Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Name one. (yawn)Banning tax expenditures is a CONSERVATIVE idea
Name one. (yawnBanning tax expenditures is a CONSERVATIVE idea
I thought we already did that but then Reagan changed things then newt changed things then bush and Tom delay changed things then Jon boehner and Mitch McConnell changed things.To make it an even playing field sure!TRANSLATION: I want government to tilt the playing field toward ME and away from those eeeevil other guys.What we saw when bush took over investing in things the majority of americans want and benefit from like investment in science, public schools, infrastructure and NASA, we now invest less in all these things, gave the rich big tax breaks, and increased how much we spend on haloburton type defense contractors or kock brother type projects.Sorry dude,but I can no longer put up with the constant harping on infrastructure.
The rich love pork projects too if they go to their private companies.
(sigh)
Are you successful? How old are you? Well I want that system. The system even a dumb beeoch like you can be a winner.
What I don't want is you and bush rigging the rules so now that you've made it you changed the rules to benefit you but hurt the rest of us.
And of course I know you aren't winning. You're a angry loser who thinks liberals screwed you over when it was really Tom delay and Dennis hastert.
define "even playing field"
They unleveled the playing field. Now trump has 8 billion not $1 billion and things are harder for you.
Does what's fair have to also work? I'm asking you. What if what's " fair" doesn't work?
I'll give you an example. A minimum wage person pays so much in taxes every year. Let's say $500 a year to live in America. Well why should a billionaire pay more? Why are they being punished? Do you hear yourself?
Would $500 max per American be the rule regardless of wealth? If not why
I would love to level the playing field as libertarians and Republicans see fit for one year and when middle class Republicans realize what they think is fair is not fair and doesn't work make them live with their decision.
No social security. Anyone who wants the libertarian way would be completely on their own. They'd come crawling back so fast.
Or would they just accept being losers like Kentuckians do under Mitch McConnell.
And then follows up with a lie.Ronald Reagan.Name one. (yawnBanning tax expenditures is a CONSERVATIVE idea
You deserve to be robbed.
It's actually money that makes the playing field unlevel, not race. Rich black kids have it easier than you.I thought we already did that but then Reagan changed things then newt changed things then bush and Tom delay changed things then Jon boehner and Mitch McConnell changed things.To make it an even playing field sure!TRANSLATION: I want government to tilt the playing field toward ME and away from those eeeevil other guys.What we saw when bush took over investing in things the majority of americans want and benefit from like investment in science, public schools, infrastructure and NASA, we now invest less in all these things, gave the rich big tax breaks, and increased how much we spend on haloburton type defense contractors or kock brother type projects.
The rich love pork projects too if they go to their private companies.
(sigh)
Are you successful? How old are you? Well I want that system. The system even a dumb beeoch like you can be a winner.
What I don't want is you and bush rigging the rules so now that you've made it you changed the rules to benefit you but hurt the rest of us.
And of course I know you aren't winning. You're a angry loser who thinks liberals screwed you over when it was really Tom delay and Dennis hastert.
define "even playing field"
They unleveled the playing field. Now trump has 8 billion not $1 billion and things are harder for you.
Does what's fair have to also work? I'm asking you. What if what's " fair" doesn't work?
I'll give you an example. A minimum wage person pays so much in taxes every year. Let's say $500 a year to live in America. Well why should a billionaire pay more? Why are they being punished? Do you hear yourself?
Would $500 max per American be the rule regardless of wealth? If not why
In America today, everyone is assigned a legally-enforceable racial category by the government.
Rights and privileges are then granted or denied based on one's racial membership, with non-whites given preferences over whites.
The federal government does this in the name of anti-racism, of course..
here's a novel concept...you rise based on your own skills, knowledge and aptitude. No discriminatory laws to artificially advance a minority over a qualified white person because of their race.
How's that for a "level playing field"?
...or do you view them as inferior and incapable of achieving on their own without gvt interference?
And then follows up with a lie.Ronald Reagan.Name one. (yawnBanning tax expenditures is a CONSERVATIVE idea
You deserve to be robbed.
Ronald Reagan did not ban all tax expenditures.
