As a Black voter, I find this offensive: ‘What about 9/11?’ Twitter furious after Biden calls Capitol storming ‘worst attack since Civil War"

They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.
See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

furnished with weapons

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.
Armed means carrying and controlling a weapon. The definition of weapon includes club, stick, mace, sword, knife etc. There is NO legal requirement that someone possess a gun to be charged as "armed".

When you yell about people being armed, you make people thing "gun". It's just that simple.

So all those anti-fa rioters were armed then?

More than 90% of the protests by BLM and others following the murder of George Floyd were peaceful. Many of the few that did become violent WERE due to actions by Proud Boys, Oathkeepers and other right wing, white supremacist organizations masquerading as protestors. The police have found NO masquerading rioters in their investigations into the January 6th attack on the Capitol. January 6th was an attempt by Trump to use his followers to halt the conclusion of the US presidential election and maintain his presidency. That's a god damned fact that everyone not lying to themselves KNOWS TO BE TRUE.

LOL the whole "right wing did it" trope.

And as for the capitol thing.

BLM activist inside Capitol claims he was 'documenting' riots, once said 'burn it all down'

How many people from the group that marched to the capitol actually entered it?

90% peaceful...

90


Moar 90% peaceful

https:%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fmaven-user-photos%2Fbluelivesmatter%2Finternal%2FIFAB6Pm_7Ue7PnzqTRRuTA%2FdKlpCxukc0CMgZ3GFYQnrA


And the Right wing false flags arrested:

NINTCHDBPICT000613306505.jpg
 
Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.

Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

There has never been an "arms" control treaty in this country that mentioned guns. So somebody doesn't understand what "arms" means.
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president. That would have failed anyway but they weren't the brightest bulbs.

Then they could have been charged with kidnapping, and the government would still have not fallen.

And there was no mechanism for Trump to be declared the winner anyway.
The entire thing was an attempt to coerce the Congress to name Trump the winner.

The event was a protest by people that believed the election was flawed.
 
Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.


No guns were found on the Trump supporters....so an "insurrection," was fucking impossible, you doofus........

The only individual killed was an unarmed, female Trump supporter who was shot without any attempt at an arrest.....

Trump supporters calmly walked through the hallways and took selfies....the blm and antifa democrat party brownshirts attacked police and vandalized the building...

What are you shit for brains going to do when it is finally revealed that the actual violent attackers were blm and antifa.....the same way it was finally exposed that the cop wasn't hit with a fire extinguisher, and didn't die from violence...

What are you morons going to do?



The rioters were armed and are being charged with crimes as such. The debate here is utterly pointless. Ashli Babbit was in a group threatening to kill elected members of Congress, was attempting to breach a door to the Speaker's Lobby which had not yet been evacuated. She was clearly warned that if she attempted to breech that door, she would be shot. She made the decision to go ahead and she is completely responsible for the consequences.

The people we saw attacking police officers, smashing their way through windows and doors were NOT calmly walking through hallways.

There were NO BLM or antifa (whatever the fuck you think that might be) in the riots. Numerous rioters have said precisely that. They were Trump supporters from top to bottom.

Given the number of moronic statements you've just made, your final query is misdirected.
 
When you say someone was armed, everyone thinks gun. if not they say something like armed with a knife, or armed with a bat. when you just hear armed you think gun.
Officer Shoots and Kills Man Armed With Sword in Pennsburg ...
Feb 9, 2021 — A police officer shot and killed a man who was armed with a sword in Pennsburg, Pennsylvania,
 
When you say someone was armed, everyone thinks gun. if not they say something like armed with a knife, or armed with a bat. when you just hear armed you think gun.
Officer Shoots and Kills Man Armed With Sword in Pennsburg ...
Feb 9, 2021 — A police officer shot and killed a man who was armed with a sword in Pennsburg, Pennsylvania,

Again armed with sword.

Worcester Police Shoot, Kill Heavily Armed Man Making Bomb Threat

Worcester Police Shoot, Kill Heavily Armed Man Making Bomb Threat

According to Worcester District Attorney Joe Early, Jr., Gouvonvong was wearing body armor and appeared to be armed with an assault rifle and an explosive device with wires. He was also carrying a backpack.

They note the explosive, the armed being a firearm is implied.
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president.
calvin-and-hobbes-rofl.jpg
LOL

This guy's facing 20 years in prison. You think he's laughing?

gettyimages-1294932395-cropped.jpg
That's a dummy, dummy.
LOLOL

Yes, like you, he's a fucking moron.
 
