blastoff
Undocumented Reg. User
Perhaps it is biased in favor of those who have had the value of a good education instilled in them and have worked hard to accomplish it, regardless of what race they might be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe the SAT is biased against those who attended horrible schools?
Perhaps if we stopped asking racist questions, we would stop being a racist society?
Perhaps it is biased in favor of those who have had the value of a good education instilled in them and have worked hard to accomplish it, regardless of what race they might be.
Good job spreading disinformation, asshole.
Perhaps it is biased in favor of those who have had the value of a good education instilled in them and have worked hard to accomplish it, regardless of what race they might be.
Perhaps it is biased in favor of those who have had the value of a good education instilled in them and have worked hard to accomplish it, regardless of what race they might be.
Nicely put.
Some time ago I read "Jewish Mystique" by Ernest Van Den Haag, a professor at NYU. He had a theory that laid out an interesting scenario:
1. A Jew who was very smart married the towns richest man's daughter, and was basically supported to study his whole life, and had many children who carried his genes into the population of Jews...
2. A Christian who was very smart would become a member of the clergy, and, due to celibacy, removed his genes from the Christian gene pool.
Therefore...well, you get the idea.
I wonder if one can come up with scenarios that result in a racial segment of the population has the SAT problem under discussion.
I can think of several.
And here I though they had evened it all out and were going to give the test in ebonics.
Perhaps it is biased in favor of those who have had the value of a good education instilled in them and have worked hard to accomplish it, regardless of what race they might be.
Nicely put.
Some time ago I read "Jewish Mystique" by Ernest Van Den Haag, a professor at NYU. He had a theory that laid out an interesting scenario:
1. A Jew who was very smart married the towns richest man's daughter, and was basically supported to study his whole life, and had many children who carried his genes into the population of Jews...
2. A Christian who was very smart would become a member of the clergy, and, due to celibacy, removed his genes from the Christian gene pool.
Therefore...well, you get the idea.
I wonder if one can come up with scenarios that result in a racial segment of the population has the SAT problem under discussion.
I can think of several.
Your point should have actually stated that Rabbis were chosen from the smartest ranks of the jews, supported by their community and ecouraged to have many children. This was a very eugenic process and is very likely to have influenced the demonstrated intellectual strength of jews.
Nicely put.
Some time ago I read "Jewish Mystique" by Ernest Van Den Haag, a professor at NYU. He had a theory that laid out an interesting scenario:
1. A Jew who was very smart married the towns richest man's daughter, and was basically supported to study his whole life, and had many children who carried his genes into the population of Jews...
2. A Christian who was very smart would become a member of the clergy, and, due to celibacy, removed his genes from the Christian gene pool.
Therefore...well, you get the idea.
I wonder if one can come up with scenarios that result in a racial segment of the population has the SAT problem under discussion.
I can think of several.
Your point should have actually stated that Rabbis were chosen from the smartest ranks of the jews, supported by their community and ecouraged to have many children. This was a very eugenic process and is very likely to have influenced the demonstrated intellectual strength of jews.
While I try to avoid using the term 'eugenics' in a positive sense, it is accurate in this connection.
My point is that nurture, not nature is what determines success.
While I am not denying any of the negative stats in this thread, I tried to open the door to the 'Acting White' depressor, and the acceptance of social pressures.
Would not the intelligence of a person effect a persons ability to nurture?My point is that nurture, not nature is what determines success.
Would not the intelligence of a person effect a persons ability to nurture?My point is that nurture, not nature is what determines success.