The law was too broadly written.
But for the other ones coming up to pass in other states, they will be narrowed more to a situation where you are forcing someone else to practice gay cult values in violation of their faith. How they would "know" you are and my boyfriend getting married", or "will you cater my wedding to my gay is if you are standing there asking them to make a gay wedding cake with two guys on top or two women. Or if you said "will you photograph me husband"?
On those grounds christians are required to refuse to participate re: Jude 1 and Romans 1 and the warning of being sent to hell for eternity for enabling a Sodom like takeover of another culture.
I'd actually argue the opposite. The law was too narrowly written. The problem here is with the idea that government can force us to cater to other people against our will. Outside of enforcing contractual obligations, the state simply has no business micro-managing our personal decisions like this.
"Personal decisions" of homosexuality are more than just personal decisions. They are societal decisions, which affect everyone. The state has plenty of business micromanaging it.
Nope. Not as long as it's between consenting adults. It's none of your business, nor the state's.