Paulie
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2007
- 40,769
- 6,382
- 1,830
There was no secret that this guy was marked as a war target.I'd prefer such a memo not be "secret".Thanks, but I've decided that it is pointless to argue with these morons. The difference has been explained to them repeatedly and they just stick their fingers in their ears.
![]()
If this citizen's constitutional rights are/were potentially at stake here, I'd like to know the details and the explanations from the administration and anyone who was part of the information dissemination. I believe it's our business as well, as fellow citizens.
I'm not apt to just accept the WORD of any administration or its lawyers, no matter what the political affiliation of any of them. I'm getting a bit tired of all of these extreme measures that are being undertaken by our government where the only justification we're given is "memos" at best, and "sorry, it's a secret" at worst.
Where is the transparency?
That's not what I'm talking about though. There was a "secret memo" regarding the details behind the whole situation.
Nothing needs to be kept a secret about the details of the government's justification, reasoning, etc, for setting out to willfully kill a US citizen.
It's become way too easy for the government to simply justify secrets in the name of "national security".