Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WASHINGTON — Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection next week are also some of the biggest recipients of campaign contributions from Facebook employees directly and the political action committee funded by employees. Facebook a big contributor to the committees in Congress that will question Mark Zuckerberg
It is not possible to protect one's privacy when one willfully chooses to put one's "sh*t" on a public platform. If one makes the information available, it's nobody's fault but one's own that one's "sh*t" gets used by folks who want to use it and purchase the right to use it. Nobody made anyone agree to terms of service that FB very clearly disclosed.Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection
It is funny. All you have to do is look at the legislation the two parties put up for vote when they are in power. That tells the story.Depends on the spending.It is amazing how many people don't understand that...Neither party is against gov't regulations. Neither party is in favor of smaller gov't. Both parties spend like drunken sailors.
Just thought I would clear that up.
Democrats spend on education, pro active healthcare, research, veterans benefits, job training, infrastructure, things that help the country.
Republicans cut taxes for billionaires and corporations that are doing the best they ever have and they spend 700 billion MORE on the a military that's bigger than the next ten countries put together because of the money they can make off it and they want to spend an unknown number of billions more on a fuking wall.
They are not the same.
Since they added characters.I like Twitterface.
Tell it to your fellow travelers upset about Trump getting their info just like Obama and Clinton didWASHINGTON — Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection next week are also some of the biggest recipients of campaign contributions from Facebook employees directly and the political action committee funded by employees. Facebook a big contributor to the committees in Congress that will question Mark ZuckerbergIt is not possible to protect one's privacy when one willfully chooses to put one's "sh*t" on a public platform. If one makes the information available, it's nobody's fault but one's own that one's "sh*t" gets used by folks who want to use it and purchase the right to use it. Nobody made anyone agree to terms of service that FB very clearly disclosed.Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection
WASHINGTON — Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection next week are also some of the biggest recipients of campaign contributions from Facebook employees directly and the political action committee funded by employees. Facebook a big contributor to the committees in Congress that will question Mark ZuckerbergIt is not possible to protect one's privacy when one willfully chooses to put one's "sh*t" on a public platform. If one makes the information available, it's nobody's fault but one's own that one's "sh*t" gets used by folks who want to use it and purchase the right to use it. Nobody made anyone agree to terms of service that FB very clearly disclosed.Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection
I have the same words for anyone, regardless of on what side of the political fence one sits.Tell it to your fellow travelers upset about Trump getting their info just like Obama and Clinton did
In today's Facebook hearing, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) remarked:
Seriously!?!
- What sort of unprincipled SOB is Kennedy that he is openly proposing regulations as a threat to control the behavior of a private business?
- When did Republicans shift into being advocates for more "nanny state" policies rather than less?
We are against unnecessary regulation ...try to keep up
Republicans are for the most part hypocrites; they are as inconsistent as they are dishonest.In today's Facebook hearing, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) remarked:
Seriously!?!
- What sort of unprincipled SOB is Kennedy that he is openly proposing regulations as a threat to control the behavior of a private business?
- When did Republicans shift into being advocates for more "nanny state" policies rather than less?
There are those who will make the argument that because online/wireless technology is so pervasive, because it would be impossible to function as a productive, engaged member of 21st Century society, that government should be compelled to regulate all that is online and digital as a public utility in the interest of the common good – that ‘opting out’ is simply not an option.WASHINGTON — Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection next week are also some of the biggest recipients of campaign contributions from Facebook employees directly and the political action committee funded by employees. Facebook a big contributor to the committees in Congress that will question Mark ZuckerbergIt is not possible to protect one's privacy when one willfully chooses to put one's "sh*t" on a public platform. If one makes the information available, it's nobody's fault but one's own that one's "sh*t" gets used by folks who want to use it and purchase the right to use it. Nobody made anyone agree to terms of service that FB very clearly disclosed.Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection
In today's Facebook hearing, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) remarked:
Seriously!?!
- What sort of unprincipled SOB is Kennedy that he is openly proposing regulations as a threat to control the behavior of a private business?
- When did Republicans shift into being advocates for more "nanny state" policies rather than less?
Republicans only believe in limited government when it suits them to
There are those who will make the argument that because online/wireless technology is so pervasive, because it would be impossible to function as a productive, engaged member of 21st Century society, that government should be compelled to regulate all that is online and digital as a public utility in the interest of the common good – that ‘opting out’ is simply not an option.WASHINGTON — Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection next week are also some of the biggest recipients of campaign contributions from Facebook employees directly and the political action committee funded by employees. Facebook a big contributor to the committees in Congress that will question Mark ZuckerbergIt is not possible to protect one's privacy when one willfully chooses to put one's "sh*t" on a public platform. If one makes the information available, it's nobody's fault but one's own that one's "sh*t" gets used by folks who want to use it and purchase the right to use it. Nobody made anyone agree to terms of service that FB very clearly disclosed.Members of the House and Senate committees that will question Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about user privacy protection
And the primary regulatory goal would be to safeguard citizens’ privacy and personal information.
I'm sure you're correct in asserting that there are folks who'd assert that. The thing is this: citizens don't need help protecting the privacy of their data. All they have to do is not put it on the Internet, or in other people's hands, and it'll be kept more than adequately private.the primary regulatory goal would be to safeguard citizens’ privacy and personal information.
