Assault rifles for self defense

[LeftCoastVoter]

Are you saying tax laws do not treat people differently according to their income?

tax laws are arbitrary as you can change tax brackets. can you change your ethnicity?

does your tax bracket determine your right to vote, right to own property, right to privacy, right against self incrimination or right choose? do lower tax brackets change your rights? do higher tax brackets afford you more rights?

The only thing you care about is skin color. Guess what, laws treat you differently based on that as well, ever here of affirmative action and disparate impact laws?

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

tax laws are arbitrary as you can change tax brackets. can you change your ethnicity?

does your tax bracket determine your right to vote, right to own property, right to privacy, right against self incrimination or right choose? do lower tax brackets change your rights? do higher tax brackets afford you more rights?

The only thing you care about is skin color. Guess what, laws treat you differently based on that as well, ever here of affirmative action and disparate impact laws?

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

It doesn't? Why was it written into laws about civil liberties then?

 

[thereisnospoon]

tax laws are arbitrary as you can change tax brackets. can you change your ethnicity?

does your tax bracket determine your right to vote, right to own property, right to privacy, right against self incrimination or right choose? do lower tax brackets change your rights? do higher tax brackets afford you more rights?

The only thing you care about is skin color. Guess what, laws treat you differently based on that as well, ever here of affirmative action and disparate impact laws?

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

That is without a doubt a plethora of nonsequiturs.

 

[thereisnospoon]

The only thing you care about is skin color. Guess what, laws treat you differently based on that as well, ever here of affirmative action and disparate impact laws?

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

It doesn't? Why was it written into laws about civil liberties then?

Watch this!!!

 

[LeftCoastVoter]

The only thing you care about is skin color. Guess what, laws treat you differently based on that as well, ever here of affirmative action and disparate impact laws?

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

It doesn't? Why was it written into laws about civil liberties then?

the right to a job is not a constitutionally protect right.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

It doesn't? Why was it written into laws about civil liberties then?

the right to a job is not a constitutionally protect right.

The laws that say that you can't be fired, or not hired, or that employers need to hire a certain percentage of people, or that banks have to lend to certain percentages, all based on skin color are unconstitutional? Does that include all those disparate impact laws that they use to make sure that laws send as many whites to jail as other colors?

 

[bripat9643]

The only thing you care about is skin color. Guess what, laws treat you differently based on that as well, ever here of affirmative action and disparate impact laws?

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

The constitution says all laws must be applied equally to everyone. It doesn't mention any exemptions. Whether a law has something to do with "civil liberties" is a non sequitur. Furthermore, if any law isn't applied to people uniformly regardless of your skin color, it's a violation of your Constitutional rights.

 

[bripat9643]

affirmative action doesnt apply to civil liberties genius. you dont get different rights based on your skin color. do white people get the right to vote and blacks dont? do black people have the right own guns and white people dont?

you have a giant inability to different between constitutional rights and privileges. the constitution doesnt guarantee you a job.

It doesn't? Why was it written into laws about civil liberties then?

the right to a job is not a constitutionally protect right.

ROFL! Then what is the basis for all those court cases where blacks complained they were discriminated against in hiring or promotion?

You liberals assholes can't seem to keep your story straight.

 

[LeftCoastVoter]

It doesn't? Why was it written into laws about civil liberties then?

the right to a job is not a constitutionally protect right.

ROFL! Then what is the basis for all those court cases where blacks complained they were discriminated against in hiring or promotion?

You liberals assholes can't seem to keep your story straight.

In the United States, affirmative action refers to equal opportunity employment measures that Federal contractors and subcontractors are legally required to adopt. AA didnt apply to the private sector, and it is not defined in the constitution as a right.

wanna try again?

 

[martybegan]

the right to a job is not a constitutionally protect right.

ROFL! Then what is the basis for all those court cases where blacks complained they were discriminated against in hiring or promotion?

You liberals assholes can't seem to keep your story straight.

In the United States, affirmative action refers to equal opportunity employment measures that Federal contractors and subcontractors are legally required to adopt. AA didnt apply to the private sector, and it is not defined in the constitution as a right.

wanna try again?

So its OK for the government to discriminate, as long as its against white people? And the justification is for previous wrongs, even though most people affected did not have any part in said wrongs?

And since it applies to federal and state/local subcontractors, it does apply to the private sector.

 

[LeftCoastVoter]

ROFL! Then what is the basis for all those court cases where blacks complained they were discriminated against in hiring or promotion?

You liberals assholes can't seem to keep your story straight.

In the United States, affirmative action refers to equal opportunity employment measures that Federal contractors and subcontractors are legally required to adopt. AA didnt apply to the private sector, and it is not defined in the constitution as a right.

wanna try again?

So its OK for the government to discriminate, as long as its against white people? And the justification is for previous wrongs, even though most people affected did not have any part in said wrongs?

And since it applies to federal and state/local subcontractors, it does apply to the private sector.

AA was developed eliminate the preferential treatment given to white applicants, not the other way around.

and it doesnt apply universally the private sector mr genuis. a privately owned company which does not received government funds through contracts is not required to abide by AA.