As an Educated Black man, I find this offensive and I urge all Fellow Black voters to reject the Democratic Policy.

Explain in your own “educated” words what you find offensive about stating the fact that the January 6 assault on the Capitol while in session to certify the election was the ‘worst attack in the Capitol since the Civil War?

In my point of view it cannot be offensive to state a fact. stating a fact may be offensive to those that find facts offensive such as Trump supporter consistently do.
 
They tampered with the election, are governing by EO in spite of having a majority in the house and senate and the presidency, talking about trying to change the Court so that they have a majority, and talking about getting rid of the filibuster so they don't have to have a supermajority to get all of their divisive policies through against the will of at least half the country. Now who is attacking our democracy?
 
They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.
See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

furnished with weapons

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.
Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.

Words have meanings that are also interpreted by most people, and most people think "gun" when you call a person armed.
Hutch Starskey so when a dispatcher calls out for a cop to be on the look out for an armed suspect, what do you think they mean?
It means they have a weapon.


A Columbus, Ohio, police officer fatally shot a teen girl Tuesday afternoon while responding to a call about someone armed with a knife, officials said.
 
Good to know we can overthrow the government with just a few dozen people trespassing in the Capitol.
Those 280 million guns can be kept in our gun safes.
Why lie about how many stormed the Capitol? "Few dozen?" Some 400 have already been arrested and another roughly 200 are still being hunted down. So by a "few dozen," you really mean about 50 dozen?

In what rightarded world is 50, a few?
Almost all of them were charged with nothing more than trespassing, NAZI.
So? Many were charged with more serious charges and more charges are coming.
 
They note the explosive, the armed being a firearm is implied.
§930. Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities

(a) Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.

(b) Whoever, with intent that a firearm or other dangerous weapon be used in the commission of a crime, knowingly possesses or causes to be present such firearm or dangerous weapon in a Federal facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(2) The term “dangerous weapon” means a weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, except that such term does not include a pocket knife with a blade of less than 21/2 inches in length.
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president. That would have failed anyway but they weren't the brightest bulbs.

Then they could have been charged with kidnapping, and the government would still have not fallen.

And there was no mechanism for Trump to be declared the winner anyway.
They felt otherwise. They stormed the Capitol to "stop the steal." Trump told them to stop the steal and so they tried. That means stopping Biden from being certified as the president and declaring Trump as president.
Nothing in the Constitution says that Congress can't refuse to certify the electoral votes, NAZI.
I never said there was, fucking moron. :cuckoo:

In fact, that was the goal of those seditious insurrectionists.
 
They had no guns, moron. That's what "unarmed" means. It doesn't mean a few of them had hollow aluminum flag poles that wouldn't even make a bump on your head.
See that, fucking moron? It is once again you who's proving you're a fucking moron, no one else needs to.

Fucking moron, "armed" does not mean "guns." It means any weapon which can include guns but doesn't need to.

furnished with weapons

In our society when you call someone armed, it is assumed it's with a firearm.

usually when it's a melee weapon it's referred to as wielding.
Words have meaning, even if you don't know what that is. "Armed" means being in possession of a weapon. That mob was armed.
your head is mobbed with delusional thoughts....just saying
 
Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.


No guns were found on the Trump supporters....so an "insurrection," was fucking impossible, you doofus........

The only individual killed was an unarmed, female Trump supporter who was shot without any attempt at an arrest.....

Trump supporters calmly walked through the hallways and took selfies....the blm and antifa democrat party brownshirts attacked police and vandalized the building...

What are you shit for brains going to do when it is finally revealed that the actual violent attackers were blm and antifa.....the same way it was finally exposed that the cop wasn't hit with a fire extinguisher, and didn't die from violence...

What are you morons going to do?


There needs to be an attempt to arrest before shooting someone?
 
They note the explosive, the armed being a firearm is implied.
§930. Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities

(a) Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.

(b) Whoever, with intent that a firearm or other dangerous weapon be used in the commission of a crime, knowingly possesses or causes to be present such firearm or dangerous weapon in a Federal facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(2) The term “dangerous weapon” means a weapon, device, instrument, material, or substance, animate or inanimate, that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, except that such term does not include a pocket knife with a blade of less than 21/2 inches in length.

Changing the subject. The issue is over how people perceive when the media says someone is "armed".

You are losing the particular argument on the topic.
 

Forum List

Back
Top