Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ZzzAs if 1860 compares to todays multi-media world of instant communications. Where Dirty Don Corleone's lies spread across the world twice before the truth has it's morning cup of coffee. The judge has every reason to believe the mob boss like verbal attacks on his clerk would result in death threats by unhinged followers of the Don.
Hence if you can't move the venue outside of the US, you have to preserve the jury pool within the US, which goes right back to gag orders.Of course, that isnt possible. Im not surprised you didnt know that.
Shit for brainsThe militia provides security for the free state.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,...
Similar to the way the police provide security for the people of the state.
Read the words for yourself.
This thread is yet another sad stand for @Golfing Gator …..of all the things I believe he is I never really thought of him as the statist he’s proven himself to be in this thread.
He is a fucking joke.
Is the use of deadly force justified?Lets ignore the peaches-and-chief for a minute. Lets forget him and his gag orders. This is a general question.
Are gag orders constitutional? How can ones speech be silenced with threat of hefty fines, jail, imprisoned to their home etc for talking about the government?
I know there is a Supreme court case about it, but that doesnt really mean anything in this thread. They also said it was constitutional for the tyrant FDR to imprison citizens simply for their heritage, forcing people to salute the flag was constitutional, and a state saying a black and white person couldnt get married was legal
Again, please leave trump out of this. I know TDS is a serious mental condition, but damn..When Silence Isn’t Golden: How Gag Orders Can Evade First Amendment Protections
Trials must be conducted at law, rather than in the press, and courts sometimes feel the need to assert control of the outflow of information around judicial matters to preserve the fair trial rights of litigants.law.yale.edu
You said this, dumbass.yes, you said these words, are you so drunk you cannot recall what you posted?
.No, it doesnt say they can just take away peoples rights
View attachment 849061
And the Air Force is made up of volunteers with nuclear weapons. The weapons of the militia and the weapons of the citizens aren't the same.Shit for brains
A militia is made up of armed volunteers from a certain region. That is how the militia keeps the state free, via armed volunteers and some paid
You said this, dumbass.
"So, again you are against anyone being put in jail since that takes away a number of their rights."
Then you said
"those are your words"
No, moron, they arent. I didnt say that.
Lie again, FAGAt.
So, i lose my rights, because some juror became biased by me exercising my constitutional rights in a perfectly constitutional way?Hence if you can't move the venue outside of the US, you have to preserve the jury pool within the US, which goes right back to gag orders.
Where does it say that can happen in the constitution?
The constitution gave the judicial powers of the US to the supreme and all inferior courts. One of the jobs of the judicial powers is to revoke peoples constitutional rights.
Then why did you ask where the judiciary got that power?mkay
What constitutional rights does the judge take away when someone is convicted of a crime?
The judge doesnt do that, the states do.The right to bear arms
The right to assemble
The right to vote
Just to name a few
Where does the judicial branch get the power to just take away someones rights?
It's no different than somebody loses their right to hunt within city limits. Towns have all kinds of edible critters running around, but you're not allowed to use your 2nd amendment rights to hunt them, because the government is protecting the rights of the other people in the town, the right not to be shot by stray bullets.So, i lose my rights, because some juror became biased by me exercising my constitutional rights in a perfectly constitutional way?
Where does it say that can happen in the constitution?
I have been waiting for these exceptions in the constitution, and no one can quote them.
Still waiting.It's no different than somebody loses their right to hunt within city limits. Towns have all kinds of edible critters running around, but you're not allowed to use your 2nd amendment rights to hunt them, because the government is protecting the rights of the other people in the town, the right not to be shot by stray bullets.