 

[bripat9643]

the right to a job is not a constitutionally protect right.

ROFL! Then what is the basis for all those court cases where blacks complained they were discriminated against in hiring or promotion?

You liberals assholes can't seem to keep your story straight.

In the United States, affirmative action refers to equal opportunity employment measures that Federal contractors and subcontractors are legally required to adopt. AA didnt apply to the private sector, and it is not defined in the constitution as a right.

wanna try again?

Equal application of all the laws is a right. That includes AA laws.

You FAIL.

 

[LeftCoastVoter]

ROFL! Then what is the basis for all those court cases where blacks complained they were discriminated against in hiring or promotion?

You liberals assholes can't seem to keep your story straight.

In the United States, affirmative action refers to equal opportunity employment measures that Federal contractors and subcontractors are legally required to adopt. AA didnt apply to the private sector, and it is not defined in the constitution as a right.

wanna try again?

Equal application of all the laws is a right. That includes AA laws.

You FAIL.

can you point to the section of the Constitution that defines that?

youre going full retard again. better watch it.

 

[martybegan]

In the United States, affirmative action refers to equal opportunity employment measures that Federal contractors and subcontractors are legally required to adopt. AA didnt apply to the private sector, and it is not defined in the constitution as a right.

wanna try again?

So its OK for the government to discriminate, as long as its against white people? And the justification is for previous wrongs, even though most people affected did not have any part in said wrongs?

And since it applies to federal and state/local subcontractors, it does apply to the private sector.

AA was developed eliminate the preferential treatment given to white applicants, not the other way around.

and it doesnt apply universally the private sector mr genuis. a privately owned company which does not received government funds through contracts is not required to abide by AA.

And in the end that preferrential treatment negatively impacts someone else. Some business that is not an MBE/WBE loses out because they cannot apply for a given contract.

The way these work is that even if you are not an MBE/WBE subcontractor a portion of your work has to be done by MBE/WBE firms. So you have to shut out non MBE/WBE vendors even if they are superior in terms of quality or price.

Keep living in that ivory tower where you think AA helps everyone and harms no one.

 

[LeftCoastVoter]

So its OK for the government to discriminate, as long as its against white people? And the justification is for previous wrongs, even though most people affected did not have any part in said wrongs?

And since it applies to federal and state/local subcontractors, it does apply to the private sector.

AA was developed eliminate the preferential treatment given to white applicants, not the other way around.

and it doesnt apply universally the private sector mr genuis. a privately owned company which does not received government funds through contracts is not required to abide by AA.

And in the end that preferrential treatment negatively impacts someone else. Some business that is not an MBE/WBE loses out because they cannot apply for a given contract.

The way these work is that even if you are not an MBE/WBE subcontractor a portion of your work has to be done by MBE/WBE firms. So you have to shut out non MBE/WBE vendors even if they are superior in terms of quality or price.

Keep living in that ivory tower where you think AA helps everyone and harms no one.

yet a government contract is not a right as defined by the constitution. do you still not understand this? there is no right guaranteeing employment.

 

[asaratis]

The firepower of the average law-abiding citizen bearing his own arms should be equal to the basic firepower of the US infantryman. Semi-automatic assault rifle...semi-automatic pistol.

There is no need to allow explosives, bazookas, howitzers, mortars, rockets, grenades etc.

 

[LeftCoastVoter]

The firepower of the average law-abiding citizen bearing his own arms should be equal to the basic firepower of the US infantryman. Semi-automatic assault rifle...semi-automatic pistol.

There is no need to allow explosives, bazookas, howitzers, mortars, rockets, grenades etc.

so you have officially advocated for public ownership of automatic weapons as the basic M-4 and M-16 as issued by the military are fully automatic.

great argument.

 

[bripat9643]

In the United States, affirmative action refers to equal opportunity employment measures that Federal contractors and subcontractors are legally required to adopt. AA didnt apply to the private sector, and it is not defined in the constitution as a right.

wanna try again?

Equal application of all the laws is a right. That includes AA laws.

You FAIL.

can you point to the section of the Constitution that defines that?

youre going full retard again. better watch it.

It's called "the 14th Amendment," moron.

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Now who's going "full retard?"

 

[LeftCoastVoter]

Equal application of all the laws is a right. That includes AA laws.

You FAIL.

can you point to the section of the Constitution that defines that?

youre going full retard again. better watch it.

It's called "the 14th Amendment," moron.

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Now who's going "full retard?"

life, liberty and property is not defined as taxes or employment. equal protection of the laws means equal administration.

wanna try again full retard?

 

[martybegan]

The firepower of the average law-abiding citizen bearing his own arms should be equal to the basic firepower of the US infantryman. Semi-automatic assault rifle...semi-automatic pistol.

There is no need to allow explosives, bazookas, howitzers, mortars, rockets, grenades etc.

so you have officially advocated for public ownership of automatic weapons as the basic M-4 and M-16 as issued by the military are fully automatic.

great argument.

US infantrymen no longer are equipped with full auto assault weapons. Current ones are limited to a 3 round burst per trigger pull. Each section has 1 SAW gunner to provide automatic firepower.