As a Black voter, I find this offensive: ‘What about 9/11?’ Twitter furious after Biden calls Capitol storming ‘worst attack since Civil War"

It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?

Do you argue that they could not physically have killed Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Ocasio-Cortez or any of the other elected officials for whom they were hunting?

They could have started killing the cops they were getting past and they didn't. They didn't kill the media people recording them.

And your question is goalpost moving. Even detaining congress wouldn't have overthrown the government.

The only person who died in the capitol was an unarmed woman, and you guys jerk off to images of that.

The Capitol police were not the targets of their attack. If they had tried to kill them, the police would have started shooting - and probably have thrown the crowd into a stampede.

Stopping Congress from performing their constitutional duty IS overthrowing the government.

And BTW - you're a really disgusting pervert. Keep it to yourself PERV!!!
Congress isn't required to certify the vote, moron.

Sorry, I meant the electoral college - but you knew that.
Neither is the electoral college, moron. They are required to perform the process, but not to arrive at a specific conclusion.

They are required to certify the electoral vote count.

Are you truly that stupid or are you just pretending?
No, they are not required to say the result is correct, asshole.
You're truly a fucking moron. They have one of two choices ... accept the slates provided by the states or reject them. They accepted them. That's tantamount as accepting them as correct.
All the protesters wanted is for the results from some states to be rejected. That's perfectly inline with what you just posted.
Fucking moron, again ... accepting the electoral votes is tantamount to saying the results are correct. What part of that is your limited abilities unable to comprehend?
Where does the Constitution say Congress is required to accept the electoral votes? What part of "they aren't required to accept them" didn't you understand?

What a fucking moron.
Fucking moron, what part of, "they have one of two choices ... accept the slates provided by the states or reject them," are you incapable of understanding?
 
Once again, NAZI, no one was armed.
Tell that to DOJ, who have charged dozens of them with armed assault and weapons possession.

Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.


Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

They had iphones and took selfies...meanwhile, blm and antifa brown shirts of the democrat party attacked the police and vandalized the building.
LOL

Your lunacy is noted and laughed at.


the FBI has said there is “no indication at this time” that Antifa had played a role in the mob that stormed the Capitol.
 
Nothing in the Constitution says that Congress can't refuse to certify the electoral votes, NAZI.
I never said there was, fucking moron. :cuckoo:

In fact, that was the goal of those seditious insurrectionists.
The constitution empowers congress to do just that on a state by state basis, but only by a majority vote of both houses.

The insurrectionists needed a way to stop congress from certifying, not force them to vote.
 
Apparently a few dozen unarmed trespassers really has the Leftards shaken up. Uncle Joe especially. A drunk unarmed guy in a Viking hat almost took control of our government.
Aside from the fact that we are not a democracy but a representative constitutional republic - or at least we were - and that the "attack" was carried out by agents provocateurs of the Democrats in the form of BLM/Antifa confederates dressed as MAGA rally goers and police who with malice aforethought were either were kept away from the Capitol building or allowed the aforementioned BlaM-tifarians to enter the building and in one case assassinated an unarmed rally goer Ashli Babbitt, the absolute ludicrousness of the statement would be laughable were it not for the fact that a large percentage of our population think 9/11 is a convenience store, Pearl Harbor is a grunge band from Seattle and have no idea what the Civil War is.

They were not "rally goers"
they were not "protestors"
they were not "drunken partiers"
the were not "rowdy college kids"

They were violent insurgents bent on overthrowing our government in favor of their fascist dictator tRump.

Stop trying to minimize this.
Well, they have to, of course.

It was just a Capitol building tour that got a little rowdy, that's all!

The Dems should be sending these people Thank You cards.
"It was just a Capitol building tour that got a little rowdy, that's all!"

That's pretty much is all it was. The capitol police even escorted protesters through the building.

No one is fooled by this scam claim that it was an "insurrection."
 
Last edited:
Once again, NAZI, no one was armed.
Tell that to DOJ, who have charged dozens of them with armed assault and weapons possession.

Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.


Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

They had iphones and took selfies...meanwhile, blm and antifa brown shirts of the democrat party attacked the police and vandalized the building.
LOL

Your lunacy is noted and laughed at.

the FBI has said there is “no indication at this time” that Antifa had played a role in the mob that stormed the Capitol.
Straw man argument. No one claimed that none of them were Trump supporters.

When are you fucking Dim NAZIs ever going to come clean?
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president. That would have failed anyway but they weren't the brightest bulbs.

