Steve_McGarrett
Gold Member
- Jul 11, 2013
- 19,272
- 4,372
- 280
- Banned
- #61
They want exposure for a cabinet position.Why are they debating like they have a chance? Why don't they quit and save some money time and effort?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They want exposure for a cabinet position.Why are they debating like they have a chance? Why don't they quit and save some money time and effort?
i am pretty sure he wore an extra large mens boxers (just in case)Santorum looks like he needs to take a shit
hes 60, maybe a pencil?lindsy looks like he has a dick up his ass
racist much?It's Megyn!
What was the name of that black guy she was seeing before she got married?
Who cares who she dated or what race they are.racist much?It's Megyn!
What was the name of that black guy she was seeing before she got married?
What did I say that was racist?
Who cares who she dated or what race they are.racist much?It's Megyn!
What was the name of that black guy she was seeing before she got married?
What did I say that was racist?
Well, that was terrible. Truly terrible. From the premises of the questions—frequent variations on why are you not popular—to the decision to stage the debate in a nearly-audienceless stadium with random photographers wandering in and out of shots, people behind the moderators paying no particular attention to the debaters, and so on, it was clear throughout that Fox News was only holding the junior debate out of obligation, not because they they had any interest in it. I expect Fox will be hearing from angry staffers within 30 seconds of the debate's close.
There were no newsworthy moments, other than the moderators asking questions about whether American mosques needed more monitoring or what the candidates would do about "illegals." In general the moderation was what you'd expect from a Fox News B-team, with questions about brown people, litmus test questions for candidates perceived as not sufficiently anti-abortion, and why Hillary Clinton was Bad.
Winners: Anyone who had the sense to bow out of this thing before it started. Did no harm: Rick Perry did not overtly Screw Up. Bobby Jindal was competent; Carly Fiorina was fine, Rick Santorum was Rick Santorum. The big losers were Lindsey Graham, whose stumbling reading of his own opening statement sounded like a frightened child reciting his big lines for the school play—and it only went downhill from there, to the point where by the end it looked like he was about to burst into tears and run offstage—andJohn KasichGeorge Pataki, who was the biggest recipient of passive-aggressive moderator ire for wasting Fox News time that could have been used for other candidates.
Gilmore was there. Barely. That's about all you can say about them.
None of the candidates is going to get a boost from this, but there might be some fireworks from the candidates at how they were treated in this audience-less momentum-killer. Other than that we'll soon see what these staging screw-ups and open moderator hostility towards the lower-tier candidates means for the big-table debate.
As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
Santorums making a clown out of himself right now.
So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
Can yo face yourself in the mirror when you masturbate?Who cares, that blond is fucking hot, why are libtards always fugly?
So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
No, I'm insinuating that Perry is under investigation. Just like Walker has been (and there were convictions for his staff) as well as Chris Christie. But, if they were the GOP candidate, you'll vote for them.
So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
No, I'm insinuating that Perry is under investigation. Just like Walker has been (and there were convictions for his staff) as well as Chris Christie. But, if they were the GOP candidate, you'll vote for them.
So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
No, I'm insinuating that Perry is under investigation. Just like Walker has been (and there were convictions for his staff) as well as Chris Christie. But, if they were the GOP candidate, you'll vote for them.So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
No, I'm insinuating that Perry is under investigation. Just like Walker has been (and there were convictions for his staff) as well as Chris Christie. But, if they were the GOP candidate, you'll vote for them.
Sorry, I simply do not buy your moral equivalence argument. Hillary put our national security at risk and mishandled classified materials on her insecure "home brew" server. She used this private email system specifically for the purpose of usurping and avoiding government reporting laws. Then after she was caught red-handed, she destroyed e-mails, thousands of them. She believes she is above the law and that makes her unfit to serve as POTUS.
So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
No, I'm insinuating that Perry is under investigation. Just like Walker has been (and there were convictions for his staff) as well as Chris Christie. But, if they were the GOP candidate, you'll vote for them.So you are insinuating that Perry is being investigate by the FBI? Link it or STFU.As usual nothing but mindless venom and insults from the board liberals....
Sorry libturds, but .All 7 lower tier GOP candidates are better than Hillary and none are being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified materials....
What about Perry's mugshot? How did that happen?
No, I'm insinuating that Perry is under investigation. Just like Walker has been (and there were convictions for his staff) as well as Chris Christie. But, if they were the GOP candidate, you'll vote for them.
Sorry, I simply do not buy your moral equivalence argument. Hillary put our national security at risk and mishandled classified materials on her insecure "home brew" server. She used this private email system specifically for the purpose of usurping and avoiding government reporting laws. Then after she was caught red-handed, she destroyed e-mails, thousands of them. She believes she is above the law and that makes her unfit to serve as POTUS.
Oh, accusations become convictions. What was Colin Powell doing?
Btw, you forgot Benghazi and Vince Foster.