Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you for that thoughtful and articulate contribution to an important and sensitive topic. You are an invaluable member of this community. Now wipe the spit off your chin and shut the fuck up.I see the Pedo-Friendlies still fear losing their ability to accumulate personal kiddie harems. Sick freaks, all of them.
Let me tell you something!! I have post extensively using fact and logic on numerous threats that you have contaminated and trolled over a long period of time. Never once have you made an intelligent or reasonable comment. Not once have you ever posted or linked to a source to back up the stupidity that you present as fact. So don't give me any shit about calling you out on it.Thank you for that thoughtful and articulate contribution to an important and sensitive topic. You are an invaluable member of this community. Now wipe the spit off your chin and shut the fuck up.I see the Pedo-Friendlies still fear losing their ability to accumulate personal kiddie harems. Sick freaks, all of them.Agreed, this is a sensitive topic. What could be more sensitive that the debate of whether or not children should lose their main historical benefit of marriage: both a vital mother and father..if the word, institution and contract should be stripped of that benefit to children..(without their having unique & separate representation)Don't you ever get tired of bleating the same inane equine excrement??
Let's see...my responses are lucid, to the subject matter, substantive and not ad hominems. Your responses are vague, lacking simple logic, off topic and attacking the person instead of the subject.
I think we can see who is dishing out the horse shit here...an LGBT cult drone....will wonders never cease?...
Keep it up, Sil. You are doing a great service for western civilization and humanity. I share much of the info you provide to both friends and family.
Rdeans are the worst though. We hate them even more than teh gheys.It used to be people that literally believed God was talking to them were given psychiatric evaluation. Nowadays, they are elected to public office.While Trump himself has been pretty quiet on the subject of same sex marriage and LGBT rights in general, we know that he has surrounded himself with some of the most opprobrious bigots - both religious and those that are just far right-or alt right -ideologues and hate mongers.
There was the recent report - a resulted from a leak from the White House- that an executive order was being drafted to overturn Obamas EO prohibiting discrimination against Federal LGBT employees and contractors. If put in front of Trump, the lazy and incurious plutocrat might have mindlessly signed it. Fortunately, Jerod and Ivanka Kushner- two of the few rational and decent people on his inner circle interceded and it was quashed.
Nevertheless, the knowledge of the anti gay forces lurking in the White House, have , apparently ,emboldened ideological bigots and religious zealots across the country to take new aim at marriage equality.
There are at least three attempts in progress to do so. All have been launched since the election, and I can't help but to believe that they have been inspired and encouraged by the reactionary forces that have gained power and influence recently. No doubt that the prospect of tipping the balance of the Supreme Court is also a factor. Consider:
Tennessee Bill Would Undo Marriage Equality
A bill making its way through the Tennessee state legislature aims to roll back marriage equality in the Volunteer State. But LGBT advocates say the legislation is an unconstitutional attempt to overrule the U.S. Supreme Court.
Tennessee Republican Rep. Mark Pody, who claims God has called him to stop same-sex marriages, introduced House Bill 1412, the Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act, last September. At the same time, Sen. Mae Beavers, also a Republican, introduced companion legislation in the Senate.
This is really stupid and unconstitutional is light of the Obergefell ruling. What are these people thinking and do they not have anything better to do? Are there not some actual problems to address that they will spent time, money and energy on this??
As written, the bill seeks to declare it "the policy of Tennessee to defend natural marriage between one man and one woman regardless of any court decision to the contrary." It requires state officials, including the attorney general, to "defend any state or local government official from any lawsuit" arising from an official's refusal to marry a same-sex couple. The bill also seeks to prevent state and local agencies from implementing any punishment for those violating the Supreme Court's June 2015 ruling that mandated legal marriage equality nationwide.
They cannot possibly get away with this unless they can get Obergefell and Windsor overturned, and that is not happening. Similarly, the City of Houston is trying to undermine the right of same sex partners of city employees to recieve spousal benefits, also in violation of Obergefell:
Amid GOP Pressure, Texas High Court to Hear Challenge to Spousal Benefits
The Texas Supreme Court Friday agreed to hear a case challenging some of the rights gained with marriage equality.
The case involves whether the city of Houston is obligated to provide benefits to same-sex spouses of city employees, The Dallas Morning News reports. In September the high court had declined to hear the case, but justices reversed that decision amid pressure from top Republican state officials, including Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, and Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Then we have this out of Arkansas.
Seriously, Arkansas? Even Trump Knows Same-Sex Marriage Is Done Deal
Guys, you aren’t actually going to even believe this. There are still people trying to get rid of same-sex marriage. If you’re all, “didn’t we already fight about this a long time ago?” you’d be right. Except that news apparently hasn’t hit Arkansas just yet. One of its esteemed legislators just filed a Senate Joint Resolution requesting the United States Congress to start working on a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as the “union of one man and one woman.” How positively late-90s of him.
Yes, it is unlikely to go anywhere, and even congressional Republicans know that it is unpopular and a colossal waste of time. However, the point is, as I have said, that there has been a flurry of this type of activity since the election. Does anyone deny the obvious connection given that fact that no such attempts to roll back marriage equality in the 18 months or so since the Obergefell ruling were introduced until now.??
As much as Republicans hate blacks, Hispanics, Muslims and others, they hate gays most of all. Then those odious and hate filled miscreants claim they are the party of God.
