Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is extremely stupid to ask "what is a woman" to a judge.
A judge is supposed to weigh between arguments, not come up with their own.
And a judge is supposed to reference the legislative backdrop, not come up with their own.
But as a person who does have some biological knowledge, I can tell you no one knows what a woman is.
While we frequently use a vagina vs a penis as a reference, what about a hermaphrodite who has both?
We frequently consider the XX chromosomes as opposed to XY, but what about XXY or XYY?
There are also hundreds, if not thousands of other exceptional cases.
I think it was Kagan who never sat as a judge.I believe she is confusing the woman Bush nominated back when he was President…
Where do you get your damn information from?
Amy sure the hell was a judge before she was selected for her position on the USSC and your ignorant comment does not amaze me but you should make sure you have your information correct because you are dead wrong about what you wrote when it concerns USSC Jude Amy!
Amy Coney Barrett - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------She just proved herself UNWILLING to defend the Constitution of the United States. She's not up to the job..........This one CLEARLY isn't qualified.
"You have no idea what's coming."
{...
Trump nominated Barrett to the Seventh Circuit, and the Senate confirmed her on October 31, 2017. Before and while serving on the federal bench, she has been a professor of law at Notre Dame Law School, where she has taught civil procedure, constitutional law, and statutory interpretation.[2][3][4][5][6] She was also a women's leader for the Christian lay movement People of Praise.[7]
On September 26, 2020, Trump nominated Barrett to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States.[8][9][10]
...}
The Seventh Circuit is an appeals court, so than Barrett was NEVER a real judge in a real court.
Appeals courts are very different.
Total and complete horseshit.
I know what a woman is.
So does my wife.
So does our daughter.
I'm sorry that you don't.
ABA is a Leftard organization. Did she give 3 months to a pedophile when she could have given 10 years?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, now we have the judgment from:
1. An anonymous chatterati using a fake name on an internet gossipboard. Thank you, poster 'scruffy'.
We also have the judgment of the American Bar Association, as reported by Fox News:
2. "Members of the American Bar Association (ABA) panel that investigated Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's legal record rejected GOP claims that President Biden's Supreme Court nominee has been soft on child pornography offenders.
Members of ABA's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary testified before the Senate Thursday that their confidential interviews with lawyers who have interacted with Jackson, as well as their review of her cases, revealed that Jackson was an unbiased, brilliant jurist with an "impeccable" record."
3. You be the judge.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, we give up.
What's coming?
Batter up, mein freund.
Tell or go.
Holy shit, so now appeals court and sitting on one is no longer a judge according to the left!{...
Trump nominated Barrett to the Seventh Circuit, and the Senate confirmed her on October 31, 2017. Before and while serving on the federal bench, she has been a professor of law at Notre Dame Law School, where she has taught civil procedure, constitutional law, and statutory interpretation.[2][3][4][5][6] She was also a women's leader for the Christian lay movement People of Praise.[7]
On September 26, 2020, Trump nominated Barrett to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States.[8][9][10]
...}
The Seventh Circuit is an appeals court, so than Barrett was NEVER a real judge in a real court.
Appeals courts are very different.
Sure there are lots of easy cases, but what about the hard ones?
Like I said, what about hermaphrodites, XYY or XXY chromosomes, people who look one way but whose appearance conflicts with their chromosomes, etc.
You do NOT know.
Neither does your wife or daughter.
Topic isn’t about birth defects. Topic is women being treated as second class citizens and forced to undress in front of men.Sure there are lots of easy cases, but what about the hard ones?
Like I said, what about hermaphrodites, XYY or XXY chromosomes, people who look one way but whose appearance conflicts with their chromosomes, etc.
You do NOT know.
Neither does your wife or daughter.
This hasn't been an issue for millennia, all of a sudden it's whatever a person says is a woman is a woman? and it can change depending on what the person in question is thinking at the moment?
How many of the current Trans types are those rare genetic anomalies?
Yes he does know. As I know. As every conservative here knows what a woman is. My kids know what a woman is too. They can tell mommy from daddy at a pretty early age.Sure there are lots of easy cases, but what about the hard ones?
Like I said, what about hermaphrodites, XYY or XXY chromosomes, people who look one way but whose appearance conflicts with their chromosomes, etc.
You do NOT know.
Neither does your wife or daughter.
Does not matter.
The point is that there are these rare anomalies, so then a good judge would have deferred, just as she did.
It is not an open and shut, 100%, like people are falsely claiming.
And she was not ask to define what a woman is.This insanity is the ultimate outcome of holding back well qualified candidates while you promote unqualified white people. Amy Coney Barrett was unqualified and hadn't even been a judge.
The Supreme Court is the final APPEALS COURT of the system, it isn't a real court either by your definition. Circuit court experience is far more comparable to SC experience than district courts or trial courts.
Circuit courts are courts, stop being a literalist.
You don’t change science because out of over a billion people there might be 1000 oddities. Oddities are mistakes of nature.It is extremely stupid to ask "what is a woman" to a judge.
A judge is supposed to weigh between arguments, not come up with their own.
And a judge is supposed to reference the legislative backdrop, not come up with their own.
But as a person who does have some biological knowledge, I can tell you no one knows what a woman is.
While we frequently use a vagina vs a penis as a reference, what about a hermaphrodite who has both?
We frequently consider the XX chromosomes as opposed to XY, but what about XXY or XYY?
There are also hundreds, if not thousands of other exceptional cases.
Because she knows what a woman is. Ketanji has been indoctrinated to judge with her feelings instead of facts her entire life.And she was not ask to define what a woman is.
Dude, stop digging a hole for yourself.
This hasn't been an issue for millennia now all of a sudden it's the hardest question EVAH.
TITLE IX should be abolished if you put a "so called" woman like Kangaroo Brown on SCOTUS. If she needs a Biologist to define what a women is, that means she is covertly saying that she is down with advancing The Transgender-Homosexual agenda. That will abolish all standards of decency and virtue in this country if it continues to progress and we will devolve in to Sodom and Gomorrah.Neither is asking what does 2+2 equal. While people may disagree, science dictates only one answer for each.
Major topics in society today are women being forced to compete against men in sports, forced to be in front of men in showers and bathrooms, women locked in jails with men, etc etc. Also is the major issue of parents being engaged in their child’s education. 8 year olds being exposed to homoerotic teachings in public schools is at the front burner of society.
She knew the question was coming.
Women are being treated like second class citizens. And if you don’t even know what a woman is how can you contribute to the solution?
Americans need a Supreme Court justice who will protect women and our children and will defend parents' constitutional right to decide what is best for their own kids.
