Atheists Want Proof Of God?

[Frannie]

Water is not drilled...………………….try again

Simple slip there huh

It’s a Deepwater well. You wouldn’t understand.

I understand that water does not offer enough resistance to be drilled unless it is ice

Google Deepwater well. Learn something.

Google cancer, I cured it...…………………

Then Google the first man on Jupiter, I was there, after I engineered the Jupiter One

#stillwinning

Yup you are still winning

 

[ding]

It’s a Deepwater well. You wouldn’t understand.

I understand that water does not offer enough resistance to be drilled unless it is ice

Google Deepwater well. Learn something.

Google cancer, I cured it...…………………

Then Google the first man on Jupiter, I was there, after I engineered the Jupiter One

#stillwinning

Yup you are still winning

100%

--Universe Forum--Big Bang--What powered it?

 

[Frannie]

Google re-incarnation, there's plenty of stuff out there.

Creation is a theory that's really based on nothing at all, just myths, stories... nothing even remotely solid. Evolution is a fact that's happening right now. Ex: as time goes on, humans are evolving to be taller beings. How do i know that? Just look at houses and clothes from 200 years ago. They all appear to be midgets compared to us now.

The big bang is also based on nothing and to believe it one must discount the law of conservation of mass

We don’t know what the Big Bang was made of or where it came from because we can’t see that far back yet.

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

that is correct - BB is cyclical, energy to matter to energy indefinitely at the moments of singularity the instances of transfer from one to the other.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics precludes an infinite acting universe.

Cyclical universes are not possible for this reason.

Again simpleton the universe is NOT just expanding, but the rate of expansion is speeding not slowing, this is why understood physical principles used in the cosmological constant math fail as there is 85 percent too little mass to enable the expansion.

But you keep babbling

 

[Frannie]

I understand that water does not offer enough resistance to be drilled unless it is ice

Google Deepwater well. Learn something.

Google cancer, I cured it...…………………

Then Google the first man on Jupiter, I was there, after I engineered the Jupiter One

#stillwinning

Yup you are still winning

100%

--Universe Forum--Big Bang--What powered it?

The retard actually has as much idea as the dorks who wrote your link.
Again girl internet links are not academically accepted except if you are retardsd

 

[ding]

The big bang is also based on nothing and to believe it one must discount the law of conservation of mass

We don’t know what the Big Bang was made of or where it came from because we can’t see that far back yet.

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

that is correct - BB is cyclical, energy to matter to energy indefinitely at the moments of singularity the instances of transfer from one to the other.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics precludes an infinite acting universe.

Cyclical universes are not possible for this reason.

Again simpleton the universe is NOT just expanding, but the rate of expansion is speeding not slowing, this is why understood physical principles used in the cosmological constant math fail as there is 85 percent too little mass to enable the expansion.

But you keep babbling

The rate at which the universe is expanding has exactly jack shit to do with the origin of the universe. It only has to do with the fate of the universe.

14 billion years ago the universe was created from nothing and then began to expand and cool.

 

[ding]

Google Deepwater well. Learn something.

Google cancer, I cured it...…………………

Then Google the first man on Jupiter, I was there, after I engineered the Jupiter One

#stillwinning

Yup you are still winning

100%

--Universe Forum--Big Bang--What powered it?

The retard actually has as much idea as the dorks who wrote your link.
Again girl internet links are not academically accepted except if you are retardsd

You mean the link from Harvard?

Too funny.

 

[ding]

Google re-incarnation, there's plenty of stuff out there.

Creation is a theory that's really based on nothing at all, just myths, stories... nothing even remotely solid. Evolution is a fact that's happening right now. Ex: as time goes on, humans are evolving to be taller beings. How do i know that? Just look at houses and clothes from 200 years ago. They all appear to be midgets compared to us now.

The big bang is also based on nothing and to believe it one must discount the law of conservation of mass

We don’t know what the Big Bang was made of or where it came from because we can’t see that far back yet.

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

that is correct - BB is cyclical, energy to matter to energy indefinitely at the moments of singularity the instances of transfer from one to the other.

Dude there is no cycle when something comes from nothing

I like how you simultaneously argue for and against inflation in the same thread.

I can’t tell if you know what you are doing or don’t know what you are doing.

 

[Frannie]

^doesn't understand what he is talking about and never will.

Haven't spoken here yet actually

Educate yourself.

How does he know where the universe came from?

Is he god?

I can find proof of bigfoot on the internet, does it mean something

 

[Frannie]

Google cancer, I cured it...…………………

Then Google the first man on Jupiter, I was there, after I engineered the Jupiter One

#stillwinning

Yup you are still winning

100%

--Universe Forum--Big Bang--What powered it?

The retard actually has as much idea as the dorks who wrote your link.
Again girl internet links are not academically accepted except if you are retardsd

You mean the link from Harvard?

Too funny.

If you put all the best professors on one side of the room and a gerbil on the other side of the room their knowledge of what the universe is would be exactly equal

 

[Frannie]

The big bang is also based on nothing and to believe it one must discount the law of conservation of mass

We don’t know what the Big Bang was made of or where it came from because we can’t see that far back yet.

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

that is correct - BB is cyclical, energy to matter to energy indefinitely at the moments of singularity the instances of transfer from one to the other.

