
Shock and awe - Wikipedia
You're an unintentional comedian.
The Atlantic told it exactly the way it is and you can't handle the truth.From my link:
For the continuing education of LilMikey.
At a moment of nuclear brinksmanship like this, any citizen of the United States wants a few things from a leader. You want someone you can trust to tell the truth, and who foreign leaders view as credible, so that threats and statements alike are taken seriously. You want someone who is known to be able to carefully sift through a lot of evidence and assess upsides from downsides. You want someone who has a team of expert advisers whose judgment he trusts and takes seriously. And you want someone who is able to take bad news.
The problem is that Trump has none of these characteristics. He has shown himself to be prolifically dishonest. The president has lied to the public about matters great and small, from the petty (the size of his inauguration crowd) to the serious (accusations of wiretapping, his own position on major matters) to the absurd (outright denying things he said publicly). As a result, Americans are in no position to trust the things he might tell them in a crisis, whether those remarks are delivered from behind the Resolute desk or via tweet.
The problem is, you're a liberal and everything is filtered through liberalism.
Yet another thing lil Mikey doesn't know. Anyone can change the content of wiki. Admit it. You didn't know that. LmaoNotice when the troll doesn't like the answer he attacks the messenger. Every time.According to Wiki where anyone can change the content at a moment's notice?I was very clear with what I said. The casualties from shock and awe were not what the Bush administration reported. More dead women and children, very few hits on the prescribed targets.Same speech writer?
Shock and awe was a disastrous mistake and killed many innocent men women and children.
Do we have another republican president without regard for human life?
Are you referring to the 3,000 Iraqi civilians killed during the "Shock & Awe" or the 300,000 bodies of those who opposed Saddam Hussein, who were found in the mass graves?
If you want to see "Shock & Awe", look up the WW2 Dresden bombings. We won that war too.
"Very few hits on the prescribed targets"? Would you like to ask me how I know you're a liar?
"National Geographic researcher Bijal Trivedi stated, "Civilian casualties did occur, but the strikes, for the most part, were surgical."
"According to some analysts, the military's attack was perhaps too precise."
Shock and awe - Wikipedia
You're an unintentional comedian.
Yeah, i always wondered what those "needs certifications" and like things were. I never once thought someone could actually change the content like THEY WERE ASKING USERS TO DO!Yet another thing lil Mikey doesn't know. Anyone can change the content of wiki. Admit it. You didn't know that. LmaoNotice when the troll doesn't like the answer he attacks the messenger. Every time.According to Wiki where anyone can change the content at a moment's notice?I was very clear with what I said. The casualties from shock and awe were not what the Bush administration reported. More dead women and children, very few hits on the prescribed targets.Are you referring to the 3,000 Iraqi civilians killed during the "Shock & Awe" or the 300,000 bodies of those who opposed Saddam Hussein, who were found in the mass graves?
If you want to see "Shock & Awe", look up the WW2 Dresden bombings. We won that war too.
"Very few hits on the prescribed targets"? Would you like to ask me how I know you're a liar?
"National Geographic researcher Bijal Trivedi stated, "Civilian casualties did occur, but the strikes, for the most part, were surgical."
"According to some analysts, the military's attack was perhaps too precise."
Shock and awe - Wikipedia
You're an unintentional comedian.
Total complete horse crap!No truer words were ever spoken.
At a moment of nuclear brinksmanship like this, any citizen of the United States wants a few things from a leader. You want someone you can trust to tell the truth, and who foreign leaders view as credible, so that threats and statements alike are taken seriously. You want someone who is known to be able to carefully sift through a lot of evidence and assess upsides from downsides. You want someone who has a team of expert advisers whose judgment he trusts and takes seriously. And you want someone who is able to take bad news.
The problem is that Trump has none of these characteristics. He has shown himself to be prolifically dishonest. The president has lied to the public about matters great and small, from the petty (the size of his inauguration crowd) to the serious (accusations of wiretapping, his own position on major matters) to the absurd (outright denying things he said publicly). As a result, Americans are in no position to trust the things he might tell them in a crisis, whether those remarks are delivered from behind the Resolute desk or via tweet.