What's funny is homos are so stupid they didn't know they could basically sign contracts similar to marriage contracts without the Obergefel ruling. Well either you're stupid or you just seek power. I believe it is a mix of both. Most homos don't know theyre being used, the few I know make it obvious.
What's funny is homos are so stupid they didn't know they could basically sign contracts similar to marriage contracts without the Obergefel ruling. Well either you're stupid or you just seek power. I believe it is a mix of both. Most homos don't know theyre being used, the few I know make it obvious.
It's that.
I've basically given up on this thread until now. Glad to see there are still a few willing to fight the homo agenda.
I've watched people who, 10 years ago, sware they'd never accept this perversion, accept it. It's sad watching my country die. I know where this is going, but we're expected to fight it. There has to be a witness. I'm glad there are still a few.
I really don't care what homos do, but MARRIAGE is a GOD ordained institution. The homosexuals have bullied our politicians to REDEFINE marriage to accommodate the perverted. This has to be resisted.
Well, the Scriptures affirm that "nature itself" should teach us this is a perversion of Creation:I'm an agnostic, it has nothing to with religion for me, it's obvious they're sicko deviants and sociopaths
Well, the Scriptures affirm that "nature itself" should teach us this is a perversion of Creation:I'm an agnostic, it has nothing to with religion for me, it's obvious they're sicko deviants and sociopaths
“God delivered them over in the cravings of their hearts to sexual impurity, so that their bodies were degraded among themselves. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie …. God delivered them over to degrading passions. For even their females exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. The males in the same way also left natural relations with females and were inflamed in their lust for one another” (Romans 1:24-27 HCSB).
You don't know whether the perverts are really accepted or whether people are agreeing to keep from being destroyed.What's funny is homos are so stupid they didn't know they could basically sign contracts similar to marriage contracts without the Obergefel ruling. Well either you're stupid or you just seek power. I believe it is a mix of both. Most homos don't know theyre being used, the few I know make it obvious.
It's that.
I've basically given up on this thread until now. Glad to see there are still a few willing to fight the homo agenda.
I've watched people who, 10 years ago, sware they'd never accept this perversion, accept it. It's sad watching my country die. I know where this is going, but we're expected to fight it. There has to be a witness. I'm glad there are still a few.
I really don't care what homos do, but MARRIAGE is a GOD ordained institution. The homosexuals have bullied our politicians to REDEFINE marriage to accommodate the perverted. This has to be resisted.
No actually it isn't. And the reason why it isn't is because of the main beneficiaries of the marriage contract: Children. Children did not have any unique representation at Obergefell for the main benefit they derived from the marriage contract: the guarantee of BOTH a mother and father. You cannot revise contracts in the US without all parties to said contract at the table with unique representation. Worse still, especially contracts cannot be revised to the demise of children that were involved in them. Can't be done. No contract involving children can contain terms onerous to them or terms that strip a vital provision away from them. Cant' be done.Since Obergefel, the issue of same sex marriage is settled. Now, it's the rights of of those who do not want to embrace perversion for themselves that need to be protected.
The 14th Amendment is explicit- the Equal protection applies to state laws.
Loving was okay to you because you agree with Loving- but not Obergefell- Constitutionally there is no difference.
And...in the 7th circuit court of appeals, Hively v Ivy Tech found in 2016 that homosexuals are not covered in any anticipation under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. They concluded that an Act of Congress would have to be made to afford homosexuals Constitutional protections. That's the latest word from the courts.
Obergefell was the latest word from the courts on marriage and that is what this is about Bubba
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The latest perhaps...but not the last. Children's main benefit of marriage will have its day in Court...Bubba..
No actually it isn't. And the reason why it isn't is because of the main beneficiaries of the marriage contract: Children. Children did not have any unique representation at Obergefell for the main benefit they derived from the marriage contract: the guarantee of BOTH a mother and father. You cannot revise contracts in the US without all parties to said contract at the table with unique representation. Worse still, especially contracts cannot be revised to the demise of children that were involved in them. Can't be done. No contract involving children can contain terms onerous to them or terms that strip a vital provision away from them. Cant' be done.Since Obergefel, the issue of same sex marriage is settled. Now, it's the rights of of those who do not want to embrace perversion for themselves that need to be protected.
On that point alone Obergefell could be overturned. But worse still, at least one, but probably two Justices were in violation of Capterton v A.T. Massey Coal (2009)'s findings that say no judge can advertise bias towards the outcome of a case in advance of hearing it. Ginsburg went on public media several weeks before the 2015 Hearing and told the world her verdict on Obergefell before she even sat on over it. That case can be overturned on that alone; or at a minimum...reheard with ALL parties to the proposed mandated contract revision having representation there..
Since Obergefel, the issue of same sex marriage is settled. Now, it's the rights of of those who do not want to embrace perversion for themselves that need to be protected.
Not all children of gay parents. They are all dysfunctional but not monsters. .keep your monster children away from othersThe constitution is already respected.
Georgian couples can get married in Georgia.
Where does the federal constitution say marriage laws are covered by the feds?
Marriage licences are issued by the states. If the couple want a religious or formal marriage, that is up to them.
A priest, a judge, a notary or a neighbor who has filed to officiate can marry a couple.
Does A, Does B, sign on the line, have a good life
Why does Tipsy think that the children of gay couples are 'monster children'?
She is a really sick bitch.
A strict constitutional supreme Court will hopefully straighten out gay overreaching and instruct them that they do not control the world.
