Rigby5
Diamond Member
Let’s change the entire country from reality because a leftist saw something.
Again, we are not talking about changing anything.
We are just talking about the nominee being correct to not comment about what a woman is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let’s change the entire country from reality because a leftist saw something.
You are trying to use extremely rare abnormalities to confuse the issue. What percentage of the population has any of these problems? Less than half of one percent if I had to guess.It is rare.
But some men have such a defective Y chromosomes that are falling apart.
When that happens, the penis portion can become transferred to the X chromosome.
Then if they have a daughter, that daughter can get an X chromosome with a penis portion.
An execution is not murder it is justice.The reason execution is murder is that it is deliberate killing of someone else, when NOT necessary in order to defend the rights of anyone else.
Killing in immediate defense is not murder because you have no choice.
Execution is murder because it is totally unnecessary.
Executions are done because they are enjoyed by those who do it, and they serve no purpose.
Nor can anyone ever gain the legal authority to execute.
We as individuals only have self defense authority, but not execution authority, so there is no legal way to delegate execution authority to government.
She was incorrect and evasive. That rules her out as a SCOTUS judge. It was a simple question and she dishonestly evaded answering it.Again, we are not talking about changing anything.
We are just talking about the nominee being correct to not comment about what a woman is.
So you're saying there is no legal definition of what a woman is then? Cool we can count on this nominee to strike down any law that mentions the word woman in it. I assume she doesnt agree with Roe V Wade or the premise that a "woman" has the right to an abortion. How can she if she cant articulate what a woman is? How can she ascribe a right to a category of people she cant define?Again, we are not talking about changing anything.
We are just talking about the nominee being correct to not comment about what a woman is.
So basically the same thing she did as a US Circuit judge.The SCOTUS does NOT allow new evidence, testimony, etc.
The SCOTUS only allows legal appeals about previous evidence, testimony, rulings, etc.
You are trying to use extremely rare abnormalities to confuse the issue. What percentage of the population has any of these problems? Less than half of one percent if I had to guess.
Some snakes are born with 2 heads, but no one thinks of a two headed snake when you say "Cobra".
So.A 2 headed snake is likely going to die and is not functional.
A person with a dysfunctional Y chromosome or someone whose development has been influenced by pesticides, can live a perfectly normal life.
What people forget is that the Y chromosome is very small and dysfunctional, and getting more so all the time.
So at some point in the future, the Y chromosome is likely to become totally nonviable.
Hogwash.Yes it has ALWAYS been a question.
The fact sexes exist is purely accidental.
And we now know there are more than 2 sexes.
Wrong.
The Constitution is NOT a source of any legal authority.
It is supposed to be a recognition of inherent rights as being the ONLY source of legal authority in a constitutional republic, and to delineate jurisdiction between federal and all else.
There is no means by which executions could be legal.
We as individuals can't do them, so then we can't delegate them to any gov we create.
There are a gazillion different things that do often happen.
So science says at least 10% of so of society has some non-binary aspect.
The use of hormone based pesticides and herbicides is increasing the problem greatly.
Google "trisomy"."Science"
A woman is a human with XX chromosomes and is born with a vagina and a uterus.
Less than 1% occurrences of genetic issues does not change this.
rigby has no idea what hes actually arguing. He's making shit up as he goes along.Google "trisomy".
Look at the pictures.
THAT is what Rigby5 is trying to argue.
You have NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT! !!!A 2 headed snake is likely going to die and is not functional.
A person with a dysfunctional Y chromosome or someone whose development has been influenced by pesticides, can live a perfectly normal life.
What people forget is that the Y chromosome is very small and dysfunctional, and getting more so all the time.
So at some point in the future, the Y chromosome is likely to become totally nonviable.
Male and female are not really different, but just different final results from hormones present during development.
There are lots of things that can disrupt what should have happened, and something else then is the result.
So this is not like a snake with 2 heads, in that this is far more common than that.
A 2 headed snake is likely going to die and is not functional.
A person with a dysfunctional Y chromosome or someone whose development has been influenced by pesticides, can live a perfectly normal life.
What people forget is that the Y chromosome is very small and dysfunctional, and getting more so all the time.
So at some point in the future, the Y chromosome is likely to become totally nonviable.
That's why I keep saying, today's lefties have left orbit. They're lost in space. They're abusing science, abusing the law, and abusing other people PERSONALLY with whom they disagree.It always amazes me the lengths to which leftists will go to convince themselves their thoughts are rational.
So basically the same thing she did as a US Circuit judge.
So WTF are you complaining about her experience then?