Same speech writer?
Shock and awe was a disastrous mistake and killed many innocent men women and children.
Do we have another republican president without regard for human life?
No, Trump has great regard for American life.Same speech writer?
Shock and awe was a disastrous mistake and killed many innocent men women and children.
Do we have another republican president without regard for human life?
The Atlantic told it exactly the way it is and you can't handle the truth.From my link:
For the continuing education of LilMikey.
At a moment of nuclear brinksmanship like this, any citizen of the United States wants a few things from a leader. You want someone you can trust to tell the truth, and who foreign leaders view as credible, so that threats and statements alike are taken seriously. You want someone who is known to be able to carefully sift through a lot of evidence and assess upsides from downsides. You want someone who has a team of expert advisers whose judgment he trusts and takes seriously. And you want someone who is able to take bad news.
The problem is that Trump has none of these characteristics. He has shown himself to be prolifically dishonest. The president has lied to the public about matters great and small, from the petty (the size of his inauguration crowd) to the serious (accusations of wiretapping, his own position on major matters) to the absurd (outright denying things he said publicly). As a result, Americans are in no position to trust the things he might tell them in a crisis, whether those remarks are delivered from behind the Resolute desk or via tweet.
The problem is, you're a liberal and everything is filtered through liberalism.
No one on earth believes a single thing Trump says. When he lies about EVERYTHING,, you'd have to be the biggest dope in the world to believe him now.
Translation: I believe every one of Trump's lies even when my better instincts tell me it's bullshit.The Atlantic told it exactly the way it is and you can't handle the truth.From my link:
For the continuing education of LilMikey.
At a moment of nuclear brinksmanship like this, any citizen of the United States wants a few things from a leader. You want someone you can trust to tell the truth, and who foreign leaders view as credible, so that threats and statements alike are taken seriously. You want someone who is known to be able to carefully sift through a lot of evidence and assess upsides from downsides. You want someone who has a team of expert advisers whose judgment he trusts and takes seriously. And you want someone who is able to take bad news.
The problem is that Trump has none of these characteristics. He has shown himself to be prolifically dishonest. The president has lied to the public about matters great and small, from the petty (the size of his inauguration crowd) to the serious (accusations of wiretapping, his own position on major matters) to the absurd (outright denying things he said publicly). As a result, Americans are in no position to trust the things he might tell them in a crisis, whether those remarks are delivered from behind the Resolute desk or via tweet.
The problem is, you're a liberal and everything is filtered through liberalism.
No one on earth believes a single thing Trump says. When he lies about EVERYTHING,, you'd have to be the biggest dope in the world to believe him now.
I can hardly blame you for your own lack of information. Your handlers only tell you what they want you to think.
Carry on.
This is the guy posting " Hillary is going to jail" sources in other threads.The Atlantic told it exactly the way it is and you can't handle the truth.From my link:
For the continuing education of LilMikey.
At a moment of nuclear brinksmanship like this, any citizen of the United States wants a few things from a leader. You want someone you can trust to tell the truth, and who foreign leaders view as credible, so that threats and statements alike are taken seriously. You want someone who is known to be able to carefully sift through a lot of evidence and assess upsides from downsides. You want someone who has a team of expert advisers whose judgment he trusts and takes seriously. And you want someone who is able to take bad news.
The problem is that Trump has none of these characteristics. He has shown himself to be prolifically dishonest. The president has lied to the public about matters great and small, from the petty (the size of his inauguration crowd) to the serious (accusations of wiretapping, his own position on major matters) to the absurd (outright denying things he said publicly). As a result, Americans are in no position to trust the things he might tell them in a crisis, whether those remarks are delivered from behind the Resolute desk or via tweet.
The problem is, you're a liberal and everything is filtered through liberalism.
No one on earth believes a single thing Trump says. When he lies about EVERYTHING,, you'd have to be the biggest dope in the world to believe him now.
I can hardly blame you for your own lack of information. Your handlers only tell you what they want you to think.
Carry on.
