🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

AOC wants to ban bump stocks

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."
None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
What is the virtue of the bump stock? Why are they necessary?
Fact: There's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
 
I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."
None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
What is the virtue of the bump stock? Why are they necessary?
Fact: There's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
That’s not fact. That’s opinion.

There is no virtue to bump stocks. They are not defensible. What purpose do they serve?
 
I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."
None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
What is the virtue of the bump stock? Why are they necessary?
Fact: There's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
Yet they are banned.

Go pick your scabs
 
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."
None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
What is the virtue of the bump stock? Why are they necessary?
Fact: There's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
That’s not fact. That’s opinion.

There is no virtue to bump stocks. They are not defensible. What purpose do they serve?
Well they do give idiots another toy
 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter

How many of you liberals are with her on this???


Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!

What's the purpose of a bump stock?

Fire AT a large group of people quickly and not very accurately?

What is the purpose of having a car that will exceed the speed limit?

What's the purpose of having beer sold in case lots to a single individual?

What is the purpose of smoking cigarettes? BTW, did you know your odds, as a NONSMOKER, is that you stand a greater chance of dying from second hand smoke than by a firearm?

What's the purpose of owning a functional M1 Abrams?


Irrelevant. You cannot "bear" an Abrams tank, which according to the late Antonin Scalia, "bear" means to carry (see the Heller decision.) I can't carry a freaking tank. Nice try, but no cigar.

I'd counter you can't reasonably buy an automatic weapon you can "bear" either
 
the greatest threat to capitalism isnt socialism, its CAPITALISTS. As Schumpeter said, those who benefit most from capitalism will not stand up to defend it.
 
Fact: There's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
That’s not fact. That’s opinion.
No - its fact, proven by the fact no one has presented one.
Feel free to try.
Would you agree that a car and a gun are implements that serve distinct purposes? And would you agree that certain modifications to a car makes cars unnecessarily dangerous to public safety?
Predictably, nowhere in your post is a rational argument for banning bump stocks.
Hint: If you have a rational argument for said ban, you don't need to ask me any questions.
 
Funny, given how I just disproved it by providing examples.
 
Funny, given how I just disproved it by providing examples.

Eh, reasonably.

I guess I could link to websites trafficing Chinese women for football team owners also ;)
 

Forum List

Back
Top