Conservatives didn't mind welfare back before black people started using it. Before that they said it was the Christian thing to do.And then follows up with a lie.Ronald Reagan.Name one. (yawnBanning tax expenditures is a CONSERVATIVE idea
You deserve to be robbed.
Ronald Reagan did not ban all tax expenditures.
Back to the subject:
Spending tax money on Special Interests has been illegal ever since the Constitution was ratified. The so-called "Welfare Clause" (better called the Uniformity Clause) was written to make it exactly that way. And liberals (in both parties) have been ignoring and violating it ever since.
Govt"redistribution of wealth" is no more than theft and distribution of stolen goods | Page 21 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
What? when were black people not allowed to collect welfare? Show me the statute forbidding it.Conservatives didn't mind welfare back before black people started using it.And then follows up with a lie.Ronald Reagan.Name one. (yawnBanning tax expenditures is a CONSERVATIVE idea
You deserve to be robbed.
Ronald Reagan did not ban all tax expenditures.
Back to the subject:
Spending tax money on Special Interests has been illegal ever since the Constitution was ratified. The so-called "Welfare Clause" (better called the Uniformity Clause) was written to make it exactly that way. And liberals (in both parties) have been ignoring and violating it ever since.
Govt"redistribution of wealth" is no more than theft and distribution of stolen goods | Page 21 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
From what I've heard, you're a conservative, are you the only rational one on this board?The rubes have been fooled into thinking all their tax problems are the fault of minorities. "Obamaphones". "Food stamp President". Blah, blah, blah.
Social welfare programs add up to only HALF of what tax expenditures add up to.
Half.
The perfect con. Point the finger at the darkie while slipping a hand into your wallet.
"It's that negro's fault. He's buying liquor with his EBT card!"
It's actually money that makes the playing field unlevel, not race. Rich black kids have it easier than you.I thought we already did that but then Reagan changed things then newt changed things then bush and Tom delay changed things then Jon boehner and Mitch McConnell changed things.To make it an even playing field sure!TRANSLATION: I want government to tilt the playing field toward ME and away from those eeeevil other guys.
(sigh)
Are you successful? How old are you? Well I want that system. The system even a dumb beeoch like you can be a winner.
What I don't want is you and bush rigging the rules so now that you've made it you changed the rules to benefit you but hurt the rest of us.
And of course I know you aren't winning. You're a angry loser who thinks liberals screwed you over when it was really Tom delay and Dennis hastert.
define "even playing field"
They unleveled the playing field. Now trump has 8 billion not $1 billion and things are harder for you.
Does what's fair have to also work? I'm asking you. What if what's " fair" doesn't work?
I'll give you an example. A minimum wage person pays so much in taxes every year. Let's say $500 a year to live in America. Well why should a billionaire pay more? Why are they being punished? Do you hear yourself?
Would $500 max per American be the rule regardless of wealth? If not why
In America today, everyone is assigned a legally-enforceable racial category by the government.
Rights and privileges are then granted or denied based on one's racial membership, with non-whites given preferences over whites.
The federal government does this in the name of anti-racism, of course..
here's a novel concept...you rise based on your own skills, knowledge and aptitude. No discriminatory laws to artificially advance a minority over a qualified white person because of their race.
How's that for a "level playing field"?
...or do you view them as inferior and incapable of achieving on their own without gvt interference?
From what I've heard, you're a conservative, are you the only rational one on this board?The rubes have been fooled into thinking all their tax problems are the fault of minorities. "Obamaphones". "Food stamp President". Blah, blah, blah.
Social welfare programs add up to only HALF of what tax expenditures add up to.
Half.
The perfect con. Point the finger at the darkie while slipping a hand into your wallet.
"It's that negro's fault. He's buying liquor with his EBT card!"
You don't know how to figure out if someone's being quoted?From what I've heard, you're a conservative, are you the only rational one on this board?The rubes have been fooled into thinking all their tax problems are the fault of minorities. "Obamaphones". "Food stamp President". Blah, blah, blah.
Social welfare programs add up to only HALF of what tax expenditures add up to.
Half.
The perfect con. Point the finger at the darkie while slipping a hand into your wallet.
"It's that negro's fault. He's buying liquor with his EBT card!"
who?