g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,215
- 68,917
- 2,605
See post 99, tard.Because...?Probably quite a few less.How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
See post 99, tard.Because...?Probably quite a few less.How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
Yea...they "gimmicked" 600 victims in Vegas
How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?Probably quite a few less.How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?Yea...they "gimmicked" 600 victims in Vegas
better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
Just how stupid are you hacks?![]()
Because...?Three.How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?Yea...they "gimmicked" 600 victims in Vegas
So, you have no meaningful answer - as per the norm.See post 99, tard.Because...?Probably quite a few less.How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?Probably quite a few less.How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?Yea...they "gimmicked" 600 victims in Vegas
better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
Just how stupid are you hacks?![]()
he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.
Bump stocks are not accurate.
Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?Probably quite a few less.How many of those people would not have not been shot if he was unable to get a bump stock?
better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
Just how stupid are you hacks?![]()
he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.
Bump stocks are not accurate.
The idea is quantity.
Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?
Wow.Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?Probably quite a few less.
better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
Just how stupid are you hacks?![]()
he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.
Bump stocks are not accurate.
The idea is quantity.
Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?
are you seriously trying to claim that accuracy wouldn't have claimed more lives?
targeting people as opposed to pulling the trigger and hoping to his someone?
How many shots missed the crowd completely?
I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
It's simply amazing isn't it. He could convince himself that orange is red.Wow.Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?better accuracy would have resulted in less people being shot?
Just how stupid are you hacks?![]()
he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.
Bump stocks are not accurate.
The idea is quantity.
Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?
are you seriously trying to claim that accuracy wouldn't have claimed more lives?
targeting people as opposed to pulling the trigger and hoping to his someone?
How many shots missed the crowd completely?
Just...wow...
I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
Accurracy isn't much of an issue if you have a mass target and the "aim" is to put as many rounds as possible into a center mass as quickly as possible. I'm not sure that he didn't switch to a rifle without a bump stock once the "herd" began dispersing.It's simply amazing isn't it. He could convince himself that orange is red.Wow.Accuracy doesn't matter when you are shooting at a CROWD! You can be blind as a bat and still hit bodies.So he used a bump stock because he wanted to kill LESS people?
Just how stupid are you hacks?![]()
he wanted to hit as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.
Bump stocks are not accurate.
The idea is quantity.
Seriously. I have to explain this!?!?
are you seriously trying to claim that accuracy wouldn't have claimed more lives?
targeting people as opposed to pulling the trigger and hoping to his someone?
How many shots missed the crowd completely?
Just...wow...
Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!
What is the virtue of the bump stock? Why are they necessary?None of this changes the fact there's no rational reason to ban bump stocks.Rational is why a bump stock is useful for a lawful purpose. Constitutional protections mean the govt cannot issue a blanket ban without legitimate reason to regulate, and probably a national ban on any class of firearm would be unconstitutional as "overbroad." There are mult reasons to need an semiauto rifile in rural areas, and not just for "fun."I'll take "The absence of a rational reason to do so" for $2000, Alex.I'm not for banning AR-15s or anything nationally, but I don't see what can be the rational or constitutional objection to nationally banning bump stocks.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter
How many of you liberals are with her on this???
Go AOC go AOC go go go AOC!!!