Asking Jackson What a Woman Is Was Not a Gotcha Question As the Left Proclaim

How many XX people have grown a penis?

Not an enlarged clitoris, an actual functioning penis.

It is rare.
But some men have such a defective Y chromosomes that are falling apart.
When that happens, the penis portion can become transferred to the X chromosome.
Then if they have a daughter, that daughter can get an X chromosome with a penis portion.
 
Execution is murder because it is totally unnecessary.
Executions are done because they are enjoyed by those who do it, and they serve no purpose.


A death penalty is a good deterrent as it prevent re-offense at least by the person who receives it.

Some people are just that dangerous.

Libs sometimes suggest life imprisonment instead. Doesn't work.

No breachproof prison has ever been built, and none ever will. Further, even if the person doesn't escape, they can still be a danger to those inside- both employees and other prisoners. How would you feel if your son was serving time for ripping mattress tags and sharing a cell with Jeff Dahmer or another fiend?
 
It is rare.
But some men have such a defective Y chromosomes that are falling apart.
When that happens, the penis portion can become transferred to the X chromosome.
Then if they have a daughter, that daughter can get an X chromosome with a penis portion.

You got a link for that?
 
Not that I can see.
Here is her only legal qualifications as a judge:
{...
Barrett spent two years as a judicial law clerk after law school, first for judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1997 to 1998, and then for justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1998 to 1999.
...}

She was appointed to the appeals court by Trump in 2017, but appeals court is not experience as a judge.
{...
On May 8, 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Barrett to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit after Judge John Daniel Tinder took senior status.[5][6] A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on her nomination was held on September 6, 2017.[45]
...}
Well by your definition of judge neither are the SCOTUS justices since they are just an appeals court. So why would you need judicial experience to do the job of not a judge?
 
Um, Barrett was on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Appeals court judges are most certainly judges. Might want to stay in your lane Rigby.

The question is not whether or not appeals court judges are technically judges or not.
The point is she NEVER presided over a normal court case in a court of law.
She never had to deal with witnesses, evidence, etc.
Appeals are extremely limited in compared to a normal courtroom.
 
Execution is not murder, murder is a specific crime, and a legal execution by the State is not a crime.

It is a homicide, but a legal constitutional homicide.

Wrong.
Criminal legislators CLAIM that they have some magical legal authority to execute that they actually do NOT have.
So they just pretend it is not murder, when clearly the truth is that it most certainly is murder.
Murder by legislator is still murder.
Legislators do NOT have any legal authority write legislation to allow executions.
When they do, they are guilty of murder.
 
Wrong.
We are not talking about changing society at all, but what the correct answer is when a judge is asked "what is a woman"?
The correct answer is that there is no one correct answer, so her response was correct.
A judge has to answer for 100% of the population, not just 99.982%.

More proof, as if we needed anymore, leftism is a mental disorder.
 
You got a link for that?

Not sure this is a good one. Have to go. No time right now.
 
Wrong.
Criminal legislators CLAIM that they have some magical legal authority to execute that they actually do NOT have.
So they just pretend it is not murder, when clearly the truth is that it most certainly is murder.
Murder by legislator is still murder.
Legislators do NOT have any legal authority write legislation to allow executions.
When they do, they are guilty of murder.

The US constitution references ones life as something protected by due process, thus taking a life must be constitutional.

Why can't you just say "I don't like the death penalty"? Why do you have to make up obvious falsehoods such as legal executions are murder?
 
Not sure this is a good one. Have to go. No time right now.

How often does this happen? once in a million, a billion?

Outlier cases doesn't mean that for a VAST MAJORITY of times, women are humans with an XX chromosome set, who possess a vagina and a uterus, or at least were born with them.

That's a woman.
 
The question is not whether or not appeals court judges are technically judges or not.
The point is she NEVER presided over a normal court case in a court of law.
She never had to deal with witnesses, evidence, etc.
Appeals are extremely limited in compared to a normal courtroom.
What do you think the SC does, idiot?
 
It is rare.
But some men have such a defective Y chromosomes that are falling apart.
When that happens, the penis portion can become transferred to the X chromosome.
Then if they have a daughter, that daughter can get an X chromosome with a penis portion.
Let’s change the entire country from reality because a leftist saw something.
 
The US constitution references ones life as something protected by due process, thus taking a life must be constitutional.

Why can't you just say "I don't like the death penalty"? Why do you have to make up obvious falsehoods such as legal executions are murder?

Wrong.
The Constitution is NOT a source of any legal authority.
It is supposed to be a recognition of inherent rights as being the ONLY source of legal authority in a constitutional republic, and to delineate jurisdiction between federal and all else.

There is no means by which executions could be legal.
We as individuals can't do them, so then we can't delegate them to any gov we create.
 
How often does this happen? once in a million, a billion?

Outlier cases doesn't mean that for a VAST MAJORITY of times, women are humans with an XX chromosome set, who possess a vagina and a uterus, or at least were born with them.

That's a woman.

There are a gazillion different things that do often happen.
So science says at least 10% of so of society has some non-binary aspect.
The use of hormone based pesticides and herbicides is increasing the problem greatly.
 
I saw a snake at the zoo that grew a second head. It’s still a snake.

Male and female are not really different, but just different final results from hormones present during development.
There are lots of things that can disrupt what should have happened, and something else then is the result.
So this is not like a snake with 2 heads, in that this is far more common than that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top