🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

AOC wants to ban bump stocks

Yea...they "gimmicked" 600 victims in Vegas
How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
Probably quite a few less.

better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?

Just how stupid are you hacks? :lol:


he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

Bump stocks are not accurate.


Neither are machine guns.

not using a bump stock would have increased accuracy, meaning more kill shots.
 
Yea...they "gimmicked" 600 victims in Vegas
How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
Probably quite a few less.

better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?

Just how stupid are you hacks? :lol:


he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

Bump stocks are not accurate.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.

The idea is quantity.


Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?
 
We actually have parroting tards who think you won't hit a lot more people with a bump stock with a crowd like this:


big-crowd-at-concert-jpg-838x0-q67-crop-smart.jpg
 
It's always amazed me how the Tard Herd blindly and unthinkingly parrots what they are told to parrot by the special interests who are manipulating them.

"Duhhhh...we shouldn't ban bump stocks...because accuracy!"
 
How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
Probably quite a few less.

better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?

Just how stupid are you hacks? :lol:


he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

Bump stocks are not accurate.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.

The idea is quantity.


Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?


are you seriously trying to claim that accuracy wouldn't have claimed more lives?

targeting people as opposed to pulling the trigger and hoping to his someone?

How many shots missed the crowd completely?
 
Probably quite a few less.

better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?

Just how stupid are you hacks? :lol:


he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

Bump stocks are not accurate.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.

The idea is quantity.


Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?


are you seriously trying to claim that accuracy wouldn't have claimed more lives?

targeting people as opposed to pulling the trigger and hoping to his someone?

How many shots missed the crowd completely?
Wow.

Just...wow...
 
Sigh.
Assuming the shooter was committed to the particular shooting he perpetrated - from that room, into that crowd, firing at an area target rather than point target - and was unable to get a bump stock, what alternative(s) did he have?
 
better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?

Just how stupid are you hacks? :lol:


he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

Bump stocks are not accurate.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.

The idea is quantity.


Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?


are you seriously trying to claim that accuracy wouldn't have claimed more lives?

targeting people as opposed to pulling the trigger and hoping to his someone?

How many shots missed the crowd completely?
Wow.

Just...wow...
It's simply amazing isn't it. He could convince himself that orange is red.
 
I have two bump stocks. They are not that easy to use at all. I definitely wasted lots of money on cheap .223 trying to get the feel of it down. Now they sit in a closet somewhere collecting dust. No libs they don’t just turn your gun into a full automatic beast. There’s def skill and technique to them. Ban them if you must.. we can just use dental floss anyways
 
So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?

Just how stupid are you hacks? :lol:


he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

Bump stocks are not accurate.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.

The idea is quantity.


Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?


are you seriously trying to claim that accuracy wouldn't have claimed more lives?

targeting people as opposed to pulling the trigger and hoping to his someone?

How many shots missed the crowd completely?
Wow.

Just...wow...
It's simply amazing isn't it. He could convince himself that orange is red.
Accurracy isn't much of an issue if you have a mass target and the "aim" is to put as many rounds as possible into a center mass as quickly as possible. I'm not sure that he didn't switch to a rifle without a bump stock once the "herd" began dispersing.
 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."

But I realize you think Heller is "bad law."
 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."
None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."
None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.
What is the virtue of the bump stock? Why are they necessary?
 

Forum List

Back
Top