Dude there is no cycle when something comes from nothing

I like how you simultaneously argue for and against inflation in the same thread.

I can’t tell if you know what you are doing or don’t know what you are doing.

Arguments for and against run concurrently by the same mind indicate multiple personality disorder.

Obamacare covers this so get help

 

[ding]

^doesn't understand what he is talking about and never will.

Haven't spoken here yet actually

Educate yourself.

How does he know where the universe came from?

Is he god?

I can find proof of bigfoot on the internet, does it mean something

Because the implication of the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that the universe had to have a beginning.

 

[ding]

We don’t know what the Big Bang was made of or where it came from because we can’t see that far back yet.

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

that is correct - BB is cyclical, energy to matter to energy indefinitely at the moments of singularity the instances of transfer from one to the other.

Dude there is no cycle when something comes from nothing

I like how you simultaneously argue for and against inflation in the same thread.

I can’t tell if you know what you are doing or don’t know what you are doing.

Arguments for and against run concurrently by the same mind indicate multiple personality disorder.

Obamacare covers this so get help

You just described yourself. You are the one arguing both sides.

 

[Frannie]

^doesn't understand what he is talking about and never will.

Haven't spoken here yet actually

Educate yourself.

How does he know where the universe came from?

Is he god?

I can find proof of bigfoot on the internet, does it mean something

Because the implication of the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that the universe had to have a beginning.

There is no physical law that allows for the creation of any type of matter

 

[ding]

#stillwinning

Yup you are still winning

100%

--Universe Forum--Big Bang--What powered it?

The retard actually has as much idea as the dorks who wrote your link.
Again girl internet links are not academically accepted except if you are retardsd

You mean the link from Harvard?

Too funny.

If you put all the best professors on one side of the room and a gerbil on the other side of the room their knowledge of what the universe is would be exactly equal

They would all agree that inflation theory is the leading cosmological model because it explains what we see.

And none of them would deny that the universe didn’t begin 14 billion years ago like you are doing.

 

[Frannie]

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

That is true my point is that the theory says that all matter in the universe was created in the big bang. This violates conservation of mass and requires all new physics

that is correct - BB is cyclical, energy to matter to energy indefinitely at the moments of singularity the instances of transfer from one to the other.

Dude there is no cycle when something comes from nothing

I like how you simultaneously argue for and against inflation in the same thread.

I can’t tell if you know what you are doing or don’t know what you are doing.

Arguments for and against run concurrently by the same mind indicate multiple personality disorder.

Obamacare covers this so get help

You just described yourself. You are the one arguing both sides.

Yes Sybil, your mother was wrong, but that said I might have locked you in the closet as well

 

[ding]

^doesn't understand what he is talking about and never will.

Haven't spoken here yet actually

Educate yourself.

How does he know where the universe came from?

Is he god?

I can find proof of bigfoot on the internet, does it mean something

Because the implication of the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that the universe had to have a beginning.

There is no physical law that allows for the creation of any type of matter

Inflation theory does. I provided a 3 minute video which explained it. You never watched it.

 

[Frannie]

Yup you are still winning

100%

--Universe Forum--Big Bang--What powered it?

The retard actually has as much idea as the dorks who wrote your link.
Again girl internet links are not academically accepted except if you are retardsd

You mean the link from Harvard?

Too funny.

If you put all the best professors on one side of the room and a gerbil on the other side of the room their knowledge of what the universe is would be exactly equal

They would all agree that inflation theory is the leading cosmological model because it explains what we see.

And none of them would deny that the universe didn’t begin 14 billion years ago like you are doing.

I have never denied the age of the universe. You are very confused

 

[ding]

that is correct - BB is cyclical, energy to matter to energy indefinitely at the moments of singularity the instances of transfer from one to the other.

Dude there is no cycle when something comes from nothing

I like how you simultaneously argue for and against inflation in the same thread.

I can’t tell if you know what you are doing or don’t know what you are doing.

Arguments for and against run concurrently by the same mind indicate multiple personality disorder.

Obamacare covers this so get help

You just described yourself. You are the one arguing both sides.

Yes Sybil, your mother was wrong, but that said I might have locked you in the closet as well

You are the one alternating between arguing for and against inflation theory.

 

[Frannie]

Haven't spoken here yet actually

Educate yourself.

How does he know where the universe came from?

Is he god?

I can find proof of bigfoot on the internet, does it mean something

Because the implication of the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that the universe had to have a beginning.

There is no physical law that allows for the creation of any type of matter

Inflation theory does. I provided a 3 minute video which explained it. You never watched it.

Theory is not fact, you are confused. You use the word theory then say it began that way as fact

Schizzos do this

 

[ding]

100%

--Universe Forum--Big Bang--What powered it?

The retard actually has as much idea as the dorks who wrote your link.
Again girl internet links are not academically accepted except if you are retardsd

You mean the link from Harvard?

Too funny.

If you put all the best professors on one side of the room and a gerbil on the other side of the room their knowledge of what the universe is would be exactly equal

They would all agree that inflation theory is the leading cosmological model because it explains what we see.

And none of them would deny that the universe didn’t begin 14 billion years ago like you are doing.

I have never denied the age of the universe. You are very confused

You just admitted the universe had a beginning if you admit it has an age.