Then they could have been charged with kidnapping, and the government would still have not fallen.

And there was no mechanism for Trump to be declared the winner anyway.
They felt otherwise. They stormed the Capitol to "stop the steal." Trump told them to stop the steal and so they tried. That means stopping Biden from being certified as the president and declaring Trump as president.

Trump told them to peacefully protest, you left that part out.
Well, no, he said he assumed they would be peaceful. He didn't instruct them to be peaceful...

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

He also told them to "fight like hell" and "stop the steal."
 
It was just a Capitol building tour that got a little rowdy, that's all! The Dems should be sending these people Thank You cards.
"It was just a Capitol building tour that got a little rowdy, that's all!"
That's pretty much all it was. The capitol police even escorted protesters through the building.
Do I know these people?

:dunno:
 
Changing the subject. The issue is over how people perceive when the media says someone is "armed".

You are losing the particular argument on the topic.

Your argument is that people ASS-U-ME that armed means with a gun?
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president. That would have failed anyway but they weren't the brightest bulbs.

Then they could have been charged with kidnapping, and the government would still have not fallen.

And there was no mechanism for Trump to be declared the winner anyway.
They felt otherwise. They stormed the Capitol to "stop the steal." Trump told them to stop the steal and so they tried. That means stopping Biden from being certified as the president and declaring Trump as president.

Trump told them to peacefully protest, you left that part out.
Well, no, he said he assumed they would be peaceful. He didn't instruct them to be peaceful...

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

He also told them to "fight like hell" and "stop the steal."

If all you got is quibbling like this, you ain't got shit.

And if fight like hell is fighting words...

Clinton Fundraising: We Have to Fight Like Hell to Beat Trump

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).
 
Changing the subject. The issue is over how people perceive when the media says someone is "armed".

You are losing the particular argument on the topic.

Your argument is that people ASS-U-ME that armed means with a gun?

The argument is what armed means to people when commonly used.

you use armed to imply a threat much greater than there was. They were armed with improvised implements, not firearms.

Common media practice seems to be to indicate what someone was armed with if it wasn't a firearm.
 
Nothing in the Constitution says that Congress can't refuse to certify the electoral votes, NAZI.
I never said there was, fucking moron. :cuckoo:

In fact, that was the goal of those seditious insurrectionists.
The constitution empowers congress to do just that on a state by state basis, but only by a majority vote of both houses.

The insurrectionists needed a way to stop congress from certifying, not force them to vote.
The place you do it is where they certify the count, moron.
 
Nothing in the Constitution says that Congress can't refuse to certify the electoral votes, NAZI.
I never said there was, fucking moron. :cuckoo:

In fact, that was the goal of those seditious insurrectionists.
The constitution empowers congress to do just that on a state by state basis, but only by a majority vote of both houses.

The insurrectionists needed a way to stop congress from certifying, not force them to vote.
Aren't you a Canadian? What the fuck do you know about the US Constitution?
 
Once again, NAZI, no one was armed.
Tell that to DOJ, who have charged dozens of them with armed assault and weapons possession.

Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.


Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

They had iphones and took selfies...meanwhile, blm and antifa brown shirts of the democrat party attacked the police and vandalized the building.
LOL

Your lunacy is noted and laughed at.

the FBI has said there is “no indication at this time” that Antifa had played a role in the mob that stormed the Capitol.
Straw man argument. No one claimed that none of them were Trump supporters.

When are you fucking Dim NAZIs ever going to come clean?
Fucking moron, I posted an article showing the FBI found no evidence that BLM or Antifa played a role in that insurrection. That destroyed the idiocy by some other poster that it was BLM and Antifa who committed those crimes.
 
Once again, NAZI, no one was armed.
Tell that to DOJ, who have charged dozens of them with armed assault and weapons possession.

Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.


Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

They had iphones and took selfies...meanwhile, blm and antifa brown shirts of the democrat party attacked the police and vandalized the building.
LOL

Your lunacy is noted and laughed at.

the FBI has said there is “no indication at this time” that Antifa had played a role in the mob that stormed the Capitol.
Furthermore, we all know that the FBI is just another tool of the Democrat Party.
 
Once again, NAZI, no one was armed.
Tell that to DOJ, who have charged dozens of them with armed assault and weapons possession.

Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.


Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

They had iphones and took selfies...meanwhile, blm and antifa brown shirts of the democrat party attacked the police and vandalized the building.
LOL

Your lunacy is noted and laughed at.

the FBI has said there is “no indication at this time” that Antifa had played a role in the mob that stormed the Capitol.
Straw man argument. No one claimed that none of them were Trump supporters.

