Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you actually expect ANYONE to accept that as a valid argument? Air and ocean temperatures have increased and that thermal energy is the source that drives hurricanes. With what part of that statement do you disagree?
When experts are paid to lie, they are no longer experts.
Moron.NASA and NOAA faked climate data in the GISTEMP global temperature record to exaggerate global warming.If you actually know of anyone who is still spreading fake information concerning anthropogenic climate change who is still being paid by the dirty fuel cartel, you should name them, Skippy. An Exxon lobbyist spilled the beans, and the self-serving fraud of the American Petroleum Institute, Exxon Mobil and Shell Corporations has been exposed, but if you know of any such scams still afoot, out them, by all means!
[Was Global Warming Data 'Faked' to 'Fit Climate Change Fictions'?]
Do crackpot notions with no credible evidence occur in threes? Willful ignorance concerning who the duly-elected President of the United States is, goofball ideological taboos concerning Covid vaccines, and nutcase refusal to recognize the overwhelming evidence for anthropogenic climate change seem to arise from the same susceptibility to conspiracy nonsense.
All such misconceptions have adverse consequences to the extent that gullible sorts are duped into swallowing them. Ignorance comes at a price. E.g.,
Insider reported on Tuesday that the highest number of new cases caused by the highly infectious Delta coronavirus variant are mostly in states with low vaccination rates — which on the whole are Republican.
... the overwhelming evidence for anthropogenic climate change ...
You keep saying this, I do not think you know what it means ... you've already admitted you have very little knowledge of science, how would you know if there's scientific evidence or not? ...
Death tolls from hurricanes was measured in the thousand when I was a kid, tornadoes in the hundreds ... today temperatures are 1ºC warmer and these death tolls rarely exceed 100 ... this tread is going to continue so should we be expecting deaths from weather to be eliminated? ...
Ocean surface temperature has been warm enough for millions of years to spawn Tropical storms and Hurricanes, thus your statement is misleading and after the fact. But temperature alone isn't enough, there are other factors that determine the development of storms to progress beyond the tropical depression level.
ReinyDays is correct the death toll has dropped dramatically over the decades as this chart that seems to anger many shows:
View attachment 514221
Please provide your list of the international scientific bodies, national governments, and U.S. governmental departments and agencies, as well as any U.S. mayors, who have been won over by the ideologues in denial of science.ReinyDays is correct the death toll has dropped dramatically over the decades as this chart that seems to anger many shows:
This is mainly due to advances in science and technology, especially Doppler radar and to a lessor degree weather satellites ... truly amazing how much better we are today at preventing human suffering than just 50 years ago ... where will this be in 100 years? ... Brave New World indeed ...
As more Republicans engage on the topic, they’ll breathe new life into ideas designed to reduce pollution without putting people out of work, leverage natural solutions to lower emissions, and create pathways for all Americans – especially those closest to the environment, such as our farmers and ranchers – in the fight against climate change.
That's debatable, but with the ideologists in denial of anthropogenic climate change unable to sell their notion to any scientific body anywhere on earth, and not a single nation sharing their refusal to respect the science, alternatives to dirty fuels are imperative.That's great news!!
How many new nuke plants should we build?
alternatives to dirty fuels are imperative.
The fact that the ideologues in denial are impotent in convincing any scientific body, or any nation, of their antic notion is encouraging.Are the anti-science zealots accepting anthropogenic climate change yet?
Don't know. But us anti-hoax "zealots" aren't. You can only fool some of the people all of the time.
I'm glad that you are opting for science. A few are still in denial and cling to their ideological dogma.
Nuclear is among the alternatives to dirty fuels that must be debated.
If you wish to be an advocate for nuclear, or any other alternative to dirty fuels, you should initiate a thread to make your case. Others are likely to have differing preferences. Don't be afraid to discuss your solution. There are valid pluses and minuses for all.What is there to debate?
It's reliable, large-scale, baseline power that emits no CO2.
But the reality is the hoaxers want to keep people panicked so that they are easily controlled and separated from their valuables by the self-proclaimed "experts". Get a clue: Antarctica is still there. The polar bears remain happy. And costal cities are still dry. Follow the moneyThe fact that the ideologues in denial are impotent in convincing any scientific body, or any nation, of their antic notion is encouraging.
It is necessary to deal with reality.
The fringe ideological dogmatists need to resort to such evidence-fee paranoid delusions to explain why all reputable scientific academies, societies and research centers as well as the governments of all the nations on earth acknowledge the reality, of course.But the reality is the hoaxers want to keep people panicked so that they are easily controlled and separated from their valuables by the self-proclaimed "experts". Get a clue: Antarctica is still there. The polar bears remain happy. And costal cities are still dry. Follow the money
If you wish to be an advocate for nuclear, or any other alternative to dirty fuels, you should initiate a thread to make your case. Others are likely to have differing preferences. Don't be afraid to discuss your solution. There are valid pluses and minuses for all.
Yes, the dirty fuel cartel has profited handsomely, but the cost to humanity is far too great.
The fringe ideological dogmatists need to resort to such evidence-fee paranoid delusions to explain why all reputable scientific academies, societies and research centers as well as the governments of all the nations on earth acknowledge the reality, of course.The fringe ideological dogmatists need to resort to such evidence-fee paranoid delusions to explain why all reputable scientific academies, societies and research centers as well as the governments of all the nations on earth acknowledge the reality, of course.
Yes, the dirty fuel cartel has profited handsomely, but the cost to humanity is far too great.
If we burn all the cow dung as fuel, then what will Schmidlap and his kind eat for food?
The fringe ideological dogmatists need to resort to such evidence-fee paranoid delusions to explain why all reputable scientific academies, societies and research centers as well as the governments of all the nations on earth acknowledge the reality, of course.
Yes, the dirty fuel cartel has profited handsomely, but the cost to humanity is far too great.
:extract_focal()/https%3A%2F%2Fpocket-syndicated-images.s3.amazonaws.com%2Farticles%2F4333%2F1589290742_can-civilization-survive.jpg)
