"atlas shrugged" will change the face of american politics

How many do we need to have had to prove that the Constitution can be amended?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

How many times has it been amended in the past 80 years?

Your question is rhetorical, and irrelevant to the discussion.

If you wish to dispute that the Constitution can be amended by a super majority, thus proving that ultimately, the majority rules in this country, then do so.

Good luck.

My question is dead on your statement not so much
How many do we need to have had to prove that the Constitution can be amended?

A Constitutional amendment is just like a wind you know it there but you can't see it.
 
How many do we need to have had to prove that the Constitution can be amended?

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

How many times has it been amended in the past 80 years?

Your question is rhetorical, and irrelevant to the discussion.

If you wish to dispute that the Constitution can be amended by a super majority, thus proving that ultimately, the majority rules in this country, then do so.

Good luck.

it's like a super delegate on steroids, a democrat party exclusive
 
Your question is rhetorical, and irrelevant to the discussion.

If you wish to dispute that the Constitution can be amended by a super majority, thus proving that ultimately, the majority rules in this country, then do so.

Good luck.

it has EVERYTHING to do with the discussion. It is RARE...and difficult by design.

Progressives would rather obfuscate it by Fiat...

Conservative Presidents are rare too. Does that mean that Constitutionally, they are difficult by design?

lol
Are you pretending to be crafty? Pardon me while I remain unamused, and unimpressed.
 
You are a liberal socialist.
How so?

He's using the same measuring stick that rightwingers used to declare John McCain a liberal.

They are not right wingers.

They are extremently far right morally depraved individuals who pretend to be Republican and responsible libertarians or conservatives. According to them, Joe Scarborough is a liberal, Mitt Romney is a liberal, and, shoot, Ronnie Reagan is a liberal (never would have defended a defense of marriage law and was cozy with the soviets in removing the barriers between east and west.
 
Jokey Fakey? You remain the largest JOKE on these boards.
this is true... where has dante been ?

ratified by three quarters of the states, including the ones that think they can secede from the union.

Yep, which djepend on democratic votes. You are a joke right along with T and bigreb. You guys always, I mean always, walk into the wall.
 
How many times has it been amended in the past 80 years?

Your question is rhetorical, and irrelevant to the discussion.

If you wish to dispute that the Constitution can be amended by a super majority, thus proving that ultimately, the majority rules in this country, then do so.

Good luck.

it has EVERYTHING to do with the discussion. It is RARE...and difficult by design.

Progressives would rather obfuscate it by Fiat...

Such change rests on democratic, constitutional process.

Step off, young man.
 
Your question is rhetorical, and irrelevant to the discussion.

If you wish to dispute that the Constitution can be amended by a super majority, thus proving that ultimately, the majority rules in this country, then do so.

Good luck.

it has EVERYTHING to do with the discussion. It is RARE...and difficult by design.

Progressives would rather obfuscate it by Fiat...

Such change rests on democratic, constitutional process.

Step off, young man.

Son? First? DUH...and second?
*YOU* are in no position to tell anyone to do anything much less "step Off".
 

He's using the same measuring stick that rightwingers used to declare John McCain a liberal.

They are not right wingers.

They are extremently far right morally depraved individuals who pretend to be Republican and responsible libertarians or conservatives. According to them, Joe Scarborough is a liberal, Mitt Romney is a liberal, and, shoot, Ronnie Reagan is a liberal (never would have defended a defense of marriage law and was cozy with the soviets in removing the barriers between east and west.

holy shit bat man who the fuck called Ronald Reagan a liberal?
 
Is refusal to defend defense of marriage and working with the soviets conservative positions.

Nah.
 
Yes, T, you are a babbler. That is what far right wacks pretending to be responsible conservative or libertarians do, like you: they babble. Ronnie Reagan would have nothing to do with your kind.
 
Yes, T, you are a babbler. That is what far right wacks pretending to be responsible conservative or libertarians do, like you: they babble. Ronnie Reagan would have nothing to do with your kind.

*Content Wholly Ignored*

(Ain't worth my time except this post).
 
Yes, T, you are a babbler. That is what far right wacks pretending to be responsible conservative or libertarians do, like you: they babble. Ronnie Reagan would have nothing to do with your kind.

I am glad you do not think I and most others who call themself a conservative are like you. That means we are doing the right thing.:eusa_whistle:
 
Yes, T, you are a babbler. That is what far right wacks pretending to be responsible conservative or libertarians do, like you: they babble. Ronnie Reagan would have nothing to do with your kind.

I am glad you do not think I and most others who call themself a conservative are like you. That means we are doing the right thing.:eusa_whistle:

Jokey/Fakey is NO Conservative by any stretch.
 
You are not a conservative anymore than the T. You are not libertarians. You are far right wing loons who hide behind those terms. If you think McCain, Scarborough, Romney, Juan Williams, etc., are liberals, then you are clearly loony.

I am glad T gave up, because he had nothing. I am glad you gave up on the heavy military grade weapons argument finally, other than why you think you are entitled to a grenade launcher is rather loony.
 
Let's get back to the thread topic, Ayn Rand.

Let's get back to her atheism, and here contempt for faith, for starters.

Is that the changing of the face of politics we're going to see after this stupid movie comes out?
...a rejection of faith as a meaningful component of American politics??
What contempt...and Faith? Since WHEN did *YOU* become an accolyte for faith since I have seen you do nothing but laugh at it?

i don't know... this looks like pre judging to me... you've already decided it's...
also jake, you are too jaded to tell what a conservative could be (when you could be defining your side of the pile, perhaps another thread).

now, you are asserting her contempt of faith (presumptuously), why couldn't she be an athiest. shouldn't any given philosophy or religion be treated with equal respect ? do you think that religion plays any role in politics?
 
Last edited:
You are not a conservative anymore than the T. You are not libertarians. You are far right wing loons who hide behind those terms. If you think McCain, Scarborough, Romney, Juan Williams, etc., are liberals, then you are clearly loony.

I am glad T gave up, because he had nothing. I am glad you gave up on the heavy military grade weapons argument finally, other than why you think you are entitled to a grenade launcher is rather loony.

And if you think McCain, Scarborough, Romney, or Juan Williams are Conservative's that will make you a complete moron in my book.
 
You are not a conservative anymore than the T. You are not libertarians. You are far right wing loons who hide behind those terms. If you think McCain, Scarborough, Romney, Juan Williams, etc., are liberals, then you are clearly loony.

I am glad T gave up, because he had nothing. I am glad you gave up on the heavy military grade weapons argument finally, other than why you think you are entitled to a grenade launcher is rather loony.

*I* Gave up nothing. Do you enjoy being a horse's ASS Jokey? or do you do this because you have such a lonely existance that this is the ONLY WAY people will talk to you? ARE YOU this patheitic?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top