When are you fucking Dim NAZIs ever going to come clean?
Fucking moron, I posted an article showing the FBI found no evidence that BLM or Antifa played a role in that insurrection. That destroyed the idiocy by some other poster that it was BLM and Antifa who committed those crimes.
Anyone who believes the FBI is a fucking moron. They've been show to be a nest of traitors who do the Democrat party's bidding.
 
It's amazing and almost humorous that these wingnuts think that they're going to gaslight the world into believing that the Jan. 6 attempt to overthrow democracy was just a harmless group of people that did nothing more than trespass.

It's not going to work. We know what we saw:

An extremely violent mob of several thousand people attempting to stop the certification of the freely and legally elected President in order to force the continuation of Trump's Presidency. It was an insurrection against Democracy and against America.

The fact that they did not have any firearms does not change the lethal nature of their attack. We CAN assume that if they had succeeded in getting to Congress they would have murdered at several Congresspeople and the vice-President. There is no reason to assume otherwise.

All those who participated deserve a minimum of 5 years in prison, and the worst of them should get at least 25 years.

Again, what mechanism that they could have applied with the tools and numbers on hand could have led to an overthrow of the government?
They could have taken lawmakers as hostages and held them for ransom unless they declared Trump as president. That would have failed anyway but they weren't the brightest bulbs.

Then they could have been charged with kidnapping, and the government would still have not fallen.

And there was no mechanism for Trump to be declared the winner anyway.
They felt otherwise. They stormed the Capitol to "stop the steal." Trump told them to stop the steal and so they tried. That means stopping Biden from being certified as the president and declaring Trump as president.

Trump told them to peacefully protest, you left that part out.
Well, no, he said he assumed they would be peaceful. He didn't instruct them to be peaceful...

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

He also told them to "fight like hell" and "stop the steal."

If all you got is quibbling like this, you ain't got shit.

And if fight like hell is fighting words...

Clinton Fundraising: We Have to Fight Like Hell to Beat Trump

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).
Who's quibbling? You falsely claimed Trump told his mob to peacefully protest. He said no such thing. You lied again.

And who believed Clinton meant to be violent like Trump's mob did?
 
Changing the subject. The issue is over how people perceive when the media says someone is "armed".

You are losing the particular argument on the topic.

Your argument is that people ASS-U-ME that armed means with a gun?

The argument is what armed means to people when commonly used.

you use armed to imply a threat much greater than there was. They were armed with improvised implements, not firearms.

Common media practice seems to be to indicate what someone was armed with if it wasn't a firearm.
LOL

It matters not what you think other people think. "Armed" means armed with a weapon; which might or might not mean a firearm. That mob was armed. That's why some of them are charged with being armed.
 
Once again, NAZI, no one was armed.
Tell that to DOJ, who have charged dozens of them with armed assault and weapons possession.

Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.


Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

They had iphones and took selfies...meanwhile, blm and antifa brown shirts of the democrat party attacked the police and vandalized the building.
LOL

Your lunacy is noted and laughed at.

the FBI has said there is “no indication at this time” that Antifa had played a role in the mob that stormed the Capitol.
Straw man argument. No one claimed that none of them were Trump supporters.

When are you fucking Dim NAZIs ever going to come clean?
Fucking moron, I posted an article showing the FBI found no evidence that BLM or Antifa played a role in that insurrection. That destroyed the idiocy by some other poster that it was BLM and Antifa who committed those crimes.


Yeah? They also told us the cop was killed by Trump supporters who hit him in the head with a fire extinguisher....until they then lied and blamed it on getting sprayed with bear spray......

The FBI gave up their credibility when they lied on FISA warrants to federal judges...you dumb shit.
 
Once again, NAZI, no one was armed.
Tell that to DOJ, who have charged dozens of them with armed assault and weapons possession.

Arms don't mean just firearms. Remember, there were arms well before the invention of gunpowder.


Not to take over the government you moron.........you need guns for that, and they didn't have them......

They had iphones and took selfies...meanwhile, blm and antifa brown shirts of the democrat party attacked the police and vandalized the building.
LOL

Your lunacy is noted and laughed at.

the FBI has said there is “no indication at this time” that Antifa had played a role in the mob that stormed the Capitol.
Furthermore, we all know that the FBI is just another tool of the Democrat Party.
LOL

You should contact the FBI -- they're still in possession of your brain. It appears they never returned it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top